Tuesday, August 30, 2011

History Always Repeats Itself: Just like the late 1960s, Organized Blackness is going to War with White America

People write me and ask, "Why do you keep writing about college football? No one cares." Actually, they do. Later today you'll learn about the unrest that recently recruited Black athlete-students brought to Predominately White Institutions (PWI) in the late 1960s, culminating in the infamous Black 14 incident at the University of Wyoming. You'll also get a look at the University of Arkansas, much like yesterday's history of the LSU football program.

I love the state of Wyoming; the people are real, honest, and decent. They have nothing to gain from being part of Black-Run America (BRA), and it was in 1969 that they got the first taste of what Organized Blackness - led by Disingenuous White Liberals - would try and do to create a permanent culture of BRA (initiating an entitlement culture) for Black people on the campus of the state's flagship university.

So many other universities had problems with their Black athlete-students (a small minority of the football teams at that point) at schools like Iowa, Oregon State, Michigan, and Ohio State that the administrations of these various schools would completely capitulate to every demand made by Organized Blackness.

Flash-forward to Organized Blackness in 2011. The fear of upsetting Organized Blackness by merely pointing out rampant Black criminality (such as the Knockout King in St. Louis that is now terrorizing bicyclists there, the same evolution that Flash Mobs Mahogany Mobs of Black people in Philadelphia have moved toward) keeps any conservative leader from daring to criticize the morbid state of the Black community.

The Blaze (theblaze.com) reports that Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) members, in their tour of cities with high Black unemployment, have stated that members of the Tea Party and white people in general wish to return to the era of Jim Crow, with Blacks hanging from trees, and a completely removal of Black people's extra-equal rights.

Never mind that most conservatives - trust me, I know a lot of these people - will castrate themselves in a bid to garner just four percent more of the Black vote, throwing out anyone from their ranks who dares dissent with this moral objective. Politico recently ran a hilarious piece showing that, no matter what he does, 'the Blacks' will still support Mein Obama with monolithic zeal:
If there’s anything close to a political certainty in 2012, it’s that Barack Obama will get more than 90 percent of the African-American vote.


“You can spend a lot of time trying to win over white independents, but if you don’t pay attention to your base, African Americans, if you have not locked up your base yet, you’ve got a serious problem,” said CNN contributor Roland Martin.

“African-Americans will vote for him again, 88, 92, 95 percent. The question is what’s the turnout? I’ll vote for you. But will I bring ten other people along, like I did in 2008? That’s the danger here for him. He doesn’t have the historical factor to lean on as much in 2012 as he did in 2008… And the first step, is that he has to be willing to speak to this audience, black people.”

 Roland Martin is a rotund bigot, who only supports Mein Obama because they both are eligible for the Paper Bag Test.

Eric "My People" Holder has made it perfectly clear that racial attacks by Black people on white people  across the nation (including white people being pulled from their cars by 'the Blacks' at the Wisconsin State Fair in Milwaukee) are of little concern to the Department of (in) Justice.

John T. Bennett, writing at The American Thinker, points out that Black-on-white racial attacks is The Racial Violence that Dare Not Speak Its Name, which no officially-sanctioned organ of news dissemination will acknowledge:
There is quite simply no way for a politically correct society to grasp these events, much less effectively deal with them. Liberals have reached the depths of self-deception and self-censorship in response. The Washington Post, New York Times, and the Chicago Tribune, have all openly stated that they will refuse  to report on the racial facts of these violent crimes. The Los Angeles Times explains that they don't want to "unfairly stigmatize racial groups." They prefer the soft bigotry of low expectations instead.
White America could have stopped all of this back in the 1960s, but they capitulated to Black demands (pressed on by DWLs). We are reaching a point where more and more Black demands are being made to augment programs specifically created to help advance Black people.

Thus the need to write about college football and show the correlation to what is transpiring now - with demands from Organized Blackness coming quick and fast to offset social unrest now- with what transpired when integration finally came to the Southeastern Conference and Black athletes and radical Black leaders demanded change and standards lowered on campuses across the nation in the late 1960s.

It's beginning to smell like the late 1960s for a reason

It's time to bring on the Black 14.



44 comments:

Anonymous said...

I realize the point you are trying to make with these articles, but, please -- everywhere you turn, TV, Internet, radio, it's FOOTBALLFOOTBALLFOOTBALL 24/7. Can't we escape ***!!!FOOTBALL!!!*** here, of all places?

I mean, geez, it's a stupid _ball game_. Nothing that happens in sports matters in the real world.

I realize the typical white male is obsessed by these meaningless sports contests, but for heaven's sake is there no escape from FUUUUTBAAAWWWLLL anywhere?

If you want to write about BRA's involvement with sports, that's fine. One or two articles a year will cover it. But over and over again?

White fans demand black thug players. We get it. Let's move on.

Anonymous said...

Off-topic, but must-see...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3sTRpdQzGEc

Anonymous said...

"White fans demand black thug players. We get it. Let's move on."

You don't like sports articles.

We get it.

So move on.

John said...

Oh, by the way......... Who are the members of the Congressional Black Caucus? ALL, I repeat, ALL members, thank you.

Anonymous said...

Mahogany Mobs

http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/08/the_racial_violence_that_dare_not_speak_its_name.html

Anonymous said...

They really do seem to waging out-in-the-open war on whites. Who was it, Sheila Jackson Lee, who recently said screw you tea partiers. The blacks are upfront about the groveling and subservience they demand from whites and other races. Listen carefully and you hear it again and again. From the blacks and the DWLs. And whites can't utter one peep in defense.

And what do the tea partiers want? They simply want a return to fiscal sanity. And beyond that a return to the rule of law that made this nation great. Classical liberalism it was. Yet I have DWL friends who believe the tea party and any objection to BHOs agenda signals the rise of The Forth Reich. Actually, I have totally re-evaluated my relationships with the DWLS in my circle. But that's another post. But the election of a minority president is a huge step in the de-legitimization and dispossesion of non-liberals. Once normal discourse becomes racist our marketplace of ideas has died. This is why it was so important for the republicans to elect the first female or black president. It would have delayed the effectiveness this cancerous agitprop. But alas, no one is lamer then the republicans.

What do you think would happen if a white person, or an Asian or Hispanic, went to one of these "race circles"? What if they failed to grovel? What if one said to Jackson-Lee, why are talking to me this way? Why am I getting no respect as a sovereign human being? It would be quite a scene.

The time is coming to split this country up. Blacks and DWLs simply cannot live and let live. Their totalitarian urges can never be satisfied. It's time for them to go to their corner and for us to go to ours. Then each country can be run according to the political philosophy that it's people’s desire. That would be actual diversity. Was not this nation founded to be different? And now we are plunging headlong into Europeanism? It's clear that BRA and the Right Kind of White People will continue to prey upon and bully those who wish for peace. How their behavior not be considered imperialism and slavery? Excess aggression is warfare.

Everywhere in the world western civilization and whites are under assault in their own lands. For instance there are 57 muslim nations. There is one Sweden, one England, etc.. Why must the white nations take on all these immigrants? Why do the governments of the host nations all fail in a government’s number one priority, which is to defend the realm? Does our government defend us? Do we have equal protection under the law?

deconstructingleftism said...

Mr. Kersey, you told me at one point you were going to respond to this, but never did.

Pre-BRA, white people love sports and worship athletes. In "History of the Peleponnesian War", Thucydides describes a victorious general being welcomed with great fanfare, "as though he were an athlete." Sports are supposed to represent the highest human virtues, such as "fair play". It is then demanded that whites play sports with blacks, because it is "fair". Whites, loving sports can't resist any argument that asserts "fairness". It turns out blacks are better, much better than whites at many sports. Ergo whites now worship blacks.

The white love of sports is a "security hole".

Anonymous said...

"It turns out blacks are better, much better than whites at many sports."

Many?

Blacks are over-represented in basketball, football, and sprinting. They are under-represented (or non-existent) in almost all other sports.

And most whites do not worship blacks.

Anonymous said...

"History Always Repeats Itself: Just like the late 1960s, Organized Blackness is going to War with White America"

It seems like they're going to war with the Koreans as well!

Link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=I2wQiPcuZI4

Van said...

"Actually, I have totally re-evaluated my relationships with the DWLS in my circle."

I'm polite to the liberals that I know, whether the relationship is familial, social, or professional. But no liberal is my friend. No one who wishes to take what is mine, not for the common good but to give to another, is my friend. He is a thief with his hand in my pocket. It matters not if his MO is to break into my home, or to use the force of government. No one who wishes to disarm me, so that I cannot protect my family, is my friend. He who wishes to weaken me, and expose my family to violence, is my enemy.

The agenda of liberalism is in direct violation of my rights to life, liberty, and property. You cannot support that agenda, and call yourself my friend.

Paul's Biggest Fan said...

I don't know why people are giving Paul are hard time about focusing on athletics in college - the "athlete student." It's the irony of BRA at the college level, trickling through mainstream society that kills me.

I also loved this ad by the NCAA - "African American males who are student athletes are 10% more likely to graduate." Yeah - but they don't tell you the graduation rate number. 7.5% of black men in college graduate...that means that 8.25% of the black men that are college athletes graduate. Pathetic, either way - especially when getting in for them is easy, as is paying for it. The University of Toledo HANDS kids from black communities that graduate from their crap schools with a 3.0 gpa and takes the ACT. The catch? Gotta qualify for a Pell Grant - be po', go the college fo' free!


NCAA ad:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9UzO4DJBoWw

Toledo's program:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jBC4wx2lA_g&feature=player_embedded#!

Grad rates (2005)
http://www.kff.org/minorityhealth/upload/7541.pdf

Van said...

Paul,

You predicted Summer 2011 to be the end of BRA. While BRA is still in effect, and no major riots have occurred (less than a month to go), you were essentially correct.

The flash mob "mini-riots" all over the country have gotten some attention. People are noticing, and they are talking about race. The cheating scandals have received national attention, and while no one mentions race publicly, very few fail to notice. This is the beginning of the end.

State and local governments will see budget shortfalls. Unable to print and borrow like the Feds, they will cut services and reduce employment rolls. Black workers, overly represented, will be hit the hardest; black cities, with little tax base, will be hit the hardest.

Black leaders will continue to blame whites, especially conservatives, most especially the Tea Party. There will be even more violence.

The Presidential campaign very well could be the ugliest in US history. It will be racial. The Dems will strike first, of course (they already have). Eventually an issue will be make of Obama's record - Rev. Wright, Holder, the Black Panthers, his recent Executive Order. By this point the CBC will have forgotten all about their recent little spat with Obama. They'll be united, and fanning the flames of black rage. There will be more violence.

Expect either a large scale riot in October of 2012, or a level of "unrelated incidences" of black on white violence that can no longer be ignored. Obama will attempt to reclaim his role as uniter of the races. He will fail; it will be impossible for him to please both sides, and his catering to blacks will outweigh his attempts to say the "right things" to whites.

Obama will be soundly defeated. The Dems will accuse the GOP of massive voter fraud. The media will gleefully report the accusations, despite no supporting evidence. The riots will begin within three days.

Black Run America will be dead.

Anonymous said...

Van said...

"Actually, I have totally re-evaluated my relationships with the DWLS in my circle."

Replying to Van's response to me.

It seems we see it the same way. I'm polite, but these days I refuse to discuss anything political with them. For the life of me I can't see why friends and family members can not see how vindictive and destructive their views are to their own family. What they believe is a violation of the most basic of human rights. It is literally a death wish.

The reason I sign as artist is not just because I am an artist. I want to demonstrate that my profession does not mean I subscribe to the brain dead notion that I must conform to a certain set of beliefs. It's really something how supposedly hip artists went from being enemies of the government, outsiders, to shills for this so-called black man in the white house. It's not a co-incidence that you look at the Daily Kos or that stupid poster of Obama and it's an insipid knockoff of soviet art. It's revolting.

Being an artist, everyone assumes that I'm a big hip socialist myself. I sure hear some interesting comments.

I also come from an ethnic background that seems to guarantee membership in the lib klan and support for union thugs. How many times I've been called a traitor one cannot count!

I own a business. I have never been paid by a black customer. Stiffed every time. Stiffed like a waitress. It's a route to your own personal reparations.

Artist (I forgot to sign before)

Van said...

Artist,

Its sad that its come to this. But its exactly what its come to in the US. A few years ago I never would've predicted that I'd think this way, but the direction this country is going simply flies in the face of what it was intended to be; it flies in the face of freedom, individual liberty, self-determination. Its wrong, and its time to name our enemies and fight**.

**Figuratively speaking, of course. Wouldn't want the SPLC, Holder's Minions, or any other interlopers to think we advocate violence.

Anonymous said...

Did anyone notice Martin Luther Kings daughter said Abraham Lincoln was known for signing the Declaration of Independance?


At a ceremony to honor the opening of the new Martin Luther King Jr. Memorial in our nation's capital Friday, the late civil rights leader's daughter Bernice made an historical error that would evoke tremendous ridicule and derision if she were a conservative.

"Lincoln remembered for signing the Declaration of Independence" (video follows with transcript and commentary):


BERNICE KING: But as I close, I close with the recognition that daddy is standing, Lincoln is seated. Lincoln remembered for signing the Declaration of Independence. Daddy being remembered as standing up for truth and standing up for justice and standing up for righteousness and standing up for peace and standing up for freedom. Daddy is now standing on the National Mall in our nation’s capital.



Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2011/08/28/martin-luther-kings-daughter-lincoln-remembered-signing-declaration-i#ixzz1WYOrkKW3

Anonymous said...

Who cares about politics or the economy. It's feetsbawl season. Let's all go cheer for some overpaid blacks we have nothing in common with and spend a few hundred dollars on a jersey with their name on it. That makes us tough guys who stand up to BRA.

Anonymous said...

"Did anyone notice Martin Luther Kings daughter said Abraham Lincoln was known for signing the Declaration of Independance?"

When blacks display amazing stupidity, no one is surprised.

Plus...if you mention it...you're racist.

Stuff Black People Don't Like said...

"Who cares about politics or the economy. It's feetsbawl season. Let's all go cheer for some overpaid blacks we have nothing in common with and spend a few hundred dollars on a jersey with their name on it. That makes us tough guys who stand up to BRA."

Has anything like that been stated here? Are you reading any of entries?

Anonymous said...

"Who cares about politics or the economy. It's feetsbawl season."

Your whining is almost as bad as Diarrhea.

MuayTyson said...

These will be trying times. I urge everyone to exercise, learn a form of self defense, and to learn how to opperate a rifle and handgun. Thing may get better but my bet is they will get a lot worse before they do.

MuayTyson

MrGJG said...

"Never mind that most conservatives - trust me, I know a lot of these people - will castrate themselves in a bid to garner just four percent more of the Black vote, throwing out anyone from their ranks who dares dissent with this moral objective."

This is so true Paul. I've addressed this myself a few times here. It amazes me how these leftists insist that conservatives are hood wearing, noose carrying racists that can't wait to get their boots on some niggers neck.
Go on any, and I mean any so called conservative site and point out some of the foibles of black culture and see what happens.
I've been banned, had posts deleted, accused of racism and of being a liberal trying to make conservatives look bad.
These people are as clueless, if not more so that libs. More so because they actually believe that blacks don't require affirmative action to get ahead.
At least liberals realize blacks can't compete on a level playing field.

Snow Walker said...

Van and Artist

I totally agree with your take on relationships with DWLs. Van, I took the liberty of quoting you comment in my sidebar.

Californian said...

More so because they actually believe that blacks don't require affirmative action to get ahead.

Good point. What do conservatives think would happen if AA were to be ended? Quite possibly there would be a sector of blacks who would then work harder and compete fairly. Quite possibly there would be a sector who would see marriage and a culture of learning as viable alternatives to welfare state dependency. Quite possibly with the party being declared over, the high rates of black violent crime might be reduced to manageable levels.

But how would the great majority perform on things like civil service tests for police and fireman jobs? Or college entrance exams? In any event, why would blacks want to give up their very real privileges (AA and the rest of the race hustling) to compete in an open market?

Conservatives still can not recognize that the civil rights revolution was a fraud insofar as it was not about equality. Instead, it enshrined into law a system of racial hierarchy to be supported by the taxpayer.

The odd thing is this: for all their ranting about "liberalism," conservatives can not bring themselves to attack its centerpiece, what Paul calls BRA. But why? If AA were ended, it would go a long way to undermining one of the biggest liberal recruiting grounds in the country. And more generally, if BRA were to be ended, many DWLs would find themselves out of their cushy jobs in the bureaucracy and academia. It would also resound with peoples who are now being discriminated against by the system and gain far more votes than it would lose.

Yet conservatives are paralyzed.

Amazing.

Silent Running said...

Obama will be soundly defeated.

This depends entirely on who the Republicans run against him. Obama won in 04 for many reasons, but he certainly wasn't hurt by the fact that John McCain was a non-entity. As of right now, the Republicans don't seem to be doing anything different. Paul's a joke, Bachmann's an imbecile, Perry is madly in love with Mexicans, and Romney is the author of a precursor to Obamacare and a see-no-Islam liberal. Palin might run, but she's just as bad as all three.

It goes without saying that anyone the GOP runs will be labelled a racist. I can't think of any GOP candidate who will meet this accusation head-on. More likely he'll bend over backward to prove his anti-racist bona fides, but of course his accusers won't care a jot.

In the end, I see the vast majority of Obama-critical libs holding their collective noses to vote for their boy one more time, simply because the alternative will still be unthinkable.

Anonymous said...

Consider the following: No matter what capitulations are made to BRA, "the blacks" are simply too stupid to shut up and be satisfied. No, they continue to agitate and complain, constantly drawing attention to their willful ignorance. So, here we are forty-some years after the civil rights act and these dumb-asses are still seeking the "dream." Instead of viewing Obama as the beginning of a new era of negro-rule of the nation, he will be seen as the final example of why "the blacks" will never, in large numbers, mesh with the rest of the population. Fools like Sheila Jackson Lee, Eric Holder, and Jeremiah Wright who cannot think two seconds ahead of their arrogant need to spout their insipid negro bullshit are all contributing to the final act in this play. At some point soon, all the race-baiting, the handouts, the groveling, the posing, the whining, the shit-talking, the threats, all these things and more are going to cause an event to occur. White people will come to an initially uncomfortable realization. They will realize that there was a reason, a very real reason why, in the past, the niggers were hated and marginalized. They will realize that the downhill slide of this country started with that event in the 60's and the so called War on Poverty. They will realize that no amount of giving-in to these fools is going to help. After all this, they will realize that they don't give a fuck what "the blacks" and their white keepers say or want. At that moment everything will change.

Anonymous said...

Paul's a joke

He's a joke to dumbasses like you who repeat after the media spinmeisters. He's the only one who opposed the banker bailouts, the endless wars bankrupting this country, and the welfare state.

MrGJG said...

"The odd thing is this: for all their ranting about "liberalism," conservatives can not bring themselves to attack its centerpiece, what Paul calls BRA. But why?"

Because they're literally paralyzed at the thought of being accused of racism. They claim Martin Luther King as one of their own, without realizing he'd be no different than the black agitators of today.
I believe the majority of conservatives are aware and resentful of the problems caused by black culture, but for whatever reason, when they criticize individual blacks or black organizations, it always comes with a qualifier that most blacks are decent, law abiding people.

Take the Tea Party. They're inherently aware that they have a color deficiency problem, so they'll find a few token brothers who agree with them, and prop them up as speakers or front men.
See, we're not racists, racist's wouldn't have blacks among their leader ranks.

They don't seem to realize they're cow-towing to BRA, even if from a different angle than DWL's

Van said...

"This depends entirely on who the Republicans run against him. Obama won in 04 for many reasons, but he certainly wasn't hurt by the fact that John McCain was a non-entity. As of right now, the Republicans don't seem to be doing anything different. Paul's a joke, Bachmann's an imbecile, Perry is madly in love with Mexicans, and Romney is the author of a precursor to Obamacare and a see-no-Islam liberal. Palin might run, but she's just as bad as all three."

All the GOP has to do is NOT nominate someone like Palin - who turns off a large percentage of voters - and the election is theirs. Negative opinion on Obama is solidifying; barring a miraculous turn of events, he is done.

Obama's defeat doesn't require a candidate that true conservatives like; it requires a candidate "moderates" (aka those with no consistent beliefs) will vote for. Romney and Perry would likely do very well. Obama's presence in the White House guarantees a good turn out by conservatives and the GOP faithful.

His low approval among liberals almost guarantees relatively poor turn out for his supporters. It probably seems crazy to those of us who are passionate about politics, but enthusiasm truly affects turn out. Some won't go out and vote if they don't really like the candidate. This isn't a myth.

Eyes were opened this summer. More will be opened during the campaign. It will be clear that simply running a candidate against Obama is "racist."

And throughout, blacks will be demanding more handouts for their failed cities and counties, and committing more violence clearly directed at whites.

The title of this Post says it all - Organized Blackness is going to war with White America. This very well could be the time that most of White America realized it.

MrGJG said...

Van, I agree with much of what you post, but to call Michele Bachmann an imbecile makes you sound like Chris Mathews.
The woman has an LL.M degree in tax law.
As long as the left continues to control the dialog in this country, conservatives will always be portrayed as wild eyed, bible thumping hayseeds.

I have my own problems with conservatives, but I also know the alternative is no longer tenable.
We have to stop eating our own.

Van said...

MrGJG: "but to call Michele Bachmann an imbecile makes you sound like Chris Mathews.
The woman has an LL.M degree in tax law."

That was a quote from a previous commenter. My normal quoting style isn't that clear.

For the record, I don't think she's an imbecile, but I'm not a fan. There's just something odd about her. I think she has zero chance at the nomination, anyway.

But I don't want to hijack this post and turn it into a debate about political candidates. The point was simply that the stage is set for more nails in the coffin of BRA.

As the campaign heats up, I'd avoid any areas that blacks typically congregate. And stay vigilant and alert. There WILL be considerable black on white violence during 2012. I don't think I'm going out on a limb with that prediction; its about like predicting that there WILL be rain in 2012.

Anonymous said...

The best thing to happen on the Republican ticket:

Herman Cain for President
Ron Paul for Vice President....

Liberals won't be able to call racism at all....BRA will become a victim of its own stupidity.

Porter said...

We are reaching a point where more and more Black demands are being made to augment programs specifically created to help advance Black people.

In other words, BRA is expanding to meet the needs of the expanding BRA.

Anonymous said...

"White people will come to an initially uncomfortable realization. They will realize that there was a reason, a very real reason why, in the past, the niggers were hated and marginalized. They will realize that the downhill slide of this country started with that event in the 60's and the so called War on Poverty. They will realize that no amount of giving-in to these fools is going to help."

So very well stated. When I was younger, I never had much of an opinion one way or the other regarding black people. Having advanced to my mid-fifties and lived in D.C. and near Oakland, CA, now I get it. Black culture is a nightmare, just a feral, out of control circus of poor impulse control.

Anonymous said...

To those that keep complaining about football or sports subjects, or what ever subjects they do not like discussed, start your own site then no one can complain and you have complete control over what is discussed. You're not a victim and have the power to do what ever you want and how you want it. Being a whiny bitch about it is - well pretty ethnic. Are you a negro troll?

MrGJG said...

Apologies Van. I missed the quotation marks in your post.
Agree that she has minimal chance of getting the nomination, which is a good thing as she's almost as polarizing as Sarah Palin.

Anonymous said...

Never mind that most conservatives - trust me, I know a lot of these people - will castrate themselves in a bid to garner just four percent more of the Black vote, throwing out anyone from their ranks who dares dissent with this moral objective.

Most far-leftists are retarded. They don't see how so called mainstream "conservatism" is liberal at the core. Most mainstream "conservatives" today are classical liberals and right-liberals e.g. Tea Partiers, libertarians, neoconservatives.

They make up stuff and misinterpret people like Glenn Beck and Sarah Palin being extremists but in reality these people are pretty moderately liberal.

D J said...

I am in a place right now where there is no affirmative action. Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur to be specific. It is a multi-racial, and multi-cultural society, and yet everyone at least seems to be getting along quite well. Muslims and Christians working together, associating with one another, etc. Indians, Malay, Chinese, Whites, et al. All have been the height of courtesy and manners.

The only Negroes I have seen here have been busboys, janitors, or restroom attendants. They, too, have been polite, but it is a different kind of polite. It is the polite of the submissive. It is one of being scared that if they are not, they will be punished. In short: they have a place here, and it is at the bottom. They do not DARE raise their hand to others.

I never thought I would live to say this, but: this is as it should be.

Analytical said...

No AA in Malaysia?  You have obviously never heard the word bumiputera (or bhumiputra).

On the other hand, bumiputera is exactly opposite from the situation in N. America.  If the USA had a bumiputera system, Blacks, Mexicans, Asians and Jews would be disfavored compared to Whites.  Which is probably as it should be, for at least as long as it's been since "civil rights" became "diversity" preferences and racial quotas.

D J said...

Analytical: I am Jewish, at least by heritage.

I will also put my DNA up against yours any day of the week if we want to start talking who is "White".

Because it seems to matter to you, I am likely more Aryan than most of the comment writers on this blog will ever hope to be. My father looked like he stepped off an SS recruiting poster (and had the bloodlines to justify it), and my mother came from similar lineage.

Not all of us are hook-nosed curly-haired connivers. Not by a long shot. Damn of us bow at the feet of bastards like Abe Foxman or that clown Potok at the SPLC. We didn't want our schools ruined and our neighborhoods trashed.

More of us are your allies than you may realize, and you would know it if you pulled your head out of your racially pure ass.

Discard said...

D J: Having lived in Los Angeles during the rise of the Waxman-Berman Jewish political machine, your comments intrigue me. The public face of American Jewry is anti-racist, that is, anti-White. The Waxman-Berman crowd exemplified this, establishing affirmative action programs in L.A. with gusto, and all the while seeing that their fellow Jews could hog the trough. My personal observations on this were confirmed by an approving article by Fred Barnes in the The New Republic back in June 1986.
On a national scale, the Jewish presence on the Left is overwhelming, and the Jewish neoconservatives are really just moderate liberals, as they claimed 30 years ago.

So, my question is, how many Jews are pro-White? I would welcome Jewish allies, if there were any to be found. My experience in L.A. tells me that Jews by and large are enemies of White America, and my reading about the wider world confirms that view. I don't need to cite chapter and verse here, any casual examination will show Jews to be prominent if not dominant in the multi-cult. I know this is a site about Blacks, but if SBPDL will allow it, I'd like to have a civil discussion. The White race would be greatly strengthened by Jewish support instead of Jewish opposition, and I'd like to see that come about, but how?

Analytical said...

Mention "Jews" as people who would probably be best kept in their own milieu for the sake of a peaceful, orderly and pro-White White society, and the immediate reaction from a Jew is "THE COSSACKS ARE COMING!!!!!1!eleven!"

Predictable.  And I tend to like Jewish people too.

MrGJG said...

The Jew thing, more than anything else, is what keeps me from endorsing White Nationalism (WN) in it's purist form.
I know too many Jews who do not fit the WN definition of world domination.
Yes, Discard is right, if you look at the agitators of the civil rights movement as well as the names of the people who shape public opinion, Jews are at the forefront.
I don't believe it's a concerted effort on the part of Jews as much as it's a liberal white elitist thing that alot of Jews happen to be preeminent.
I think the WN model is ultimately throwing out the baby with the bathwater.

Anonymous said...

Demonization of Jews is the single biggest obstacle to a much more expanded, widespread white racial consciousness. It completely drains the energy away from the real and pressing threat - black and leftist anti-white racism and anti-white violence. Many, many whites are upset about black behavior but what do the "Aryan" kooks tell them? "It's the Joooos! The Jooooos!!" It's a turn off, to say the least, and kills credibility. It's totally idiotic and strategically destructive in every way.

Anti-semitic rants only confirm to people that the speaker is a psycho with no credibility. It's a great way to take someone from "Yeah, PC anti-white racism is out of control" to "Uh, yeah, I gotta go." Jews are not flash mobbing and kicking the shit out of people in the streets! And everyone knows that! Blacks are and that is what people are pissed off and concerned about and for good goddamn reason.

I've known Jews all my life and, the truth is, they are standard issue white people. They are overwhelmingly law-abiding and intelligent people who positively contribute to our society and who, more often than not, see blacks as clearly and realistically as any other whites. They're not scheming power brokers pulling our strings. Most are working to pay the bills like anybody else. Howling about Jews and blaming them for everything under the sun at the same time we've got blacks raping, robbing and murdering us like crazy is stupidity of a very extreme kind.

Anonymous said...

I don't believe it's a concerted effort on the part of Jews as much as it's a liberal white elitist thing that alot of Jews happen to be preeminent.

It IS a liberal white elitist thing. I've lived most of my life in wealthy areas of California and have known a lot of high income Democrats. Very, very few of them are Jews. In fact, many liberals in Marin County and San Francisco are extreme Jew-haters. They'd love to see Israel wiped off the map.

They're elitist, pseudo-hippy assholes who vote for every stupid tree-hugging, white-hating politician and ballot proposition they can. They HATE middle and lower income white people because they're snobs.

This subject is a very frustrating subject to me because I know these people first hand and I know how destructive they are and Jews and Jewishness don't have a fucking thing to do with it. Old school, "summer of love" white leftist assholes are the power brokers and they are the problem.