Monday, January 23, 2012

The Disintegration of America: Part II

PK Note: Comfortably numb. That's how I feel right now. Reading about the violence escalating in Philadelphia (could the fictional Rocky Balboa even train there safely now?), New Orleans, Chicago, St. Louis... you begin to realize we are one incident away, when the wrong person is attacked by youths Black people merely playing a simple game of Knockout King.


I read the stories of all these crimes (can't comment on... all of them), waiting patiently for some elected official to say... something. None do. None ever will. Well, SBPDL is pleased to publish part II of Zenster's "The Disintegration of America." We hope you enjoy it. Tomorrow, we'll start with old school # posts. Oh, and for those claiming Red Tails was a box office success, you might want to rethink that claim: Tyler Perry movies usually pull in $25 - $30 million opening week, with considerable less in marketing dollars (or free, sycophantic marketing dollars via glowing newspapers articles and documentaries), and without schools closing to take students to see fiction peddled as truth. Red Tails had a budget of $58 million and a marketing/distribution budget of $35 million (all paid for by George Lucas). It made $19 million opening night, largely due Black people launching a Twitter to see the movie opening week. Prediction: Red Tails drops 70 percent in box office revenue next week.


As a matter of history, the Fourteenth Amendment was not understood to ban segregation on the basis of race.
― Cass Sunstein ―
(Current Administrator of the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs)

This section will examine the origins of segregation plus how a growing sense of entitlement is washing over America, particularly with respect to Blacks, but also in other parts of the population and the negative effects it has on social cohesion.

The Myth of Integration

The original and successful “integration” of America is largely an illusion brought about by the fact that a vast majority of early immigrants ― despite varying appearances and faiths ― still shared in common a largely Western European moral or spiritual framework. This provided a basic degree of mutual interest and lent genetic cohesion to an otherwise substantial population shift in the New World.

More recently arrived Black and Asian influxes posed issues that would prove increasingly problematic but, back then, were held in check by relatively strict and somewhat mutually agreed upon social segregation. However, almost all ethnic groups exhibited a degree of “enclave mentality”. This manifested as “Chinatown”, “Little Italy” plus districts for Irish, Scandinavian and other ethnic groups.

The so-called “melting pot” of America worked back then due to a predominantly European cultural milieu. Non-European populations typically did not intermingle as much and this minimal contact helped to curtail potential racial friction. America’s European immigrants slowly intermarried and this bled off a large amount of tensions that otherwise might have arisen.

Consistent with this existing social structure, actual government policies were put in place to ensure a lack of friction. Dating from 1937, CHA (Chicago Housing Authority) guidelines known as the “Neighborhood Composition Rule”, required that tenants of a given federally subsidized housing development must reflect the same race as people living in the environs of where it was to be located.

In light of how vulnerable midcentury inner cities were to arson and other riot-related havoc, the “Neighborhood Composition Rule” made a degree of sense. Awkward placement of subsidized housing recipients could have sown the seeds for racial confrontations that might just as easily have turned violent.

The “Great Society” and Big Government

Should anyone think that this sort of “social management” represented a new peak in paternalistic government, please consider the breathtaking scope of Lyndon Johnson’s plans. Here is a partial list of “Great Society ” programs.

• Medicare and Medicaid (as amendments to the Social Security Act)
• Economic Opportunity Act
• Office of Economic Opportunity
• Community Action Agencies
• Elementary and Secondary Education Act
• Higher Education Act
• Model Cities Program
• Housing and Urban Development Act
• Urban Mass Transit Act
• Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (Food Stamps)
• National Endowments for the Arts
• National Endowments for the Humanities
• Wilderness, Endangered Species, and Federal Water Pollution Control Acts

Consider in detail then, how these new agencies gave the Federal government unprecedented powers of intervention with respect to what were once largely state-arbitrated matters. Just that last item alone, a forerunner to the EPA (Environmental Protection Agency), has seen numerous important state projects halted over supposedly endangered life forms of sometimes nearly microscopic dimensions.

This was Big Government on an unmatched scale in all of American history. It also represented a considerable dilution of America’s once principally Capitalistic free market economy through the injection of so many Socialist measures. The problematic aspects of expanding government to such a major extent have only now begun to show up on the electorate’s radar. This growth in the federal system also signaled a tremendous paradigm shift in who voted for whom and when.

During this most recent economic recovery, the federal government has been the only noteworthy source of new job creation. With almost two million employees in 2009, there are now plans afoot to create another 273,000 “mission critical jobs” over the next three years. This represents a 41% increase over the same figures contained in a 2007 survey.

It is vital to remember that government workers are tax consumers who live on the public’s payroll. Very few federal employees generate any actual revenue beyond that garnered by tax collection. The financial impact of this surge in government hiring will not be felt for many years even though its more immediate influence is sure to be visible at the polls. There is little doubt about how federal employees will tend to vote when there is any question about growing the government.

In this we encounter a fundamental conflict of interest which is little different from how our politicians habitually vote themselves pay increases. The most profound inconsistency resides in how the Public Employees Union has little, if any, incentive to oppose increases in pay and benefits despite how these escalating costs threaten to destroy America’s economic health. Unlike private sector workers, there is no perceived chance of driving their employer, the government, out of business with demands for more wages and better retirement plans.

The reason for pointing this out arises from how there is also manifesting a voting alliance between government workers and those whose survival is tied to public-paid benefits like welfare and Social Security. That the federal government hires a disproportionate number of minorities lends a special emphasis to this issue. Ensconced tax consumers are de facto pro-Socialists, as no other form of governance could possibly support them.

Back to the Plantation

It has long been apparent that the traditionally Liberal Democratic Party has a deliberate strategy of appealing to the poor through advocacy for increased spending on programs involving social benefits. Lyndon Johnson’s “Great Society” is a pluperfect example of this. Another voting bloc with a keen interest in social benefits is that of naturalized immigrants. The typically lower incomes of these two groups assure that they will more frequently rely upon social benefits and, therefore, vote for Democratic Party candidates.

By encouraging an “Open Door” policy to swell the ranks of immigrant citizens, America’s Democratic Party has effectively enlarged their voter base. Between increased government hiring and spending, there is a strong inflationary effect upon the economy such that this can pose negative consequences for private sector job creation. Thus, by exacerbating poverty and increasing the number of those who depend upon government largess, the Democratic Party creates, in effect, Mendicant Voter Plantations.

This was far more apparent in the age of large-scale urban housing projects and, as a consequence of ensuing negative publicity, Democratic Party members recently have sought to camouflage this rather grasping ploy by distributing Section 8 housing recipients into the suburbs of major cities. All of which is driving a renewed round of White flight as what were once exclusively White enclaves fall victim to the crime and lowered quality of life that an increased minority presence so often can bring along with it.

Furthermore, there is no longer any need for large urban housing projects. The Federal government is already so heavily Liberal ― with many Republicans being RINO (Republican In Name Only) ― that, while racial gerrymandering still exists, concentrating Black voters within a single district is not of such vital importance with regard to getting minority politicians into office. The massive number of underwater homes ― a curious byproduct of Democratic Party policies and programs ― has also contributed to an increase in residences available for Section 8 housing. Finally, expanded transit systems ― recall that “Great Society” Urban Mass Transit Act ― has made it possible to achieve the dual Liberal goals of exporting urban mendicant voters into areas with less burdened social services ― read: self-supporting White enclaves ― and simultaneously desegregating such areas by force.

This peremptory imposition of “diversity” only serves to increase racial tensions and, accordingly, grows government by requiring increased hiring of law enforcement and social service officers in areas where such involuntary “cultural enrichment” happens. Again, this municipal hiring swells the ranks of tax consumers and only increases that burden which is carried by the ever-thinning ranks of tax producers.

Liberal policy-making and programs consistently reflect a strong vulnerability to The Law of Unintended Consequences, something that LBJ’s experience in Vietnam should have made him keenly aware of. Fighting racism with compulsory desegregation only strengthens the enclave mentality. Attempting to end poverty with expanded government programs increases the tax burden for productive citizens and deters overall job creation. Examples of this Liberal failing are as numerous as they are varied.

Dis-Integration Arrives

If Jared Taylor’s observation is true; namely, that “the statistics for residential segregation in the United States are almost identical to what they were fifty or sixty years ago”, then what ultimate effect does this new form of forced integration have upon communities? It is already apparent that neighborhoods with a higher degree of racial “diversity” inherently will experience more divergent political and personal interests which can just as readily compromise any existing sense of social cohesion. Divergence of this sort is an automatic predictor of potential conflict.

One immediate outcome is an “atomization” of personal relationships. A community’s fabric loses its tightness of weave and thereby, its strength. This frequently promotes the sort of anonymity more commonly associated with urban environments. Such "facelessness" is a vital ingredient for criminal activity that is more often suppressed in tightly knit communities where an individual’s reputation has a greater effect upon their social and financial standing.

This fracturing of social unity more strongly affects Whites than it does other minorities specifically because they are minorities and already experience differing goals from both other ethnic groups and Whites as well. The inherent fragmentation of minority interests is merely a fait accompli while it is an absolute poison for White society. On an increasing basis any protest regarding this purposeful dismantling of White solidarity is hysterically shouted down with screeches of “racism”.

This slur is only given even more effectiveness by the cottage industry that has sprung up around racial “discrimination”. Hypocritical race baiters like Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson have made lucrative careers out of inflating White Man’s Burden. With typical Black shortsightedness, little did they begin to suspect how their shameless race-mongering would set the stage for a mass rejection by Whites of this fossilized encumbrance from America’s slave era.

White Man’s Burden


After decades of being milked like the last cow on the farm, White Man’s Burden is rapidly losing its ability to inflict any guilt. All of this has been accelerated by a dawning awareness on the part of Whites that not only has this social engineering experiment with integration-at-gunpoint cost America countless trillions of dollars; it has also failed in a spectacular manner. Along with this failure has come a growing resentment for the continued inability of Blacks to productively utilize the immense largesse of White America in any meaningful way.

The Black community’s persistent poverty, high illegitimacy rates, habitual criminality and disproportionate incarceration statistics rather pointedly indicate that little to no progress has been made, nor is it forthcoming. Instead, despite its munificence, White America has only borne silent witness to an increased sense of entitlement among Blacks. This grasping arrogance has become so pronounced that such behavior now inspires slang terminology such as “gibsmedat” and other less polite expressions. Websites like unamusementpark.com, chimpout.com and niggermania.net stand as stark testimony to how fed up Whites and other races have become with, what is known in the vernacular as, TNB (Typical Nigger Behavior).

Neither has this sense of entitlement confined itself to Blacks. Having experienced an unprecedented half century or more of heretofore unknown prosperity, security and abundance, today’s American youth of all colors demonstrate precious little appreciation for the ultimate sacrifices which were made on their behalf; so that they could enjoy life in such full measure.

One indication of this spreading sense of entitlement comes from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York whose recent report cites how Americans now owe more on student loans than on credit cards. This is no small matter as student loan debt cannot be shed through bankruptcy and, if left in default, can see the average graduation-day total of $24,000 literally double in short order. Standing now at one trillion dollars it is, in effect, a looming credit bubble with borrowers bearing the brunt this time instead of bailed-out lenders.

The downstream implications of this are substantial as debt-burdened graduates will be obliged to forestall life milestones like buying a car or house and getting married or having children. All of which promises, in turn, to further depress an already flagging economy. Getting today’s students to carefully consider accepting government assistance is not helped by having a Black minority that has made such a very conspicuous career out of riding upon the coattails of productive citizens and does so in an entirely obnoxious manner.

The Luxury of American Poverty

Nor is it helpful that newly arrived immigrants are treated to this spectacle of thankless greed. Such overt hostility displayed towards Whites masks the simple fact of how supposedly “poverty stricken” American Blacks experience a standard of living which exceeds that of most other nations on earth.

As scholar James Q. Wilson has stated, “The poorest Americans today live a better life than all but the richest persons a hundred years ago.” In 2005, the typical household defined as poor by the government had a car and air conditioning. For entertainment, the household had two color televisions, cable or satellite TV, a DVD player, and a VCR. If there were children, especially boys, in the home, the family had a game system, such as an Xbox or a PlayStation. In the kitchen, the household had a refrigerator, an oven and stove, and a microwave. Other household conveniences included a clothes washer, clothes dryer, ceiling fans, a cordless phone, and a coffee maker.

Presented with the prospect of such tremendous payoffs, it is not difficult to imagine how many other immigrants may subconsciously absorb a similar reflex in automatically labeling any conflicting White behavior as “racism”. That White Liberals are so indoctrinated by Cultural Marxism to the point of abject self-loathing

Given that America’s existing Black population poses so many detrimental factors, it defies all logic and reason that this nation is currently importing hordes of African nationals. Such illogicality is further compounded by the fact that many of these African immigrants are totally illiterate, both cognitively and technologically. None of which even addresses how they are often arriving from Islamic cultures which are brazenly antagonistic to all aspects of Western civilization. Again, much of this is a direct result of Liberal Democrats cultivating tax consuming Mendicant Voter Plantations at the direct expense of White Middle Class tax producers.

Unrestricted immigration has also contributed to a resurgence of the once-fading enclave mentality. This is especially the case due to how so many of these new immigrants come from non-European countries that have very little racial diversity. Cultural incompatibility at the most basic levels only increases how inappropriate this is. Just as American Chinatowns slowly were becoming a thing of the past, many major cities are seeing fairly clear divisions of turf into renewed ethnic warrens.

No single group exemplifies this more than recent Muslim immigrants. In European cities, this enclave mentality has spiked among Islam’s followers to the point of their creating so-called “No-Go Zones”. Non-Muslims, called kafirs, who enter such areas risk physical assault or worse; this includes law enforcement and emergency services personnel as well. While more prevalent in Europe, sections of Dearborn, Michigan are exhibiting the precursors of this phenomenon.

In this we find an exceptional example of immigrants purposefully driving segregation. Yet, any criticism by Whites over forming such intrinsically closed societies is immediately met with shrieks of “racism”. This is made all the more peculiar by the fact that Islam is not a race. None of which deters mass media from parroting this patently false accusation of “racism” whenever it encounters what is, otherwise, well-justified Islamophobia.

Equally, if not more alarming, is the fact that many Muslim immigrants have absolutely no intention of assimilating or integrating into their host cultures. Their “No-Go Zones” are total proof of this. What then to make of their so-called “immigration? There can only be one conclusion and it applies to all non-assimilating immigrants; they are not immigrating, they are colonizing.

This issue of colonization bears repeating because the equivalent arrangements found in Hispanic barrios and Black slums usually replicate this sort of “No-Go” environment, often for people of any other race. The Muslim “No-Go Zones” are particularly instructive due to how there is no possible way that Whites can be blamed for enforcing any degree of poverty involved, which is the common excuse for why such ghettoes exist in the first place.

So, there it is in plain language: ”Segregation for minority me but not for White thee”. This is just one more reflection of the iniquitous Liberal dictum that “only Whites can be racist”. If minorities practice de facto segregation, Liberals will claim that is just an ostensible way of “preserving their cultural identity”, but when Whites seek to obtain an identical result it is roundly condemned as the most virulent racism imaginable. This despicable double standard is a principal driver with respect to “The Dis-Integration of America”.

81 comments:

Anonymous said...

Well put, verrry well put. Thank you for elucidating so clearly the thoughts that have been swirling in my head as a soup of discomfort and anger. It is refreshing to have it distilled so nicely, as my emotional distress over this disintegration has left me dizzied and unable to coherently argue the point. I have been depressed to see the recent results of so much time devoted to multiculturalism and diversity, but I am feeling better knowing that I am far from alone in being distrurbed to the core by it. Thank you, Paul, for posting this fine piece by Zenster, and thank you Zenster for taking the time to write it so well.

Anonymous said...

Great article. Loved the niggermania plug =D

By the way, DC Entertainment is calling on Whitey to take up the White Man's Burden to once again save the race of failures.

http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=86224#commentLstTop

Yes, comments are allowed. Have fun as I have.

Anonymous said...

Zenster-disagree with the Great Society being the largest expansion of federal power up to that time in the U.S.

Lincoln interfering with a states right to secede takes the prize. The Civil War ended the true idea of the United States.

Zenster said...

Paul, please accept my thanks for posting this latest work of mine. I really appreciate you sharing this well-trafficked venue so that my writings can reach so many new readers.

Anonymous said...

Well, the easy thing to do would be to stop LEGAL immigration and forcibly expel illegal aliens.

But you'd sooner have the sun go nova than either one of these things happening soon.

Anonymous said...

Southern Indiana...

Good analysis Zenster.

Can we be sure that what one would consider "unintended consequences" are not actually perceived by those who enact legislation?

Edwood said...

If minorities practice de facto segregation, Liberals will claim that is just an ostensible way of “preserving their cultural identity”, but when Whites seek to obtain an identical result it is roundly condemned as the most virulent racism imaginable.

So true...When my sister and her husband were looking for their first house they were not-so-subtly informed that they would not fit in one of the neighborhoods they looked at...by the Asian realtor.

Playing Roots Backwards said...

Foreclosed houses have become magnets for integration in many White neighborhoods. Sometimes, as zenster pointed out, Section 8 vouchers are the culprit. Other times the low prices of many foreclosed homes allow undesirables to buy their way into neighborhoods that were previously beyond their means.

Way, way back when I was a teen it was not uncommon for kids to claim vacant homes for party houses. Since the power was off, light was often provided by candles. Partying kids and candles can be a bad combination, so sometimes the houses burned down.

That was terrible and regrettable in those gentle times, but not now.

I think the fire inspectors always determined that the fires were caused by partying kids because there were always beer and wine bottles and maybe the remains of a mattress or sleeping bag found in the rubble.

Details are important.

Zenster said...

Anonymous (January 23, 2012 7:43 PM): Well put, verrry well put. Thank you for elucidating so clearly the thoughts that have been swirling in my head as a soup of discomfort and anger.

Please rest assured that this means a lot to me.

It is refreshing to have it distilled so nicely, as my emotional distress over this disintegration has left me dizzied and unable to coherently argue the point.

It's one of the reasons that I devote so much time to scribbling up these tracts. And it is gratifying in the extreme to find that others have obtained a sense of "crystallization" from them.

I have been depressed to see the recent results of so much time devoted to multiculturalism and diversity, but I am feeling better knowing that I am far from alone in being disturbed to the core by it.

You are not alone, trust me.

… thank you Zenster for taking the time to write it so well.

You are more than welcome. At the risk of boring some here at SBPDL, I seek ― through both contributions and comments ― to help the Race Realism community in consolidating its agenda so that there can be established robust and persuasive memes that will help serve as "power tools" in the ongoing debates that all of us enter into. Especially so with respect to the "fence sitters" that are most in need of convincing.

If I may say so, the "biggie" from this Part II is:

Segregation for minority me but not for White thee

Imagine the interminable howling that would ensue if municipal governments insisted upon non-Muslim students being bussed into predominantly Muslim school districts. Try to picture the violence that would result if Section 8 vouchers were issued for residences in neighborhoods that are currently Muslim "no go zones".

This is the sort of horse puckey we must fight at every turn. If Whites cannot enjoy their own ethnic enclaves, then all other enclave constituencies must find themselves subject to de jure integration, just like we Whites are experiencing at present.

Equal application of the law, eh wot?

Anonymous said...

"fter decades of being milked like the last cow on the farm, White Man’s Burden is rapidly losing its ability to inflict any guilt."

Without authority, responsibility makes one a whipping boy.

Californian said...

During the Great Society years, many white Americans bought into the concept of a color blind societies. And maybe some minorities did also. But the leadership of those minorities, from MLK down to Al Sharpton, maintained their own race based struggles for power. Since whites abandoned the struggle, the political high ground was ceded without much of a fight to the race hustlers.

Obviously, for a color blind society to work, everyone has to go along with it. All it takes is a militant minority with a determined leadership to take advantage of the situation. Which is pretty much what has happened.


This is made all the more peculiar by the fact that Islam is not a race.

"Racism" is defined by the other side as anything that would defend Western or white peoples.

I'll state the obvious. The other side correctly sees this as a race-based struggle, with race defined in its broader sense. White people (or at least their leaders) refuse to understand this reality. Or maybe they understand it but support it for their own reasons.

You also make a good point about the increase in black dysfunction: illegitimacy, crime, drop out rates, whatever. All this after a half century of every social program imaginable, and the kowtowing of the media, corporate and academic systems. Moreover, unlike the Great Society years, there is no reason to expect that the future will be different. The entire country seems to be swimming in circles insofar as the inner cities disintegrate, hoping the sharks circling them will not notice.

Lily White said...

Excellent piece, Zenster. You nailed it, as usual.

"White Man's Burden" appears to be a nonstop browbeating for daring to exist. Every other race is told it's perfectly fine to "celebrate" their heritage and culture (or lack thereof.) Woe be to those eeeevil white European descendants who might want to do a little celebrating on their own.

Anonymous said...

Another well thought out thread. Thank you Zenster. You managed to put into words what I am sure a lot of people already know, experienced or have observed.
I also enjoyed what you posted in the comments in the thread: Coleman Young’s Detroit. I grew up in Detroit and I witnessed and experienced the sad fate of Detroit. I experienced indoctrination in the public schools on how we are all one and how we are all enriched by diversity. I had one sociology professor in college even lecture us evil racist suburbanites contributed to black pathologies and how all the blacks would become upstanding citizens if we just allowed ourselves to be integrated. His neighborhood at the time was predominately Jewish. I have to hand it to him, he did back up his words with action. I later saw about ten years later, his neighborhood was all black, unlivable and he was trying to sell his house to get to a safe neighborhood 25 miles further out from Detroit. Even at a young age, I could never understand why liberal multicult diversity, was being forced down our throats when it so obviously failed and did nothing for the black problem. Like you said, ‘some people are not on speaking terms with the truth’.
I am really interested, and wish you would write more, about where this liberal theology started, what they hope to achieve and why even our government enforces positive discrimination. Was this just an effort to gain more power? If it is, they themselves being white will not keep that power for long. These DWL cannot stay isolated from the actions of their pets forever and whatever power they gain will not last forever. Importing voters seems like it will on work for a short time or until the importers start voting for their own president for life like Mugabe. Liberalism really seems to be a mental disease. A clear sign of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results. Never forget, Adolf Hitler was one of the greatest progressive in the history of the world.

Anonymous said...

'• National Endowments for the Arts'
= Piss Christ and other anti Christian 'treasures'....

Anonymous said...

This is one of yr best and should be required reading for all 4th graders!

Leftists also bemoan 'enclaves' [that they may live in]
But dont connect immigrants / black crime to the rich seeking refuge..
or if they dont I dont hear it on NPR!

Anonymous said...

Beautiful post... to me, the core problem of all this madness is that non-whites don't recognize the right to live to white people! they don't care if it is Europe, Australia or whatever, we don't deserve to live, because to them we are the source of all their problems... so we deserve their rage and every evil act that they do to us. This retarded view it's fueled by liberals and other traitors using television, news papers and so on. Anyway, what bother me even more is that non-whites in general don't view our technology, culture etc. as ours, they think it's everybody's technology! i mean, just go to Japan, they are surrounded by white inventions, culture, clothes, but they think that's japanese technology etc. whatever whites have ever made has been exploited for the benefit of billions of people from other races, they just don't know who they really are lol tell to blacks that their people still live in mud huts even today, they will tell you that you are racist, that is white people's fault, that the egyptians were black lmao

dondiego said...

I'd like to share a video- showing The White Mans Burden/TNB as it applies to me in the South Pacific.

No 2nd Amendment style laws in New Zealand.
Where you call them the "Undertow" we label them "Underclass".

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rhbdVzh4WzE&feature=g-hist&context=G2db87fbAHTx5FHAAAAA

Anonymous said...

NJ Governor Chris Christie loves diversity.

He appointed Black Homo and an Asian to the NJ Supreme Counrt for the sake of "Diversity."

Link: http://philadelphia.cbslocal.com/2012/01/23/new-jersey-governor-christie-picks-gay-black-man-asian-for-top-court/

Zenster said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Caiden said...

I'm not sure it will be one incident, per se, it will be hundreds of small ones, the way it is now. What may happen is the chimps will attack an armed person and a few chimps hit the concrete, dead.

The media will pounce on the person defending himself, bringing up his high school grades, his facebook comment, his hair style, anything to demonize him. Look at Joe the Plumber, just a guy who didn't fawn over Obama, and the media spent more time investigating him then obama.

This will be noticed by everyone, and while we don't have the numbers to make editorials or dictact what's said on news shows like the liberals can, more and more people are aware we're being lied to and manipulated.

Hundred of robbed, raped, and murdered humans at the hands of blacks is now the norm. One armed human defending himself, however, isn't, and the left will try to crush whoever isn't a willing victim. That's when things really get bad, I think.

Most people are pretending there is nothing to worry about. Once they realize not only is there something to worry about, but they're being made unable to defend themselves, even legally, then normal people will riot.

The government is only safe if it has legitimacy in the eyes of the citizens. The Fast and Furious debacle was a wake up call to alot of people the Democrats are anti-American.

Anonymous said...

white people have no future

get used to it

Anonymous said...

"Black-Run America"!:

http://www.myfoxdfw.com/dpp/news/black-leader%E2%80%99s-past-sparks-controversy-012312

Black Leader’s Past Sparks Controversy

Published : Monday, 23 Jan 2012, 8:22 PM CST

Richard Ray
FOX 4 News


DALLAS - Dallas County Commissioners have delayed the vote on a controversial member of the county’s Homeland Security Committee.

Aaron McCarthy was appointed to an initial term in September and was up for another two-year term. But then someone brought up his past.

McCarthy, who also used the name Aaron Michaels, is credited with founding the New Black Panther Party in Dallas. It’s an organization that disrupted school board meetings in Dallas in the 1990s and has drawn criticism from the anti-defamation league.

The county said McCarthy was selected by Commissioner John Wiley Price based on his extensive emergency training and work with emergency agencies that include the Federal Emergency Management Agency.

Commissioners delayed Tuesday’s vote while they gather more public input.

maximum bob said...

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/business/2012/01/friendless-and-nearly-broke-terrell-owens-says-im-in-hell/

80 million pissed away, the definition of ni$$arich

AnalogMan said...

dondiego, the White man's burden is light in New Zealand. I know your underclass likes to ape the negro, but they don't really have what it takes in terms of destructive potential.

I implore you, when your government decides that you really need to import African refugees from the hell that they have created in Zimbabwe (and they will), resist them with all your power.

Zenster said...

Gotta take this one out of turn, folks.

Anonymous (January 24, 2012 8:10 AM): white people have no future

get used to it


Then you have no future, jerkwit.

To paraphrase Issac Asimov:

Kill all the politicians and everybody is happy.

Kill all the Whites and everybody dies.

Try to imagine what this planet would look like if Communist China were the world's policeman.

Nuff said.

Anonymous said...

white cries of “oppression” is a classic example of privileged people defending their privilege by taking on the mantle of victimhood, acting as if resistance to their privilege somehow constitutes misunderstanding, bigotry, and oppression.

Anonymous said...

I say to the white people, stand up straight, hold your arms out and keep very still so that you don’t frighten those chickens when they come home to roost.

Also, why is it that pills we dish are the same pills we find so very hard to swallow?

Zenster said...

Author's Note: Everyone, please do not miss clicking the link to Victor Gillam's superb cartoon of "White Man's Burden". There are less-than-subtle details that only emerge in the full-screen version of this image.

Spoiler: Should anyone be unaware, that red and white clad chap leading Uncle Sam up uphill towards the outstretched beacon of "Liberty" and "Education" is the British icon "John Bull".

Also, if someone can tease out what is written on the Arab's kefiya, that would be great. It sort of looks like "Bedouin", but it's hard to tell.

Zenster said...

Anonymous (January 23, 2012 8:15 PM): Lincoln interfering with a states right to secede takes the prize. The Civil War ended the true idea of the United States.

Like Blacks and slavery, this may be something that people just have to get over and get on with things.

What would you suggest as a practicable remedy for this?

Sheila said...

Zenster, I want to address and challenge a point you make early in your essay, that of earlier White immigrant assimilation, while most other commenters are focusing on more recent, non-White immigration.

At the time the Republic was founded the population was majority English (60+%), with substantial minorities of Scots, Welsh, and German (see here). The Irish began to arrive en mass in the 1840s, and German Jews in the 1860s. In 1870, America was 87% White and 13% Black, with 14% foreign born (see here). Before the essential cessation of immigration from 1920-1940 brought the American-born share of the population to 91% in 1940, fully 40% of the White population in 1915 consisted of foreign-born immigrants and their children.

While the host population did insist on a minimum degree of assimilation in those days (for a history of public education and its conceptual purpose in assimilating the foreign-born and training them to be efficient state servants, see Gatto's history here), few have questioned what assimilation truly is and to what degree it is truly successful. I would posit that the famed Ellis Islanders (Jews, Irish, Italians) have in general assimilated only minimally. Those who left the larger cities and/or coasts tended to merge into the larger population both ethnically and culturally far better than those that remained in ethnic enclaves. I realize our generous host, PK, does not want a re-hashing of Jews' continuing "outsider" ethos here, but readers might consider the degree of American integration of someone like Antonin Scalia versus the trash t.v. personality "Snookie."

My ultimate point is that we constantly judge someone's degree of assimilation based on superficial concepts such as speech and/or dress. How often does one read, of the latest Muslim jihadi, that he was "just like everyone else" and wore jeans and ate pizza. When discussing this with my not-particularly mature 12 year old the other day, even HE understood my point. The differences are genetic (and culture derives from genetic and racial origin, not the other way around) or, as popular short-hand has it, "in the blood." Rudyard Kipling said it far better than I, in his brilliant poem The Stranger. As my here prescient 12 year old noted, while we look at the outside, God looks at the inside.

People are different, even White people. I'm not truly a "kinist," but only in America is the concept of a generic White American "race" or nation as a source of identity extant. It is a recent invention as the world goes, and its degree of success is debatable. Too many well-meaning fools mourn that if only we still insisted on assimilation, everything would be hunky-dory. As I noted in my talk with my young son, even if a particular Black was a Christian and shared my deep-seated conservative convictions, I would not want my child to marry that individual because the differences are inside, in the blood, inherent in human genetics. This is the basic premise of HBD - it is not intrinsic White superiority, far less the desire to dominate other races; it is the acceptance of irremovable differences and the then subsequent and rational desire for separation/segregation.

I think, when discussing "diversity" and "American disintegration," one needs to go back further than the infamous immigration act of 1965. The seeds of our demise were sown long before.

(Hope all my attempted links work; I'm a novice and this is one of my first efforts at using them.)

Zenster said...

Southern Indiana: Can we be sure that what one would consider "unintended consequences" are not actually perceived by those who enact legislation?

As more time passes without America's political leadership taking note of the now several elephants in the room (i.e., Race Realism, Immigration, Islam, Over-Concentration of Wealth, etc.), it becomes increasingly difficult to call the consequences "unintended". In that, I have to agree with you.

This beggars the question of exactly what do these vile bastards expect from a world where Western Civilization has been deconstructed. Its nearest equivalent would be Islam's global caliphate, where the planet is dragged back into the Iron Age, while losing half of its population in the process.

Zenster said...

Anonymous (January 23, 2012 9:12 PM): Without authority, responsibility makes one a whipping boy.

A good point and one that merits further examination. How, exactly, was it that Whites were willing to relinquish authority but still accept responsibility?

"Power sharing" does not fully explain this, nor does pursuit of a "colorblind" society. It almost boils down to an unwillingness regarding recognition of one's own attainments and, thereby, abdication of the authority that such achievements confer.

10mm AUTO said...

Zenster, this may be your best work yet. The observations on "No Go Zones" is right on as well as the colonization aspect. I am constantly surprised when White commentators hear blacks say, "We want to kill you" or "we are going to take you over" and they ignore it (See below), yet a White says, "We need a homeland" and he is vilified.

See: http://youtu.be/ISN1RCxko2Q

or

http://youtu.be/FZCDYAy1rJM

Kylie said...

Superb, Zenster. You have exceeded the (very high) standards I had for your writing.

Thank you!

And, as always, thanks to Paul for being truly inspirational.

Zenster said...

Californian: "Racism" is defined by the other side as anything that would defend Western or white peoples.

Which is exactly why Whites have to overcome any and all fear of being called "racist". Removing that one stigma would disempower a lot of anti-White elements.

The other side correctly sees this as a race-based struggle, with race defined in its broader sense. White people (or at least their leaders) refuse to understand this reality. Or maybe they understand it but support it for their own reasons.

It's the "support it for their own reasons" part that makes me most suspicious. In their usual mode of Magical Thinking™, Liberals seem to believe that once their pet Blacks and Muslims have destroyed Western civilization, these anti-gun pansies somehow will blithely prance into the power vacuum and snatch the reins from whatever war lords have been doing all the heavy lifting for them.

Nothing could be farther from the truth. As is noted in an interview with ex-KGB agent, Yuri Bezmenov, (time point ― 02:46) true believers will go to the wall first.

The same goes for Liberal enablers. Deconstructing Blacks and Muslims will go after them first. Blacks, because most of these anti-gun Liberals will be unarmed and relatively well-off targets. Muslims, because Liberals are notorious supporters of Woman's and gay rights.

Still, due to their delusional mindset, Liberals continue to envision themselves as ultimately benefiting from a dismantling of the one of the few political environments on earth that even tolerates their duplicitous existence. This is Liberal cognitive dissonance writ large.

Perhaps, the final point being that, not even America's robust Constitutional Republic can withstand the presence of seditious Liberals.

Note: Full length video (01:23:00) >here<
Well worth watching if you haven't already.

Zenster said...

Lily White: Excellent piece, Zenster. You nailed it, as usual.

Thank you, m'lady.

"White Man's Burden" appears to be a nonstop browbeating for daring to exist.

If not for also being a standing rebuke to all other races, a few of which had thousands of years worth of a head start on us.

I'm still waiting for some other race to land an astronaut on the moon.

Zenster said...

Anonymous (January 23, 2012 9:56 PM): I am really interested, and wish you would write more, about where this liberal theology started, what they hope to achieve and why even our government enforces positive discrimination.

Thank you for the suggestion. I fear such an essay might go out to an equal, if not greater, number of parts as this one is currently doing.
(I'm on Part VII right now.)

Was this just an effort to gain more power? If it is, they themselves being white will not keep that power for long.

Yours is a really good point and one that highlights how the "colorblind" Liberal mentality refuses to recognize the way that its very existence relies upon the tolerant White culture that they are so busy deconstructing.

Please refer to my comment at 11:23 AM for more input.

Zenster said...

Anonymous (January 23, 2012 10:00 PM): National Endowments for the Arts = Piss Christ and other anti Christian 'treasures'....

I refer you to "The Communist Takeover Of
America - 45 Declared Goals
":

22. Continue discrediting American culture by degrading all forms of artistic expression. An American Communist cell was told to "eliminate all good sculpture from parks and buildings, substitute shapeless, awkward and meaningless forms."

23. Control art critics and directors of art museums. "Our plan is to promote ugliness, repulsive, meaningless art."

24. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them "censorship" and a violation of free speech and free press.
[emphasis added]

Zenster said...

Anonymous (January 23, 2012 10:04 PM): This is one of yr best and should be required reading for all 4th graders!

Thank you for the high praise. I'm glad you're enjoying Part II so much.

Leftists also bemoan 'enclaves' [that they may live in]

No "may" about it. Most Liberals actively seek out Whitopias to dwell in, regardless of what they may say to the contrary.

But [they] don't connect immigrants / black crime to the rich seeking refuge … or if they don't I don't hear it on NPR!

Nor will you anytime soon. Drawing such a connection would provide a valid explanation for the White Flight that Liberals are working so hard to outlaw.

Finally, why in hell NPR is still getting taxpayer money, I surely don't know. It's long past tea to shut off government funding of this Liberal sewer pipe.

Anonymous said...

white people have no future

get used to it


Look at Rhodesia for the black future. Or Detroit.

That is what happens when black people run things.

Zenster said...

Anonymous (January 23, 2012 10:10 PM): Beautiful post

Thank you very much.

Anyway, what bother me even more is that non-whites in general don't view our technology, culture etc. as ours, they think it's everybody's technology!

This is a really good point and one that I, as a technologist, should probably take some time to expand upon in a future essay. At some point Whites may need to impose an "innovation tax" for everyone that wants to hop on for a free ride after we've shoveled the technology engine full of coal.

I mean, just go to Japan, they are surrounded by white inventions, culture, clothes, but they think that's Japanese technology etc.

Welcome to one of the byproducts of being, quite possibly, the world's most xenophobic country short of North Korea.

Whatever whites have ever made has been exploited for the benefit of billions of people from other races, they just don't know who they really are lol tell to blacks that their people still live in mud huts even today, they will tell you that you are racist, that is white people's fault, that the egyptians were black

Be patient, pretty soon the residents of Detroit will be erecting mud huts after all the houses collapse from lack of repair.

Zenster said...

Caiden: Most people are pretending there is nothing to worry about. Once they realize not only is there something to worry about, but they're being made unable to defend themselves, even legally, then normal people will riot.

If not "riot", you can be certain that there will be a massive uptick in vigilantism. The seizure of arms from law abiding citizens during hurricane Katrina was a warning shot (so to speak), for White America.

The only conclusion that I can draw from the Katrina gun seizure was that law enforcement knew there were going to be lots of dead looters and home invaders as a result of having an armed populace. Why they thought that was a bad idea is a much bigger question, especially when their own rank and file was participating in the looting.

But, then again, maybe I just answered my own question. (Duh!)

Zenster said...

Anonymous (January 24, 2012 9:20 AM): white cries of “oppression” is a classic example of privileged people defending their privilege by taking on the mantle of victimhood, acting as if resistance to their privilege somehow constitutes misunderstanding, bigotry, and oppression.

Hiding behind the skirts of anonymity is almost a lame as your entire statement. How to prove it? Let's try a little word substitution:

Black cries of “oppression” is a classic example of a privileged minority defending their privilege by taking on the mantle of victimhood, acting as if resistance to their privilege somehow constitutes misunderstanding, bigotry, and oppression.

Boy howdy, didn't that work out just dandy with just a couple of words changed?

Now, ask yourself, which statement is closer to the truth?

Caiden said...

To the anon from January 24, 2012 8:10 AM, then blacks have no future. Blacks are subhumans and are dependant on whites for food, money, housing, and jobs. Look at Africa. Now look at Europe. If whites 'disappeared' every city would fall apart, ie Detroit and HUNDREDS of other examples.

Blacks are not humans, they do not have the mental capacity to run organized systems. The closest would be street gangs, which work through force of arms rather then intelligence.

Blacks have shown, in every country they exist, that they will act like apes. Happy to take or steal whatever they can, or happy to sit in public housing and destroy the building slowly.

Such is life. if whites accept it, fine, civilization will crumble. You can't dress a black as a human and expect him to act human. Blacks will not inherit civilizations, they will infest them like parasites, until they crumble without upkeep.

Zenster said...

Anonymous (January 24, 2012 9:22 AM): I say to the white people, stand up straight, hold your arms out and keep very still so that you don’t frighten those chickens when they come home to roost.

What chickens, all those ones that Blacks are buying with their EBT cards? Caring for and feeding Blacks has gotten American Whites nothing but more misery. Whites have done every penance imaginable in atonement for slavery. But it's just not enough, is it?

I say to you, if Whites hold their "arms out", you'll be fortunate if a slap in the face is all you get. Some of those arms will be street sweepers bought in preparation for people with your exact attitude.

Also, why is it that pills we dish are the same pills we find so very hard to swallow?

You let me know when Blacks finally manage to swallow a few pills like, contraceptives, anti-virals, Antabuse™ and chlorpromazine.

Whites already have been choking on the bitter pills of Affirmative Action, Welfare Queens, Beat Whitey Night, Knockout King and so-called "Hate Crime" laws for some time now.

Californian said...

Still, due to their delusional mindset, Liberals continue to envision themselves as ultimately benefiting from a dismantling of the one of the few political environments on earth that even tolerates their duplicitous existence. This is Liberal cognitive dissonance writ large.

The disturbing thing is that DWLs may not be rational. Many of the ones I know live in a delusional world. Take for example those DWLs who dominate most universities. They are used to seeing third worlders via the people they see on campus: often, those third worlders are the small cognitive elite of their own societies, or are smart enough to tell DWLs what they want to hear. When there is the occasional outburst of anti-liberal behavior, such as with the Muslims who disrupted the speech of an Israeli diplomat on UC Irvine, it will be rationalized away as part of the fight against "racism" or struggle against "oppression."

In the bigger picture, there was a time in which various colonial Western peoples could hold back the third world tide, as with white colonists in French Algeria, or in South Africa. But with the ascension of third world demagogues in these countries (facilitated by DWLs, incidentally), these defenses are long since gone. One result has been the flooding into Europe of large number of Africans.

But DWLs still have little in the way of a clue. I have discussed this issue with representative DWLs, and they assume a form of liberal-machismo, informing me that they are not "afraid" of people whose skin color is darker than their own. Of course, the concept that third world difference are more than skin deep, are the result of differing cultures and genetics, is beyond them.

I suspect there will be a downward cycle of DWL magical thinking. I see this already with Scandinavians I know who ignore the depredations which Muslims are already inflicting on their own countries, which I need not catalog on this website. Rather, they insist, if we could simply overcome "racism," those Muslims would turn into Norwegians or Danes or whatever.

At what point will DWLs wake up? My increasingly pessimistic view is that liberalism is a civilizational-wide Stockholm Syndrome, a pathology which rationalizes away the Decline of the West.

Zenster said...

Sheila: My ultimate point is that we constantly judge someone's degree of assimilation based on superficial concepts such as speech and/or dress.

Genuine assimilation must go well beyond the superficialities that you cite otherwise it is meaningless. Adoption of American Constitutional law and a refusal to import the culture of corruption that accompanies so many modern immigrants would be just a few starting points.

How often does one read, of the latest Muslim jihadi, that he was "just like everyone else" and wore jeans and ate pizza.

Your example only serves to highlight just how facile currently held public standards of "assimilation" are. In fact, Muslims are the absolute worst case imaginable as they purposefully appear to assimilate without ever having the least intention of doing so.

The Islamic practice of taqiyya (religiously sanctioned deceit) and Qur'anic doctrine both militate against the slightest degree of assimilation: (from the link)

[3.118] O you who believe! do not take for intimate friends from among others than your own people; they do not fall short of inflicting loss upon you; they love what distresses you; vehement hatred has already appeared from out of their mouths, and what their breasts conceal is greater still; indeed, We have made the communications clear to you, if you will understand.

The message of Koran 3.118 cannot be clearer. Non-believers are not to be trusted, non-believers have ill-will towards believers, non-believers take pleasure in anything that “distresses” a Muslim. This is the command of the Koran. Is it any wonder then that Islam will not assimilate to the culture and way of life of their host countries?

Assimilation is not on the Islamic agenda, though it is very much on ours. This fundamental conflict of purposes must be understood and accepted as truth. It is in the Koran; for Muslims it is the truth.

[3.28] Let not the believers take the unbelievers for friends rather than believers; and whoever does this, he shall have nothing of (the guardianship of) Allah, but you should guard yourselves against them, guarding carefully; and Allah makes you cautious of (retribution from) Himself; and to Allah is the eventual coming.

The point is made again and again. Muslims are forbidden from taking unbelievers as friends, as doing so puts one outside the Muslim worldview and outside the favor of Allah. Do not take the unbelievers for friends; only guard against them.

If the message is not yet clear, there is more. Islam is particularly unfriendly to Christians and Jews (the people of the book). There must be no friendly interaction between Muslims and all kafirs.

[5.57] O you who believe! do not take for guardians those who take your religion for a mockery and a joke, from among those who were given the Book before you and the unbelievers; and be careful of (your duty to) Allah if you are believers. … this is because they are a people that do not understand.


People should feel free to draw parallels between the exclusionary aspects of Islamic culture and the Black distaste for "acting White".

I think, when discussing "diversity" and "American disintegration," one needs to go back further than the infamous immigration act of 1965. The seeds of our demise were sown long before.

Which, within the limits of this forum, I have sought to do. The importation of Blacks was one of America's most colossal mistakes. I think we can all agree upon that much.

(Hope all my attempted links work; I'm a novice and this is one of my first efforts at using them.)

The second link was broken. Remember, you can always test all of your links during the "PRIVIEW" phase of commentting. I always open them in a new window to make closing them easier.

Zenster said...

10mm AUTO: Zenster, this may be your best work yet.

Thank you. I am confident that you're really going to enjoy future parts of this essay.

As a courtesy, here are active links to the videos you posted. People should take a few short minutes to view them:

Extermination of white people?

Glenn Beck interviews Malik Shabazz of the New Black Panther Party

Zenster said...

Kylie: Superb, Zenster. You have exceeded the (very high) standards I had for your writing.

Wow! That's very kind of you to say. Thank you so much. The best is yet to come.

Anonymous said...

Great article!
In my locality, the public schools are being taken to task for failing state tests but when broken down by race,it is BLACK students who are failing at basic reading and math.Now they are being told to work with these students to ensure they can pass a test for state standards.
They really do drag down the rest of the students,but nobody has the balls to come out and say what is right in front of them.

Anonymous said...

"privileged people defending their privilege..."

Here we go again.

Dear Negro(s),

This is a white majority country. Whites have higher intellect and ability compared to blacks. Our ancestors created the Founding principles of this country for white men, not negros. Of course you do not understand our motives.

We have better future time orientation, are able to form families, alliances, and associations. We are able to make something great out of a pile of rubble. We use our brains to solve problems, and we are the inventors of amazing machines that make your life easier.

We enjoy higher IQ, and thus are able to handle freedom and personal responsibility. We have built wealth for future generations of white people. We have built a strong infrastructure, and we have created just about everything you touch on a daily basis.

All of this translates to "white privilege" in the black man's mind. We must have gotten it fraudulently. We must have stolen it! The black man's voluntary enslavement will never allow him to appreciate such ability. He cannot understand freedom, delayed gratification, or any of the other traits of white people culture which guarantee our success, and the success of our Western European countries.

Whites will ALWAYS have privilege in America. Even if you out-breed us or import the entire third world, we will still be the ones you depend on to run things. You will always hate us because you can never be us.

Anonymous said...

It was a pleasure to read your piece Zenster. Thank you PK. I wish non-whites would stay in their enclaves! As you say, they are colonizing. Formerly mostly white Bayside, NY is now majority Asian. We are strangers in our own hometown. Government at all levels force the underclass non-whites into working class and middle class white neighborhoods, getting subsidized all the way. Destroying towns and lives all over the country. Notice there is very little "diversity" in the well-off neighborhoods. When more judges like Leonard Sand force the wealthy to diversify I'm sure ways will be found to minimize THEIR exposure however. I notice you have a particular animus towards Muslims. I have no problem with that, I agree with you. You probably know that there is a large Hasidic enclave in Monsey, NY. It is basically a no-go zone. While you will not be beaten up, you may have rocks thrown at your car! And like most ethnic enclaves, it is a hotbed of welfare, medicaid, EBT, SSI, subsidies, grants and other entitlements. Lots of pressure on politicians for even more funds for schools, healthcare, transportation, etc. Like other ethnic enclaves, LOTS of fraud and corruption. On the way out of office, Clinton pardoned a group of crooks from Monsey who embezzled millions of federal taxpayer dollars.

Ivan Shatov said...

The radicalized revolutionary left has destroyed Christian man's ties with his past, his people, his religion, his God, his truths, his freedom of association, his family, his race, his ethnicity, his inequalities, his hierarchies, his authority, his order, his rituals, his language, his beliefs, his beauties, his goods and all that he holds essential and dear. We are told that man needs but faith alone - rubbish! Man needs a living breathing God as embodied in his people (the Europeans) and their traditions and rituals.

The abstract man of the utopian left and the modern Christian is a deracinated monster who has long since ceased to reflect God's grace and glory. The modern churches have become cesspools of Satanic subversion. The fifth commandment instructs us to honor they father and mother and by extension our ancestors, people and traditions.

Heresy begins with resentment that we are not God and our temptation to usurp His rightful place. God created nations, peoples and individuals that are not equal. Can you imagine the monotony and oppressiveness were it otherwise? Who are we to impose our ideas of equality on God's undeniably unequal creation? And in denying the truth of his creation and hubristically attempting to change that which is, we have engaged in the worst sort of Christian apostasy.

The faith that built the West is dying and that is precisely because Western man has been deprived of the wellspring of his wellbeing. He has been stripped of the civilization of his ancestors and told that this is progress.

Deracinated Western man, his civilizataion and the civilization He built are dying.

Ivan Shatov said...

Caiden said:

"Blacks are not humans, they do not have the mental capacity to run organized systems."

Of course blacks are humans. They are simply unequal. They are less intelligent, less reliable, less industrious, less capable, less inventive, more criminally inclined and more impulsive. But, human nonetheless.

Hatred of the blacks is surely counterproductive and unbecoming. While I believe in absolute separation, Jim Crow and apartheid I do not deny the humanity of the blacks. They simply need to be separated from Europeans for their own good as well as ours. The deceit of equality has demonstrably hurt both blacks and whites. The bigotry of the universalist utopians creates deceits and lies which degrade us all by being forced to participate in the lies.

Anonymous said...

"tax consumers" - I prefer IL's Pate Phillips terminology: TAX EATERS.

"TNB (Typical Nigger Behavior)" - Cops actually use TNA (TN ACTIVITY) over the air, believe it or not.

Section 8 - I actually heard two Black women talking about a woman who went to Nebraska into order to get Section 8!

Anonymous said...

Jim Schutze, a total DWL libtard "journalist", who fled his hometown of Detroit years ago to live in Dallas and foist his white libtard propaganda off on the pages of the "Dallas Observer", seems to be waking up (somewhat) to the horrible reality of "Black Run America".

http://blogs.dallasobserver.com/unfairpark/2012/01/jenkins_hits_the_price_wall_in.php

Clay Jenkins Hits the Wall in the Appointment of New Black Panther Party Founder

By Jim Schutze Tue., Jan. 24 2012

SHZ_GetOffMyLawn_TitleImageV2.jpg
​It looks like Dallas County Judge Clay Jenkins, long a puppet of Dallas County Commissioner John Wiley Price, finally has hit the Price wall. Jenkins has stopped action on the appointment of Price protégé Aaron McCarthy, aka Aaron Michaels, to the county's "homeland security advisory committee," whatever the hell that's supposed to be.

There is a Price wall. The most prominent marker for that wall is his sympathy for, consorting with and relentless promotion over decades of McCarthy, who is a founder of one of the nation's most virulently anti-Semitic hate groups, the so-called "New Black Panthers."

In 1990 Michaels, then a producer of a radio show for Price, helped found the group to take on school board issues in the city. The group was sued successfully by the original Black Panthers, who denounced it as a racist hate group and insisted it stop using the name, but a ruling in the plaintiffs' behalf has never been enforced.
...

I hate reprinting some of what follows below. The words themselves are vile. But we need to know exactly what this group, long supported by Price, really believes and preaches. These quotes are taken from the website of the Southern Poverty Law Center in Montgomery, Alabama, the nation's most respected and quoted watchdog of hate groups.

NBPP leader Khalid Abdul Muhammad, speaking at a protest in Baltimore, Maryland, February 19, 1994: "Our lessons talk about the bloodsuckers of the poor. ... It's that old no-good Jew, that old imposter Jew, that old hooked-nose, bagel-eating, lox-eating, Johnny-come-lately, perpetrating-a-fraud, just-crawled-out-of-the-caves-and-hills-of-Europe, so-called damn Jew ... and I feel everything I'm saying up here is kosher."

Malik Zulu Shabazz, the party's national chairman, protesting at B'nai B'rith International headquarters in Washington, D.C., April 20, 2002: "Kill every goddamn Zionist in Israel! Goddamn little babies, goddamn old ladies! Blow up Zionist supermarkets!"

King Samir Shabazz, head of the party's Philadelphia chapter, in a National Geographic documentary, January 2009: "I hate white people. All of them. Every last iota of a cracker, I hate it. We didn't come out here to play today. There's too much serious business going on in the black community to be out here sliding through South Street with white, dirty, cracker whore bitches on our arms, and we call ourselves black men. ... What the hell is wrong with you black man? You at a doomsday with a white girl on your damn arm. We keep begging white people for freedom! No wonder we not free! Your enemy cannot make you free, fool! You want freedom? You going to have to kill some crackers! You going to have to kill some of their babies!"
...
more article at link above
...

Charles Martel said...

Another great article. Thank you Zenster for all your contributions to SBPDL.

Again for those of us who have been wide eyed and seeing the truth for years these facts, while important and interesting, the real question still looms out of reach namely How do we stop, roll back and then defeat this ongoing and ever growing problem? Will we let the burden of this war fall on our childrens backs?

Ben N Indiana said...

Gasp!

Black unemployment in Milwaukee is over 50%!!!!

(Black males aged 18-64)

Link

That's higher than Haiti!

Link

Ivan Shatov said...

Charles Martel said:

"The real question still looms out of reach namely How do we stop, roll back and then defeat this ongoing and ever growing problem? Will we let the burden of this war fall on our childrens backs?"

Charles, unfortunately, given the fixed variables, namely, democratic (mob) rule, uncontrolled immigration, destruction of the founding stock of this country, and toxic cultural, media and university environments there is nothing that can be done save what we are doing here.

We can patiently spread the word and support the tiny remnant of those of us with old European sensibilities. At some point, after the collapse, the rebuilding will begin. But even then, the toxic ideologies which have taken root in the hearts and minds of Westerners will make rebuilding that much more difficult.

Raise your children well, be true to your family, your God and your people. And be prepared. Only those solutions which evolve organically from our past traditions and experiences will ultimately extract us from this vale of tears.

Zenster said...

Anonymous (January 24, 2012 5:12 PM): "tax consumers" - I prefer IL's Pate Phillips terminology: TAX EATERS.

I considered using that term. Unfortunately, the inverse of "tax eater" would be ― to put it politely ― a tax "excreter". That's not a very complimentary term for the average taxpayer.

"TNB (Typical Nigger Behavior)" - Cops actually use TNA (TN ACTIVITY) over the air, believe it or not.

That's hard to believe. In many cities, any cops using such a term could lose their jobs or at least qualify for weeks of mind-numbing "sensitivity training". Not that the term is inaccurate or anything.

I suppose, when asked, the explanation given must be "Typical Negro Activity".

Anonymous said...

Zenster why are you obsessed with Islam ? Paul are you going to let this site turn into Jihad Watch lite ?

Discard said...

Zenster: The advantage of using initials to say the unspeakable is that the burden of proof is on your accusers. Initials could stand for any number of things. In Viet Nam, for example, FTA (Fuck The Army) written on a helmet was said to stand for Fun,Travel, and Adventure. The worst that could happen to you was to be told to get a new camo cover for your helmet. And are politicians really going to call a press conference and tell the world that the cops have been dissin' the brothers, and then see that expression spread further among the general public?

BTW, do you recall when Jesse Jackson was an announced candidate for the Democrat presidential nomination? The Secret Service gave him the code name "Pontiac". It stood for "Poor Old Negro Thinks It's A Cadillac". They changed the name, but nobody was fired.

The PTB will always try to suppress dissent, but it always oozes out somehow.

Zenster said...

Ben N Indiana: Gasp!

Black unemployment in Milwaukee is over 50%!!!! (Black males aged 18-64) That's higher than Haiti!


Much higher, actually.

Haiti is 90% Black. Milwaukee is only 24.6% Black.

How to establish the relative difference in unemployment ― with respect to ratiometric calculation for race ― when a population that is more than three times as dense (e.g., Haiti), experiences unemployment on a level of an American city whose population is only 24.6% Black in total?

Whatever the final number is, it can only be appalling.

Zenster said...

Charles Martel: Another great article. Thank you Zenster for all your contributions to SBPDL.

You are quite welcome. I'm glad that you're enjoying them.

How do we stop, roll back and then defeat this ongoing and ever growing problem?

For the nonce, we will have to do it the hard way, one mind at a time. Fortunately, recent attempts at restricting the internet have hit a brick wall. That is a huge relief for all of us in the blogsphere.

The net and our own "evangelizing" will have to substitute for mass media until Race Realism finds a true mainstream voice.

Will we let the burden of this war fall on our children's backs?

That is something we must not do. Massive transgenerational theft through corporate and government cronyism has already saddled future generations with unprecedented debt. It is our obligation to ignite a firestorm of protest now if we are to have any hope that our descendants will not damn us to hell for what happened on our watch.

justinfication said...

I agree on your thoughts with the movie. Here are more of my thoughts on Red Tails.

http://threaders.wordpress.com/2012/01/24/shit-black-people-said-after-seeing-red-tails/

Anonymous said...

http://threaders.wordpress.com/2012/01/24/shit-black-people-said-after-seeing-red-tails/

Zenster said...

Anonymous: Zenster why are you obsessed with Islam ?

If you aren't concerned about Islam, then you aren't paying attention. Islamic jihad represents one of the single biggest short-term threats to Western civilization on a par with Soviet Communism and Nazism combined.

Paul possesses sufficient sagacity whereby he understands this and is most likely already well aware of the way that jihadists are routinely converting Black prison inmates to Islam despite how Arab Muslims view Blacks as less than animals.

What's more, the parallels between Islamic and Black "culture" are so numerous to the point where alleviating both of these threats will see counteractive policies that have much in common.

The following list of features held in common is the nucleus for an upcoming essay. Make of it what you will:

1. Propensity for genocide
2. Inability to withstand humiliation
3. Professional victims
4. Massive sense of entitlement
5. Ready resort to physical aggression
6. Instigate random violence
7. Vicious cruelty
8. Use rape as a weapon
9. Predisposition to lie, taqiyya vs “no snitch”
10. Abuse of women ― Misogyny
11. Create "no-go zone" ghetto enclaves
12. Cause poverty
13. Strong drivers of demographic displacement
14. Low average IQ
15. Spread HIV/AIDS
16. Destructive to infrastructure
17. Use of punitive amputation
18. Promote gang activity
19. Routine criminal behavior
20. Polygamy
21. Rampant child abuse
22. Lack of inventiveness
23. Deeply racist
24. Liberal “Protected Species”
25. Practice modern slavery
26. Widespread illiteracy
27. Endemic corruption
28. Military incompetence
29. Technologically illiterate
30. Drivers of chaos and disorder
31. Elevated rate of genetic disorders
32. Refusal to accept personal responsibility
33. Intensely parasitic
34. Infantilized by Liberals
35. Huge consumers of social benefits
36. Enemies of Western civilization
37. High incarceration rates
38. Employ “lawfare” type legal actions
39. Hardcore drug distribution
40. Pimping of minors
41. Commit hate crimes
42. Require increased legal enforcement
43. National security threat
44. Downgrade US military performance
45. Tyrannical governance

Is there anything unclear about this?

Paul are you going to let this site turn into Jihad Watch lite ?

Again, it requires a shoe-sized IQ not to see the important similarities between these two threats to White culture.

Zenster said...

Discard: And are politicians really going to call a press conference and tell the world that the cops have been dissin' the brothers, and then see that expression spread further among the general public?

Which all goes to show that there's no such thing as "bad" publicity.

Anonymous said...

I have to agree with Anonymous at 0748. Zenster does some great work, but for no reason at all jumps off on the Muslim immigration and nuke Iran bandwagon. This site has found a very important and underserved niche, don't let it become a Jihad Watch or pro-Israel site, please!

Zenster said...

Anonymous (January 25, 2012 8:57 AM): Zenster does some great work, but for no reason at all jumps off on the Muslim immigration and nuke Iran bandwagon.

Please find one single instance where I have ever proposed that America should "nuke Iran".

If you cannot, then post a public retraction or STFU!

I advocate using conventional weapons to destroy Iran's nuclear bomb-making capacity and only that.

This site has found a very important and underserved niche, don't let it become a Jihad Watch or pro-Israel site, please!

If you do not see the manifold similarities between the threats posed by Muslims and Blacks, you must be blind! Much to his credit, Paul does.

Discard said...

As a refugee from Los Angeles, I'd have to say that Hispanic immigration poses a much more immediate threat than the Sand People.

Anonymous said...

I agree with anon 8:57 . It would be a shame if this site went the same way as Conservatism. Paul please don't let this place get hijacked. I know a lot of people who are turned off by the anti-jihadists.

Anonymous said...

Zenster

Your list of parallels between Islam and Blacks is ridiculous. I'm not sure if you're serious. The idea alone of trying to compare a race of 40 million (African Americans)to a religion which encompasses all sorts of different races,ethnicities, and cultures from north Africa, to eastern Europe, the Levant, central Asia, and south east Asia is laughable. The biggest factor responsible for pathological behavior in humans is biological. It's all about genetics. As far as I can tell Islam doesn't alter your DNA. Oh and just as an aside, "nazi" Germany fought to protect Western Civilization from Communism.

Zenster said...

Anonymous (January 25, 2012 3:11 PM): Your list of parallels between Islam and Blacks is ridiculous.

Nice drive-by there. Everybody is supposed to believe that my list is "ridiculous" just because you say so without providing any fact-based counter argument. Good stuff there, bunky.

I'm not sure if you're serious.

I'm as "serious" as a heart attack.

The idea alone of trying to compare a race of 40 million (African Americans)to a religion which encompasses all sorts of different races,ethnicities, and cultures from north Africa, to eastern Europe, the Levant, central Asia, and south east Asia is laughable.

Again, it's "laughable" just because you say so. What a scream.

The biggest factor responsible for pathological behavior in humans is biological. It's all about genetics. As far as I can tell Islam doesn't alter your DNA.

Then you can't tell diddly effing squat. Through consanguineous marriage, Islam has been damaging its genetic pool for over 1,000 years.

Oh and just as an aside, "nazi" Germany fought to protect Western Civilization from Communism.

So effing what? That in no way alters how so many Muslims hold Hitler in high esteem to the point where his Mein Kampf is a best seller in the Muslim Middle East.

Hitler's hate-filled and virulently anti-Jewish autobiography has been available in Arabic since 1963 and remains a perennial best seller in several Islamic countries.



When
Mein Kampf was republished by Yasser Arafat's Palestinian National Authority in 2001, shortly after the September 11 terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon, it achieved best seller status throughout the Arab world.

Nor does it change how modern Islamic terrorism was largely born and bred in Soviet Russia. Read "The (Russian) Roots of Islamic Terrorism" if you want to purchase a fricking clue:

Modern terrorism was born within a year, 1967-1968. International socialists (communists) started the fashion all over the world simultaneously, which should make us suspicious about the common roots. National socialists followed suit, turning Marxists of Muslim origin into Islamists of Marxist origin.

If you do not understand the convergence of Nazism and Communism that Islam represents, then there is little that can be done for you. That Hitler fought Stalin doesn't even enter into it.

You deride my list yet I doubt you have any decent explanation for why jihadists are so successful at recruiting Black prison inmates here in America. Care to explain away that fact without noting any parallels between their "cultures"?

Anonymous said...

I quote you..the answer to yr question is...To Ruin America!
Read John Birch material!!!

your:
'iven that America’s existing Black population poses so many detrimental factors, it defies all logic and reason that this nation is currently importing hordes of African nationals. Such illogicality is further compounded by the fact that many of these African immigrants are totally illiterate, both cognitively and technologically. None of which even addresses how they are often arriving from Islamic cultures which are brazenly antagonistic to all aspects of Western civilization. Again, much of this is a direct result of Liberal Democrats cultivating tax consuming Mendicant Voter Plantations at the direct expense of White Middle Class tax producers.'

Anonymous said...

Excellent;

I just may copy-paste the content of this page and distribute it to all the folks I know with blinders on their eyes.

I love the fact of "colonization" vs.
"integration". If nothing else changes, the use of these two concepts can certainly tilt the balance in favor of "all of the low I.Q" readers out here in "Drifter Land".

Well said and properly presented---KUDOS!

Zenster said...

Anonymous (January 27, 2012 9:51 PM): Excellent;

Thank you.

I just may copy-paste the content of this page and distribute it to all the folks I know with blinders on their eyes.

Please do. All I request is proper attribution, preferably with a link back to here.

I love the fact of "colonization" vs. "integration".

Thank you again. Liberal America's nearly unrestricted importation of illiterate, primitive, barbaric, cretinous Third World savages is earning them an increasingly merited blanket death sentence.

Well said and properly presented---KUDOS!

I genuinely appreciate your commendation. If you are a newcomer to SBPDL, please consider posting more often.

Anonymous said...

HOW MANY OF US CAN REMEMBER 40 YEARS AGO..1970-74????
USA TODAY IS WAY DIFFERENT, WAY WORSE.

In 1960 US population was like 150m-180m, 91% white.

Siegfried said...

Zenster,

allow me to weigh in on the Islam question. What you have written here shows that you are one who sees that the source of the problems in the USA today is the Godless Leviathan that passed all this legislation and destruction back in the 60s based on fundamentally flawed ideology. attacking Christianity in schools, white ethnic neighborhoods, male leadership of families: these are part and parcel of the same, evil organization. It needs to GO AWAY, and we might be able to recover.

Bizarrely, you see this organization that has foisted nothing but evil on the White,population as capable of effecting GOOD when it works overseas. This calls into question your whole argument, and given the cogency of the Rest of your argument, the contrast is jarring.

Iran is not the problem. they are below replacement in population growth now, just like us. The problem is in DC: keep the focus where your expertise is so amply demonstrated.

Zenster said...

Siegfried: Bizarrely, you see this organization that has foisted nothing but evil on the White, population as capable of effecting GOOD when it works overseas.

Please explain, as I am mystified by your assessment.

A better explanation would be most welcome and if any error upon my part is responsible, I'll happily pitch it on the trash heap.

Anonymous said...

this website is obviously for those with IQ's that are sub 80. Bush created the Great Recession and before 2007 wages were growing for the middle class at rates equal to those in the Great Depression. with no savings for many of course food stamp use, etc. is going to increase. the US spends the least on social protections as a percentage of GDP out of all but 2 country's in the OECD. you don't know jack squat about economics