Friday, June 22, 2012

Smoke and Mirrors: Conservatism Inc., The Unfair Campaign, and Charlton Heston

It wouldn't be hard. It wouldn't take much.

Unfair to be born right? Conservatism Inc. sees profit in exploiting this...
Just a push; a hero to rally around.

You might recall that on January 31, 2012, we published a story called UnFair Campaign: What do men do against such reckless hate? Ride out and meet them. Yesterday, Matt Drudge of the Drudgereport.com resurrected this story and made it - instantaneously - the most talked about story in all of conservative media. The Blaze, Daily Caller, Fox News, HotAir, WND, Newsmax, Mark Levine, Neal Boortz, Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity... all had stories detailing the tale of whiteness as the ultimate form of evil, as pronounced by the intellectual giants at the University of Minnesota-Duluth.

A nearly six months old story became the most talked about story in all of America yesterday, with even Bill O'Reilly of The O'Reilly Factor leading off with the story on tonight's show.

Here's The Blaze on the story (‘NOT FAIR TO BE WHITE’: SEE THE UNBELIEVABLE NEW CAMPAIGN SPONSORED BY THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA-DULUTH):
Here’s a pop quiz: What do we usually call unsubstantiated assumptions about someone’s class, or position in life, based upon the color of their skin? 
That’s right, racism. And that appears to be what Campus Reform has uncovered at the University of Minnesota-Duluth, which is sponsoring an ad campaign whose core message is very difficult to distinguish from undiluted racism. Watch the ad below if you don’t believe us, and if that doesn’t convince you, keep reading: 
Here is what Campus Reform has to say about the ad campaign: 
The University of Minnesota – Duluth (UMD) is now sponsoring an ad-campaign designed to achieve “racial justice” by raising awareness of “white privilege.” 
The project disseminates its message, that “society was setup for us [whites]“ and as such is ”unfair,” through an aggressive campaign of online videos, billboards, and lectures. The ads feature a number of Caucasians confessing their guilt for the supposed “privilege” that comes along with their fair features.[...] 
“You give me better jobs, better pay, better treatment, and a better chance – all because of the color of my skin,” reads one poster that features a close shot of a Caucasian male. 
The Un-Fair campaign also held a series of lectures and events on campus last semester. 
One included a presentation by Tim Wise, author of Dear White America. In his book, Wise confesses a “longstanding fantasy” where he turns to a man with a “God Bless the USA” button and asks him, “why can’t you just get over it?”
The story at The Blaze has more than 960 comments and has been "liked" on Facebook more than 6,500 times. Yet it ends with this statement:
A few weeks ago, the Blaze reported on the disgustingly racist attitudes of a resident of South Buffalo, who argued in full view of a camera that “blacks ruin neighborhoods.” This absurd stereotype was rightfully condemned. Yet now the University of Minnesota Duluth is lending institutional support to a campaign whose message is essentially “whites ruined the world and are trying to keep it ruined so that they can profit.” Granted, this isn’t particularly surprising, coming from a university whose very administrators consider the Constitution to be a symbol of “white privilege,” but it is still wrong. 
Clearly, the Un-Fair campaign is aptly named.
The white guy in Buffalo who dared speak his mind using facts and logic that are uninvited to polite, tolerable debate on racial matters in Black-Run America (BRA) - basically, never dare point out that Black dysfunction arises from Black people's accumulated decisions - is a hero; not the one we need right now, nor deserve, but a hero nonetheless.

To be thrown under the bus by a Web site that has spent the past few years building up readership by highlighting Black dysfunction and Black Pack Attacks (Mahogany Mobs) on whites should give you pause before jumping aboard the Glenn Beck Train.

It's a locomotive straight into I Had A Dream (I HAD) land. What America - white America - needs right now are people who have navigated away from I HAD land; those who have seen what "equality" and "freedom" bring about, and those who understand the rocky terrain and topography of BRA are unwelcoming to white people.

Yes -- white people.

White America owes nothing to Black America; once people understand this, the immigration problem and the "Muslim" problem can be dealt with overnight -- but until white people in America understand that they are not to blame for the plight (and blight) of Black Americans, well, you might as well look to Detroit in 2012 as the future of all of the nation.

One of those such men was Charlton Heston. His 1999 "Cultural War" speech to Harvard Law School shames anything Patrick Buchanan has ever publicly stated, and is the stuff of legend. In this address, he points out that he was once marched with Martin Luther King for equality, but seems to understand that this laid the groundwork for something far more sinister (what we have termed BRA):
Dedicating the memorial at a Gettysburg, Abraham Lincoln said of America, "We are now engaged in a great Civil War, testing whether this nation or any nation so conceived and so dedicated can long endure." 
Those words are true again. I believe that we are again engaged in a great civil war, a cultural war that's about to hijack your birthright to think and say what resides in your heart. I fear you no longer trust the pulsing lifeblood of liberty inside you...the stuff that made this country rise from wilderness into the miracle that it is. 
Let me back up. About a year ago I became president of the National Rifle Association, which protects the right to keep and bear arms. I ran for office, I was elected, and now I serve...I serve as a moving target for the media who've called me everything from "ridiculous" and "duped" to a "brain-injured senile, crazy old man." I know...I'm pretty old...but I sure Lord ain't senile. 
As I have stood in the crosshairs of those who target Second Amendment freedoms, I've realized that firearms are not the only issue. No, it's much, much bigger than that.
I've come to understand that a cultural war is raging across our land, in which, with Orwellian fervor, certain acceptable thoughts and speech are mandated. 
For example, I marched for civil rights with Dr. King in 1963 - long before Hollywood found it fashionable. But when I told an audience last year that white pride is just as valid as black pride or red pride or anyone else's pride, they called me a racist. 
I've worked with brilliantly talented homosexuals all my life. But when I told an audience that gay rights should extend no further than your rights or my rights, I was called a homophobe. 
I served in World War II against the Axis powers. But during a speech, when I drew an analogy between singling out innocent Jews and singling out innocent gun owners, I was called an anti-Semite. 
Everyone I know knows I would never raise a closed fist against my country. But when I asked an audience to oppose this cultural persecution, I was compared to Timothy McVeigh. 
From Time magazine to friends and colleagues, they're essentially saying, "Chuck, how dare you speak your mind. You are using language not authorized for public consumption!" 
But I am not afraid. If Americans believed in political correctness, we'd still be King George's boys - subjects bound to the British crown.
It's hard to imagine anyone saying something like this today, and being allowed to ever grace the public stage again (perhaps I'm being to hard on Buchanan; after all, MSNBC cut off his access to the picnic table of tolerated punditry). Remember the end of Bowling for Columbine, where the turgid Michael Moore tries to ensnare Heston in public display of racism:

In the climactic final scene of Michael Moore's Oscar-winning documentary Bowling for Columbine, the highest grossing documentary before Moore's own Fahrenheit 9/11, the rotund one stalks Charlton Heston, the elderly president of the National Rifle Association, to his lair, and asks him:
Moore: But you don't have any opinion as to why we're the unique country, the only country that does this? That kills each other at this level with guns.
 
 Heston: Well, we have, probably a more mixed ethnicity, than other countries, some other countries.
Moore pounces on Heston's shocking faux pas:
Moore: ...So you think it's an ethnic thing?
Sensing his gaffe, Heston paddles desperately upstream:

Heston: Well, I don't think it's—I wouldn't go as far as to say that. We had enough problems with civil rights in the beginning.

A Public Display of Racism is the most punishable offense against BRA one can perform (just look at how Glenn Beck's The Blaze castigates the white guy from Buffalo who shamed all of modern conservatism with his accurate description of what Black people do to a neighborhood and a community).

What should be most frightening to Conservatism Inc. (the term used to describe the incestuous nexus of Beltway Non-Profits/I HAD Pundits/Religious-End-of-Time Zealots, etc.) is the realization that beneath the veneer of the Republican Party beats a heart of something frightening.

Just read the comments of the big right-of-center Web sites: look at Daily Caller's comments; look at The Blaze; look at any of the threads that appear at the affiliate of NBC/CBS/ABC/Fox in a city where another episode of Black people engaging in stereotypically Black behavior...

Lurking behind the heart of Conservatism Inc., is the heart of the America Charlton Heston spoke of in his "Cultural War" speech -- the heart of the America that is so far losing the war.

In one moment, this cultural war could end. Few people dare say that the "cultural war" is really a racial war, an attempt to permanently subjugate white people into a form of financial servitude (you can exist as long as you keep paying taxes to promote the proliferation of non-whites, who will day vote for more and more goodies that you will pay for).

That's the fragility of this whole system.

White America owes Black America nothing. Once you understand this, any attempt at having you live in a world where groveling at the table of tolerance for scraps will be futile.

America is almost ready for the Fair Campaign. Are you?





168 comments:

Jay Santos said...

I've got two comments about this absurdity.

The University of Minnesota campaign is offensive in the extreme. Something is deeply wrong with the people involved with it.

Glen Beck and his Blaze operation are Delusional White Conservatives. Beck is a fraud. A for-profit MLK worshiper of the worst sort.

Mutant Swarm said...

The current Army/USMC psyops manual is available here in PDF form. Download it, study it, and use it to fight the cultural war.

A shorter version is available here as a web page. Download it or save it as a complete web page. This one, especially, will allow you to identify enemy propaganda techniques.

It's time we picked up our enemies' weapons and turned them against them.

Big Bear said...

That's NOT FAIR!!

The credo of the crybabies who will always be second-best, who will always be losers, no matter how much they try to legislate things in their favor.

Natural selection will win out.

Mutant Swarm said...

Let's start with the often-told lie that there are no black serial killers, only whites.

Point them to Coral Eugene Watts.

"...Watts, who was African American, almost always killed young white women.[4] Watts killed females between the ages of 14 and 44 using methods such as strangulation, stabbing, bludgeoning, and drowning. Watts had murdered dozens of women between 1974 and 1982, and despite the many women he murdered, Watts was not discovered as a serial killer for almost eight years..."

Another race "warrior" who targeted our women. Again, note how the weaker people are chosen.

WTF said...

Would some one please shoot Moore's fatasss out of a Cannon. Does anyone realize that most African Nations have firearms as well and actively participate in Genocide. I just see 12% committing some 50% of the crime. What happens when that 12% either leaves or gets its shit together. HERP A DERP I R GENIUS

Nikcrit said...

"A nearly six months old story became the most talked about story in all of America yesterday, with even Bill O'Reilly of The O'Reilly Factor leading off with the story on tonight's show."

Well, put it this way: That claim is about as ridiculous as was the story in question involving U-of-Minn.-Duluth.

Anonymous said...

How's that white privilege thing been workin' out for y'all?

Anonymous said...

"Here’s a pop quiz: What do we usually call unsubstantiated assumptions about someone’s class, or position in life, based upon the color of their skin?"

"That’s right, racism."

Wrong answer. Unsubstantiated assumptions about ANYTHING is what is known as prejudice--or pre-judging.

The only precise definition for racism I've ever seen was one I learned in the Navy in the early eighties. The Navy defined racism as advocating denial or abridgment of rights based upon race.

Of course, the post-Marxist left doesn't want to define the word, as it would then lose its effectiveness as a voodoo-type curse.

Keep up the good work, Paul!

Dunnyveg

Anonymous said...

Beck is nothing more than a money making huckster who won't transgress PC or BRA. He's putting on another of his meaningless rally circuses in Dallas next month called "Restore Love". It'll be as stupid as the "Restore Honor" thing he did last August. How can anyone take this buffoon seriously?

rex freeway said...

AHHH Mikey Moore. What a complete liberal douche nozzle. I wonder if he sleeps well at night knowing what a POS he is?

rex freeway said...

I owe my family their freedom. Freedom from paying for the short comings of a race that cannot compete on a level field. We owe them nothing.NOTHING!

Lily White said...

How about this? "It's hard to see racism when you're dead at the hands of a gang of black punks."

http://www.starnewsonline.com/article/20120621/ARTICLES/120629929/1177?Title=Five-facing-charges-for-murder-of-delivery-driver

Jay Santos said...

Here's a heart warming story of a huge negro who beat a 4'11" woman into a coma over a parking space dispute

Read it here

Constructive Feedback said...

Dear "Black People Watching" friends:

If you don't mind, I, a humble, non-threatening Black guy - who has supervised White people before and never needed Affirmative Action, having graduated in the "National Honor Society" in a 50/50 white/black school - have a question for you.

This "Disingenuous White Liberals" - "DWL" (I thought it was "Delusional White Liberals) label that you use.

(As if I need to guess, but) I am trying to figure out which of these two attributes are more disturbing to your soul:

* Liberalism - as suffered from White people

* Blackness - regardless of the ideology?

While Oakland had been a "Black Liberal" city with its share of crime and desolation - its Bay neighbor San Francisco indeed had more "monied interests" dominating its landscape and culture.

However SFO is overrun with White liberals (increasingly racially diverse liberals) yet I would assume that you see it as an affront to all that you support with regards to traditional Eurocentric Social norms and standards, which they have tossed into the cold, salty waters of the Bay and allowed to drown.

You call them "disingenuous" - which I take as an apparent reference to their views on other RACES.

While I thank you for your quick response to my request about these "White Skinned Racial Trust Fund Babies" I don't believe that you sufficiently kept your focus on THEM in your analysis.

I wasn't asking you about your opinion on how these "WSRTFBs" were "disingenuous" with their views toward "Black puppies" who they take pride in feeding.

I am asking you about YOUR "Inter-White" relationship with them based upon their entire essence. Surely both you and they are more than their views on BLACK FOLKS.

It seems that they HATE YOUR GUTS.

Rachel Maddow and the people from the Nation are only teaming with "The Negroes" to stack the deck numerically in their favor against YOU.

I can only presupposed that your argument is that they know the ultimate consequences of keeping company with "Black Snakes" that are later going to bite them.

I am trying to understand the long running gun battle between "The White Progressive Cheshire Fox" and the "White Conservative Wolf".

I have already predicted that indeed after they truly do lose their "White Privilege" due to the numbers game and the attack that the Progressive Fundamentalist Multi-Special Interest Machine goes on an all out war on White (Classical) European Cultural Mores and Norms that their THEORIES going in to this phase will not live up to the actual and INDEED they will eventually re-encamp with you good "Conservative White Folks" as you continue your ideological shoot out on your own.

Thus this brings my point.
YOU STILL HAVE A PROBLEM - WITHOUT THE NEGRO around.

The European Secular Socialist Left has largely taken over Europe and the church there is as weak as it has ever been in the past 1,000 years.

While YOU ALL might be disturbed about Middle Eastern and African rates of immigration into Europe - this still doesn't mask the problem between the Right-Wing which vents its anger at the "football" matches and the (largely) ruling Secular Socialists that have the balance of power.

Put aside the "Negroes" and it seems that you still have a massive problem with your "skin brothers" who want nothing more than to reject your -

* Economic
* Social
* Educational
* Religious
* Law Enforcement priorities
* Foreign Policy

Surely you are not so set on talking about us Colored Folks that you can't manage to spend one post talking about your Ideological divergent blood brothers?

Anonymous said...

I was surprised that O'Reilly was so annoyed by what the U-of-Minn did. Maybe to make up for the butt-kissing interview of the very arrogant and entitled, very odd looking illegal Jose Antonio Vargas.

Zenster said...

“society was setup for us [whites]“

What in hell were we supposed to do, set up a society for Eskimos? Of course, America was set up for Whites. White people built it. What countries in Asia or Africa have been constructed for anyone save their own originating race?

The most preposterous thing of all is that this notion of America having to accommodate every last race on earth is that such an idiotic notion can get any traction at all. It shows just how far along the brainwashing has gotten and just how thoroughly punch drunk White America is on the Liberal Kool-Aid.

One included a presentation by Tim Wise, author of Dear White America. In his book, Wise confesses a “longstanding fantasy” where he turns to a man with a “God Bless the USA” button and asks him, “why can’t you just get over it?”

I hope that Mr. Wise gets his opportunity to do just that and I hope he says that vile crap to an career Marine who then treats him to a lengthy and extended session of intensive parking lot therapy.

White America owes nothing to Black America; once people understand this, the immigration problem and the "Muslim" problem can be dealt with overnight -- but until white people in America understand that they are not to blame for the plight (and blight) of Black Americans, well, you might as well look to Detroit in 2012 as the future of all of the nation.

Each passing day, with its flash robs, Knock Out King attacks and set-piece extortion scams by race baiting wannabe warlord pimps, only serves to cement the idea that it's either or. Either we can have nice things … or we can have Detroit. But we cannot have both.

For example, I marched for civil rights with Dr. King in 1963 - long before Hollywood found it fashionable. But when I told an audience last year that white pride is just as valid as black pride or red pride or anyone else's pride, they called me a racist.

Then so be it. Let these intolerant Liberal bastards spawn the biggest group of well-armed racists in American history and devil take the hindmost. To paraphrase an old Danish saying:

To call a man a racist gives him the right to be one.

So, go ahead, call me and as many other people as you like racist. Sow the wind, reap the whirlwind you damned bastards.

In one moment, this cultural war could end. Few people dare say that the "cultural war" is really a racial war, an attempt to permanently subjugate white people into a form of financial servitude (you can exist as long as you keep paying taxes to promote the proliferation of non-whites, who will day vote for more and more goodies that you will pay for).

This conflict is almost entirely a racial war in that it is first and foremost directed against Whites. People constantly mistake the presence of Black and Muslim foot soldiers as being the source of racial allegations. But it is the eradication of White Middle class America that tops the transnational globalist agenda.

America is almost ready for the Fair Campaign. Are you?

Ready as I'll ever be.

Anonymous said...

An idea for a billboard in Duluth (or anywhere):

Make it simple. It's the best phrase I've heard yet:

"STEREOTYPES SAVE LIVES"

For a background, just use some city or street scene (such as a rundown warehousey area near a downtown) sans people. Let viewers come to their own conclusions.

Anonymous said...

Would some one please shoot Moore's fatasss out of a Cannon."

Did you know that there was a 2008 Hollywood movie that parodied Micheal Moore? It was called "An American Carol."

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1190617/

"Storyline

At a July 4 barbecue, gramps tells the kids the story of Michael Malone, a documentary filmmaker and Michael Moore look-alike who hates America and wants to abolish July 4th. He refuses to celebrate with his nephew Josh, who's shipping out soon to the Middle East. That night, Michel has a vision of his hero, JFK, who predicts that three ghosts will visit Michael. Sure enough, General Patton, George Washington, and country music star Trace Adkins visit Michael show him the fruits of patriotism, just wars, and pacifism. Meanwhile, Arab terrorists want Malone to help them with a propaganda film. Is he the next Leni Riefenstahl or will he see the light?

WTF said...

http://freebeacon.com/target-syrian-wmd/

I know where Iraqis WMDS went >.>

Anonymous said...

Tim wise is the type that will help you help him. Ask why he and his kind care so much about others status or whatever certain types "need". Does he care really?

Paul's Biggest Fan said...

Yeah. I'm ready.

Anonymous said...

Mutant Swarm- there is a MSM psyops campaign against whites. I don't think the Los Angeles Times has ever had an article on the negative effects of immigration to the USA.. At least once a week there is an "Undocumented Indian woman gives birth to World Teacher and faces deportation" or something similar. Another way they frame the subject is this article "Republican must woo Latino voters to win in 2102".

Anonymous said...

I liked Heston's statements that "... white pride is just as valid as black pride or red pride or anyone else's pride ...", and "... when I told an audience that gay rights should extend no further than your rights or my rights ..."

Why on earth isn't it just a "given" that each, all, or any member of {xxx group} has the same freedoms, rights, and responsibilities that I do (--and no more); while at the same time *I* have the same freedoms, rights, and responsibilities as any member of {xxx group} (--and no more) ??

How could that concept be too hard to grasp? And how on earth did we ever get suckered into the idea of "special rules for special people"?

Zenster said...

Anon (6/22 7:03 PM ): "STEREOTYPES SAVE LIVES"

Unless, due to your anonymity, you make any strenuous objections, that one goes into the Catalog of Race Realism Memes.

Author Olivia Manning of "Balkan Trilogy" fame came very close to this thought when she said (paraphrase):

The problem with stereotypes is that there's usually a good reason for them.

In a similar vein, it may have been Oscar Wilde who said:

Without generalizations, nothing could be taught

Then again, remember how he also said that:

Nothing that is worth knowing can be taught.

Anonymous said...

The man from Buffalo may get bashed by the media but he spoke calmly and didn't try to back peddle. He wasn't baited by the squealing nut job interviewing him.

His demeanor of calm authority combined with his good looks will ensure this interview benefits him in the long run. He said what everyone knows. Men will respect him, women will think he is hot (at least I do and it had more to do with his leadership and honesty than his looks). Someday he can play this clip for his children and show that he was honest about race before it was commonly understood and talked about publicly.

90404 said...

IT REMINDS ME OF THE NAZIS:
PINK TRIANGLE FOR GAYS
STARS FOR JEWS...


THAT LEVEL OF HATE..........

ANYONE AGREE?

Bob1313 said...

Constructive feedback: why do all black people have to justify comments everywhere with a run down of their educational credentials?

Just curious because in the majority of the white population, the honor society, MBA's etc... That's all a given and a very much expected outcome, I'll give you a little hint along with a dose of humility, the vast majority of white people you encounter on a daily basis graduated from college with a BA or BS as a minimum.

In reality no one cares if SFO falls into the bay tomorrow,just save Sonoma and Napa.

Oh yeah as a proud conservative trust me when I tell you that your prog buddies will NEVER be re encamping with conservatives, those naive do gooders will never make it past your tribal brethren, not to mention the only re encamping they'd be doing in our circles would be from the end of a rope.

AnalogMan said...

Oh, sh!t, nigrit is here. Quick, Paul, swat it before it multiplies.

Anonymous said...

The great thing about the guy from Buffalo was how unprepared and stupid the reporter acted. I think the reporter was smart enough to know he wasn't on the internet so he couldn't use the typical response of: "You are a racist, that means I do not have to respond to any point you make. I can just call you names over and over and people will cheer for me." However, he wasn't smart enough to say anything but whine about fairness and stutter.

As he stood there with dead air like a fool, I could feel him reciting over and over in his head "Really?..." "Really?..." "Seriously?" with some goofy face. That is the extent of the defense of "The Narrative" that the typical person can come up with today. We aren't dealing with people raised in a world with standards who have abandoned them like we were decades ago. Now we are dealing with their offspring and the most they can come up with is name calling and ironic bullshit.



One thing mainstream conservatives should be doing is calling out the left on its obvious strategy of turning all arguments into racial arguments. The mainstream conservatives need to let people know it is okay to ignore the left. They also need to enact protections for people who are targeted by the left for disagreeing, which means protecting people accused of racism. There should be laws protecting people's employment and their employers from harassment by leftist trash for employing a racist. They should also have strong laws against showing up at a person's house for a protest. It is crazy that nobody has made laws against this obvious attempt to squelch political speech.

I remember early in the Obama presidency there was a black seiu protest at some banker's house because they couldn't get money from him or something. His kid was in the house alone and though he was going to die. The hilarious thing is this banker was a big Obama supporter.

Whiskey said...

Excellent post. Out of all the outstanding ones, the best you've done. Apologies for not following threads, family illness has kept computer usage light.

And FWIW, John Mayer still has his "hood pass" in which he said his member was a member of the KKK and used the word Black people hate (when Whites use it, it begins the the letter 'N').

NOTHING HAPPENED TO HIM. He's John Mayer. Women love him. In this country, and the West, if women love you, you can do anything. If not, nothing.

RobertB said...

Nicely done, Paul. I always liked Heston. Quite a man. He had guts, too, didn't he? He went right into the heart of Liberalism and spoke truth to power.

What a Man.

Whiskey said...

Let me add, the FAIR people at Duluth did not pick a guy who looks like Mayer, or Russell Brand, or Robert Pattinson, or any guy women drool over. Or a girl who looks like the favorite female idols: Kim Kardashian, Katy Perry, Jennifer Aniston.

No. They chose a fairly young, not particularly masculine looking boy, with fair skin not dark "manly" skin and with delicate not masculine features. They chose deliberately a male model women would not like much, or feel much desire for.

Anonymous said...

If whites ever got a hero to rally around, a white MLK if you will, average whites everywhere would go mad trying to pull him down, maybe even kill him. (Think Pym Fortuyn.) Most whites are completely brainwashed, and sadly, I don't think they'll ever wake up.

Whites have this like 'Goody Two Shoes Syndrome' going on, and will go to incredible lengths to fight what they think is 'evil'. (Racism = EVIL.) I think most average whites see us race realist / white nationalist types as just a step above child molesters.

Constructive Feedback said...

[quote]White America owes nothing to Black America[/quote]

Still no responses that exclusively focus upon the "Intra-WHITE" Ideological gun fight without including Negroes as the key point of conflict.

I am not sure why you all keep driving the notion that ALL Black people are looking for REPARATIONS.

Surely after studying Black people as much as you do - you see the factions.

YES - the Left Wing/Progressive Fundamentalist - BLACK RACIAL SERVICES MACHINE - that is partnered with WHITE LIBERALS are driving for "Quasi-Reparations". They Work Off Of INDICTMENTS as a driver for their mission.

YES - the voices in the 'Black Media' and Blogs - from which you are drawing your opinions of what the average Black thinks - believe in quasi-Reparations

YES - poor Blacks - LIKE MOST OTHER POOR PEOPLE - don't give a damn what JUSTIFICATION a new stream of money comes from. They want MONEY more than they want REPARATIONS AGAINST YOU KIND WHITE FOLKS.

Go into a poor White town and dangle a "get rich quick" scheme and you will have the same take rate.

In my OBSERVATIONS of you "Kind Conservative White Folks" - who "Watch Black Folks" - you can't bring yourselves to understand the nuances of what is going on. Among Black people, as among AMERICANS AS A WHOLE - the break down of DIGNITY and the rejection of "Social Welfare" is at the root of the problem. NOT some intrinsic character related to Black people.

THIS NEGRO RIGHT HERE sees that there are always strings attached to being GIVEN ANYTHING. I argue that if you can't define the equal flow of VALUES in a transaction - then you need to reject this as a viable source of income.

While, of course, working involves selling your skills and labor for a pay check - Welfare involves an individual receiving money so they can live with the greater society expressing their view that no American shall live below a certain standard of living.

Here is the CLOSED LOOP of that transaction that you all don't get. YES there is a reverse flow from the Poor. That poor person receiving government benefit transacts his AFFIRMATION AND REGARD for the government. Unfortunately it doesn't benefit the government but the SOCIAL JUSTICE ADVOCATES who seek to control the government. THEY receive THE VOTES as a return trip in the transaction.

This Negro who is looking at the DEVELOPMENT of my people see this as a bad deal in the long run.
I see the day that when you "Kind White Conservatives folks" seek to circle the wagons and then your DWL's realize that they indeed value their White Privilege and then "come back home" with you - continuing your fight on your own lands.

This leaves the Negro having to rely upon all of the cultural, social, religious, economic and academic institutions as the means of maintaining his civility. This Negro believes that we need to be developing these systems TO-DAMNED-DAY because America's days are waning.


In closing - How can I become a member emeritus of the "Good Conservative White Folks Club" as a Black guy who is critical of the Black Racial Services Machine and their White Progressive Cheshire Fox joint venture partners that are USING Black people as pawns? I promise that I won't act as a "Spook By The Door" and won't touch the White women members.

MuayTyson said...

Say what you want about Beck but it is no he who is important it is his audience. Read the comments next time you visit the Blaze and you will see what the average Beck audience feels about black pathology and mass immigration illegal or otherwise.

Beck can be discarded soon enough. I firmly believe that more than have of his followers are open to HBD and White preservation.

This goes for Limbaugh, Lavin, Savage, or who ever else claims to be conservative but stops just short of the truth.

Dissident said...

Constructive Feedback said.

"Thus this brings my point.
YOU STILL HAVE A PROBLEM - WITHOUT THE NEGRO around"

We're all aware of this. You're not disclosing anything that we aren't already painfully aware of here CF.

The problems facing all of us are legion and it's no secret the 'establishment' uses the Negro as his shock troops in the war on Western civilization. If you were all back in the motherland of Nubia today, we'd still have to contend with some other threat to our way of life.

Rest easy brother, we're all in this together. But for the moment, at least I can take solace in knowing that some militant minority isn't raping, stealing or pillaging my way of life-not!

Van said...

Heston: Well, we have, probably a more mixed ethnicity, than other countries, some other countries.
Moore pounces on Heston's shocking faux pas:
Moore: ...So you think it's an ethnic thing?
-------
I believe I've posted the racial breakdown for gun homicide here before, but will do so later today (time permitting). For now:

Despite very high levels of gun ownership, white gun homicide rates are in line with those of Western European countries - including those with the most stringent gun laws. Black and Latino rates resemble those of the third world.

If memory serves, the black rate is around 22/100k, the Latino rate around 13/100k, and the white rate 1-2/100k.

Anonymous said...

These type campaigns actually originate with the government and finds its way into the mainstream with propaganda such as shown in this article. For years now it's been government policy to promote race mixing, school integration, mixing up of neighborhoods, making it all seem desirable via the media, funding all such efforts, etc etc. It's been actively promoted for many years now under both parties. This has been the long term policy irregardless of who is in the White House. Having a nation of mischlings is what the goal is, decided by the plutocracy. Democracy in this country is an illusion.

Don M said...

I have a gut feeling that the anti-whites are becoming so shrill because they are losing control of the dialogue and they know it.

The Unfair campaign is so ridiculous and over the top it is like a parody of a parody.

Tim Wise has become unhinged and his writings are hysterical (in the literal sense) as is the case with Mark Potok.

I don't think young people are buying it. The young people always rebel against orthodoxies.

While the whole anti-white privilege movement was embraced by the youth counter-culture 40 years ago, it has since become an established orthodoxy. Furthermore, its a belief system that runs counter to observable facts.

I think more of the young whites than we know of reject it as the blathering of old white hippies.

This is one of the reasons that I am not as pessimistic about the future as current conditions would seem to dictate.

Q'Ron Jamal said...

Damn, don't you hate it when u be out celebratin' Juneteenth at the strip club and a shootin break out?

http://abclocal.go.com/ktrk/story?section=news/local&id=8707875

Anonymous said...

Let's not just complain -- let's do something.

Give them hell. Call them up, e-mail them, fax them, send them physical mail.

http://www.d.umn.edu/contact/

Anonymous said...

“society was setup for us [whites]“

What in hell were we supposed to do, set up a society for Eskimos?


Inspired by the most logical race in the galaxy, the Vulcans wouldn't we be better off following them than Whites?

Ore said...

On top of what everybody else said, I offer this observation:

Liberals believe in something akin to the Christian doctrine of original sin.

But it only applies to White people, and there is no atonement other than race suicide.

Anonymous said...

(N. Ga)--Thanks to the comments and commenters links a few articles ago about the Katrina Super-dome. I finally got some answers. I have always wondered. “Africa In Our Midst, lessons from Katrina” Is in my opinion, a must read for any white still delusional to what a crowd of blacks will do when they feel there is no law, and they out number you. It doesn't have to be the majority that does the harm. The fact of the matter is, the majority will do nothing to stop it.
“Africa In Our Midst” A must read. See how it matches up to their “stories and campaign, detailing the tale of whiteness as the ultimate form of evil” An excerpt.....
(One black man, observing the chaos from abroad, took a different view. Leighton Levy wrote in the Sept. 2 Jamaica Star: “I am beginning to believe that black people, no matter where in the world they are, are cursed with a genetic predisposition to steal, murder, and create mayhem.” He wanted to know why there was no footage of white looters: “Is it that the media are not showing pictures of them looting and robbing?......... Or is it that they are too busy trying to stay alive, waiting to be rescued, and hiding from the blacks?”
Ninety-nine percent of the white people left New Orleans when the evacuation order went out. Some 80,000 blacks could not or would not leave. Whites did not “leave them behind,” as the editorial-writers keep telling us. No one could have gotten some of them to leave, but if it was anyone’s job to give them the option, it was that of the black-run city government. Of the blacks who stayed, probably only a minority committed crimes, but they were enough to turn the city into a hell hole. Some did unspeakable things: loot hospitals, fire on rescue teams, destroy ambulances. No amount of excuse-making and finger-pointing can paper over degeneracy like that. Black people—and only black people—did these things.

Dissident said...

Cry me a river of crocodile tears Constructive Feedback.

First of all, quit calling me a conservative white Amerikan. I'm probably more a populist than a conservative. Look it up. By definition I'm concerned for the welfare of all. Black, yellow, red, brown and white; just not at the expense of my own race and way of life-capiche?

I grew up around many Negro's and actually had good repoire with them mostly, but then things changed for me as I became aware of their TRIBALISM. That much venerated AFRICAN TRIBALISM. You know, the kind where color is thicker than water.

My wish is for you to prosper and for your race to prosper, but I'll be damned if I want that to happen at my expense through RFBA ( run for black Amerika) shakedown schemes by the long-legged mack daddy Obama and his DWL handlers.

Anonymous said...

In every white country where blacks exist in large numbers they have become a parasitical population feeding off of and sustained by the majority white population while offering no benefit to that population~ unless one considers rape, murder, theft, community decay and parasitism to be benefits.
In every country or city where they are the majority, they create nothing but a third world environment characterized by ignorance,widespread poverty, high crime rates, violence and corruption.
This in not a problem that can be solved by others. One can simply choose to continue to subsidize such behaviors at the expense of ones' own people or face the reality that sometimes the "patient" cannot be helped and the wisest course of action is to stop wasting time, effort and money on such a foolish enterprise.
A realist understands this but DWL's still believe that they can make a difference despite all the evidence to the contrary. This is akin to believing that one can take a large group of severely retarded individuals and (through concerted efforts by those that care) that, one day, the retarded individuals will no longer be retarded but fully functional and contributing members of society who are no longer a liability but an asset.
Idiotic beliefs similar to this analogy are at the core of the religion of political correctness that DWL's adhere to.
The optimum solution would be segregation- let the DWL's pursue and fund their delusions separate from the rest of us in their own region alongside their sacred cows the negro.
They will fail utterly and be consumed by their sacred cows but at least the rest of us would then be free of both!

josh said...

Yes we DO have unfair advantages! Because I am white I dont have to fear that a black man will assault my white knuckles with his face,I dont have to worry that a black man will attack my foot with his head,nor drag his throat across my brand new clean knofe! It must be so frightening to be a young black male in a hoodie in todays rayciss environment. With Mitt Romney running for president,with Rush Limbaugh on the radio spreading hate. With Gov Walker attacking working people... (fade to laugher and applause) I wish SOMEBODY would write an Open Letter to Young Black Males warning them of the danger they face...among white people!!

Zenster said...

Mutant Swarm: The current Army/USMC psyops manual is available here in PDF form. Download it, study it, and use it to fight the cultural war.

A shorter version is available here as a web page. Download it or save it as a complete web page. This one, especially, will allow you to identify enemy propaganda techniques.

It's time we picked up our enemies' weapons and turned them against them.


Well worth downloading and thank you for the links, Mutant Swarm. They've already come in handy diagnosing Ivan Shatov's little temper tantrum in the "Psychological Torture" thread.

~AV~ said...

To Constructive Feedback

Why do so many feral blacks lap up violent and vulgar rap music, and entertain themselves with WorldStarHipHop shit?

My problem with blacks are the hordes who reject civil society's rules and try to destroy this civil behavior with black accepted vulgarity and violence.

I am always guaranteed a public display of child abuse when I see sheboons shuffling thru a store in their pajamas and slippers when they have their snotty nosed spawn crying and carrying on...in tow.

I should start a similar website to the Walmart people, limited to sheboon behavior in public places.

Zenster said...

Anon (6/23 9:47 AM): This in not a problem that can be solved by others. One can simply choose to continue to subsidize such behaviors at the expense of ones' own people or face the reality that sometimes the "patient" cannot be helped and the wisest course of action is to stop wasting time, effort and money on such a foolish enterprise.

Your medical analogy is excellent and needs to taken one step further. Patients that are unresponsive even to "heroic measures" are then typically "taken off of life support".

This is what must be done with Black America. Remove the economic stilts―welfare, TANF, EBT, Section 8, school lunch programs, minority owned business loans, Affirmative Action, minority hiring quotas―that prop up Black communities and let them savor the taste of what is required to actually survive. Any attempt to reach out with parasitic criminal tentacles must see them promptly lopped off.

Idiotic beliefs similar to this analogy are at the core of the religion of political correctness that DWL's adhere to.

What more perfect opportunity to trot out Magical Thinking™? Even the very best wishes and intentions will shatter against the brick wall of reality. Einstein noted how:

Insanity is doing the same thing, over and over again, but expecting different results.

DWLs have been doing the same thing repeatedly with respect to Blacks without any change in the results, save in a negative manner. They must not be allowed to crash middle class America into the brick wall of futile Black uplift. Their continued efforts to do exactly that constitute a form of insanity which should qualify them for institutionalization.

The optimum solution would be segregation- let the DWL's pursue and fund their delusions separate from the rest of us in their own region alongside their sacred cows the negro.

In a sense, we are seeing this with the city of Portland. DWLs have thrown open the gates for their pet minorities and are now getting their collective @ss handed back to them on a plate. Maybe I'll squeeze out a tear for them somewhere down the road, not.

Bogolyubski said...

@ "Contructive Feedback": If you've been following this forum at all, you will see there is considerable discussion of what you refer to as the intra-white conflict. You also seem to be expressing a concern that once things collapse sufficiently, the DWL whites who support BRA will abruptly toss their negro clients under the proverbial bus - which could potentially pose a danger to blacks who attempt to adhere to traditional values (in the case of blacks, often rooted in some form of Christianity).

The term DWL is not really a very good one to describe the group of whites who support BRA - which you describe as a "Black Racial Services Machine". There are really at least four groups of whites here:

1) Members of the ruling oligarchy, whose ultimate objective appears to be a one-world government run by them and solely for their benefit. They serve the 'God of this world' and are incredibly evil - though in their personal lives they are very sober and disciplined. These folks are pretty hard to read in a way. Their present endorsement of cultural marxism may simply be a means to an end - their permanent rule of the planet. Most prefer to not be in the public arena, though a few are. The oligarchs are in control of every single institution in the western world. The only places on the planet they do not control (due to competing oligarchies) are China, Russia and the Islamic world.

2) The white 'true-believers' in the Marxist-utopian agenda, a number of whom are openly genocidal. Tim Wise is a superb example of this. Ditto for the dirtbags in Duluth. As I remarked on another thread, these folks are more fanatical about their utopian quasi-religion than the wildest goat-humping jihadi in the poppyfields of Pashtoonistan. Note that there do seem to be some members of the oligarch category above who are 'true believers' in this utopian fanaticism, so these categories don't have absolute boundaries (though there is no crossover between 4 and 1).

3) The careerist whites who obsequiously serve, like the stereotypical step-n-fetchit slave, the oligarchs mentioned in the first category above. They will do whatever it takes, betray, cheat, swindle, lie, and otherwise whore their way into a well-paid position in service to their masters. The only thing they care about is their personal advancement. Typical Republicans, in short.

4) The stupefied, dumbed-down, publik-skool-edjumacated idiocracy who can't be bothered to think for themselves even a little. They care only about alcohol or recreational pharmaceuticals and moronic 'entertainment' like NFL football. They actually cannot comprehend that the rather obvious fact that the Ministry of Truth lies 24 x 7 x 365 about black-on-white criminality, to take one significant example. They typically parrot Marxist talking-points learned by rote in the edjumacation system K-to doctorate level. Indeed, there are some notions in the PCMC religion which are so incredibly stupid that only a PhD could believe in them. Now and again, some of these folks actually have the scales fall from the eyes.

Calling us "conservatives" is not very accurate either. There's basically nothing left to 'conserve'. Those who PK (and others) call "Conservatism, Inc." are really DWLs of the second and third categories mentioned above who are engaged in a campaign of deceit. The Republican party, for example, is completely owned by their oligarch masters and operated by them. Rich Lowry of National Review is a perfect exemplar of this type, as are the majority of black "conservatives".

Zenster said...

Don M: I have a gut feeling that the anti-whites are becoming so shrill because they are losing control of the dialogue and they know it.

The Unfair campaign is so ridiculous and over the top it is like a parody of a parody.


This much is true. There is no other explanation for how strident the DWLs have become. Their protestations have become shrieks and arguments by them instantly descend into Name Calling:

This technique attempts to arouse prejudices in an audience by labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as something the target audience fears, hates, loathes, or finds undesirable.

Types of name calling:
-Direct name calling is used when the audience is sympathetic or neutral. It is a simple, straightforward attack on an opponent or opposing idea.
-Indirect name calling is used when direct name calling would antagonize the audience. It is a label for the degree of attack between direct name calling and insinuation. Sarcasm and ridicule are employed with this technique.
-Cartoons, illustrations, and photographs are used in name calling, often with deadly effect.

Dangers inherent in name calling: In its extreme form, name calling may indicate that the propagandist has lost his sense of proportion or is unable to conduct a positive campaign. Before using this technique, the propagandist must weigh the benefits against the possible harmful results. It is best to avoid use of this device. The obstacles are formidable, based primarily on the human tendency to close ranks against a stranger. For example, a group may despise, dislike, or even hate one of its leaders, even openly criticize him, but may (and probably will) resent any non group member who criticizes and makes disparaging remarks against that leader.
[emphasis added]

Where I am tempted to disagree is about how "young people always rebel against orthodoxies". Modern media's control of The Narrative™ is so tight now that Universalist consumerism has remained in place since the time of the Yuppies.

After all, the Occupy Wall Street types are nothing but ├╝ber-Liberal Yuppies. All that distinguishes them is an even greater sense of entitlement, mountains of student loan debt and a willingness to occasionally break decorum. Other than that, OWS is gripped as tightly as ever in the talons of Political Correctness.

For that reason, I have strong reservations about modern youth rebelling against the orthodoxy of PCMC (Politically Correct Multi-Culturalism). We are still a long way from the perpetual cries of "racism" finally diluting themselves from overuse.

[to be continued]

Zenster said...

Equally disturbing is how little objection there is from modern youth regarding attempts at gun control. This deafening silence indicates a serious void in any understanding of Constitutional Rights and what it takes to repulse tyranny. In fact, so much of PCMC is a study in tyranny―as in: people serving the government instead of government serving the people―that seeing America's young unblinkingly swallow whole such a boatload of philosophical balderdash is very discouraging. Few better examples of this exist than Europe's largely White Antifa (Anti-Fascist) groups, who use every trick in the Fascist playbook to thwart pro-White, anti-Islamic Defense Leagues.

So long as Liberals retain their death-grip on academia and the media, deprogramming modern youth is going to be extremely difficult. It is almost to the point where, as with Portland, DWLs must be granted their multi-cultural wish so that they each can have their eye-opening moment, more commonly known as being mugged or raped.

The problem is that time really does not permit for such a glacial process. Too much of modern civilization will have been demolished and too many promising (White) lives destroyed by the time enough DWLs have had the scales fall from their eyes. Gramsci was probably well aware of this in formulating his "long march through the institutions".

At present, the one thing we have on our side is the internet. Ergo, the frantic scramble by BRA and the EU to place filters and limits on it. The internet is a force multiplier par excellence which turns sites like SBPDL into a powerful soapbox in a global "speaker's corner".

It is one reason why I tend to comment at length here at SBPDL. There is an urgency which demands a maximum effort towards unmasking the transnational globalist elite's insidious agenda. Disinfecting sunlight is our most potent weapon and getting the facts out before people in a rational and calm manner remains the best way of reaching our goal of reawakening White America to the perils that beset it.

Anonymous said...

"Inspired by the most logical race in the galaxy, the Vulcans wouldn't we be better off following them than Whites?"

If you have green blood, pointy ears and only have sex once every seven years, yes. I don't meet most of those qualifications.

Anonymous said...

@ Dissident, …...First of all, quit calling me a conservfative white Amerikan. I'm probably more a populist than a conservative. Look it up. By definition I'm concerned for the welfare of all. Black, yellow, red, brown and white; just not at the expense of my own race and way of life-capiche?
Thank you, Two thumbs up!....beautiful response to CF

Zenster said...

WTF: Would some one please shoot Moore's fatasss out of a Cannon.

I'd prefer that he got the 71 Virginians treatment.

Anonymous said...

Mutant Swarm said...
The current Army/USMC psyops manual is available here in PDF form. Download it, study it, and use it to fight the cultural war


I did download, but its 400? pages and Technical,,,
in 1000 words or less, whats it all baout alpha?

Anonymous said...

Duluth Minnesota is about as white as it gets in America these days. Too cold for most "minorities". My guess is very few blacks but maybe some Hispanics doing farm work and other grunt work. So making whites feel like shit over alleged racism at the local state university in Duluth is hilarious.

WIKIPEDIA-
The rural area is mostly populated by whites and has remained a Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party stronghold because of its history of a largely unionized workforce in the mining industry, the mainstay of the economy of the Iron Range. In 2004, John Kerry carried most of the counties in the region by a comfortable margin. This was perhaps aided by George W. Bush referring to the area as the "Iron Ridge" in a campaign speech. Barack Obama outperformed Kerry in 2008, carrying every county in the Iron Range. The area remains the greatest Democratic stronghold in Minnesota along with the urban centers of Minneapolis and St. Paul.

Constructive Feedback said...

Dissident, others:

You (White) guys are cracking me up.

You keep focusing upon the dependent pathology of Black people - yet you can't bring yourself to see that GOOD WHITE FOLKS, still the monopoly majority in this nation ALSO like to drink from the "Social Justice Trough".

NO I am not going to go through a "You All Are In The Mud TOO" spiel.

I am one of those "rare Negroes" who see the strategic mistake of not adhering to the old tale about the "Farmer And The Wild Mountain Boars" - in which he captured them by feeding them and reducing the perimeter of the fence until he had them trapped. The town later feasted on pork.

You all are so obsessed with BLACK PEOPLE that you can't see that the GREATER THREAT is the Nancy Pelosi/Ted Kennedy types.

If I told you that it is my opinion that TED KENNEDY did more damage to "Black Consciousness" than any other elected official in the last 50 years with his Social Justice B.S. - would this let you know that you are mistaken as you look at BLACK ELECTED OFFICIALS and what they think rather than large segments of the Black Community that reject their B.S.?

The bottom line is that more Americans than what you might want to accept are "Trying To Get Over", placing their straw in the National Treasury trough, trying to get something out of it.

THIS NEGRO HERE is focused on the INSTITUTIONS within the Black community that have been allowed to erode, that will be necessary to be in place once America has her tragic economic collapse.

And YES I own 4 handguns so don't send any of your "Good Ole Boy Friends" over to my house to help themselves because they don't believe that a Ninja should be living better than they are.

Anonymous said...

If George W Bush was at fault for the murders that did not take place in the Superdome wouldn't he also be responsible for the rapes that did (One picture of a victim is available on another "Those who can see" site.) and we all know how much feminists dislike rape don't we?

Anonymous said...

Dudes you got the message wrong about white privilege. Even a genius like Michael Moore would find it hard to read black ink off black skin.

Anonymous said...

"It's easy to imagine racism in others whom you feel morally superior to anyway."

"It's hard to see racism in non-whites when you need them at the polls."

A few more of these and you have your ad.

Anonymous said...

Haven't many Somali "refugees" been resettled in Minn.? I just read in the War $treet Journal about the difficulties the refugees are having wiring money back to Somalia. It seems that the practice could be used as a conduit for financing terrorists.

So on the one hand, our government facilitates the mass resettlement of paleolithic people and all the expense and risk it entails while simultaneously prosecuting a global war on terror as well as our personal liberties.

I am sure it's not deliberate - just short sighted.

Anonymous said...

Zenster - Giving a link to Free Republic has destroyed your credibility.

Discard said...

Bob1313 at 10:10PM: MBAs and membership in honor societies are not a given among Whites. The majority of Whites do not have four year degrees, let alone the vast majority. You ought to get out of the Frisco area more. There are lots of decent White folks who do the dirty work of the country, without academic credentials.

WTF said...

@ Zenster

Thats amazing.

Zenster said...

Anon (6/23 12:44 PM): in 1000 words or less, whats it all about alpha?

Read Mutant Swarm's second link on "Propaganda Techniques". It is brief and and excellent run-up to the Army Psyops Manual.

Zenster said...

Bogolyubski, when you drop the hyperbole, your writing gets even better. The four categories of BRA enablers that you listed is an excellent dissection of the who, what, where, when, how and why of the forces arrayed against us.

I suggest that you flesh out that comment into a full grown essay for publication here at SBPDL. It would really help a lot of people, newcomers especially, to tweeze out where the enemy lurks.

Discard said...

90404 at 10:10 PM: The Nazis did not put pink triangles on homosexuals like the yellow stars on Jews. That is a disgusting attempt by homos to grab some holocaust points and to smear any opponents as Nazis. The pink triangle was used in German prisons before the Nazis came to power, as a way to segregate homos and protect them from being abused by other prisoners.
The Nazis did not attempt to kill homos en masse. Rather than abusing yourself with the whole book, read the back of "The Pink Triangle", the standard popular work on the supposed "gay holocaust". It will tell you that the Nazis killed "Thousands" of homos. Not even tens of thousands. By the standards of the Nazis, 10 or 20 thousand dead is a pittance. No, it's not nice, but clearly, they weren't making any real effort. Aside from convicted molesters and the homosexual clique that ran the Brownshirts (Look up Ernst Rohm), Nazis killed homos more as a matter of personal preference on the part of individual mini-fuhrers. Any notion of a "Gay Holocaust" is an ugly attempt to equate the deaths of a few thousand homos with genocide.

Zenster said...

Anon (6/23, 2012 2:32 PM): Zenster - Giving a link to Free Republic has destroyed your credibility.

Mutant Swarm is the one who originally provided it. The information at the link about propaganda techniques is accurate. That is all I care about. This is the first time I have ever visited the web site and there is no compelling reason to visit it again.

Anonymous said...

I think "Constructive Feedback" is correct in his analysis.
I would like to add that it wasn't the blacks who ruined this country. They never had that much power.
The black race didn't sell us down the river in 1913 with the passing of the federal reserve act, handing all power over in this country to the rothschilds and other big-shot bankers.White christian lawmakers did that. And they did it with full free will and volition.
The blacks didn't dismantle our industry and ship it to China;they didn't destroy american industry,hand us fiat money,start massive immigration, flood the country with drugs like heroin and cocaine,get us involved in wars based on lies for the benefit of a hand full of billionaire families:rothschilds,rockefellers,
duponts,etc.
The blacks didn't force us- the white race throughout the West- to have giant internecine wars(WW1 and WW2),about 70 million dead whites all together between the two wars-- all killed down by fellow whites.Many young were killed down before ever reproducing: An eternal loss of blood for our race.
The blacks are responding to the breakdown of the USA,but they didn't cause it.
It's important to protect yourself from street criminals,but blaming the blacks doesn't cover up the great culpability of the white race in the destruction of America.
We were to be the guardians and gatekeepers of the countrty,but we failed miserably.
And yes, Ted Kennedy and all the others who opened the country up to the whole world in 1965 are surely traitors.That's for sure.Joe

Anonymous said...

"You all are so obsessed with BLACK PEOPLE that you can't see that the GREATER THREAT is the Nancy Pelosi/Ted Kennedy types."

Constructive Feedback, I read your blog regularly, and I respect your independence from the black-pack victim mentality.

However, your assertion that we are "obsessed" with black people misses the mark, in my opinion.

We are obsessed with the "Big Lie".

Personally, I find it infuriating and offensive that we're all supposed to play along with the absurd notion that all races are "exactly alike". It's like The Emperor's New Clothes...except it's not a fable, it's reality. Yet if anyone calls attention to it, they're ostracized and attacked as a "racist".

Sheila said...

Guys, stop responding to yet another black who claims he has nothing he didn't earn. There's not a black in America under the age of 50 who hasn't benefited, directly or indirectly, from affirmative action, preferential hiring, discriminatory scholarships, and lowered standards. First he tries the whole Mr. Evergreen spiel, about how smart and credentialed and capable he is, so why on earth would anyone but foul racists have a problem with him. Then comes the pity party and the anti-White animus (we're evil White foxes or wolves to him), and then comes the open hostility and challenge (he has guns, y'all, so watch out!).

All this is contained in the standard, overlong comment, full of poor diction, awkward sentence structure, and incorrect grammar. Add a few unnecessary multisyllabic words and rhetoric to give the impression of a learned individual, and you have your standard pseudo-educated IKAGO black. He just wants to be your friend.

Paul, truly, you don't need to try to liven up the comments with his blather. There are plenty of interesting people to read and comment here without unnecessary distraction and subterfuge.

Zenster said...

Lawrence Auster has published an article about the robbery and murder of Chinese food delivery driver, Zhen Bo Liu. Readers at SBPDL have already posted links to the news story about this.

Thank goodness this happened in North Carolina where serious offenses cause 16 year-olds to automatically be tried as adults. All of them deserve a date with Mr. Needle. To these sub-human demons, this poor man's life was worth something like $60.00 of chicken wings and shrimp fried rice.

The stolen food was then shared out among the entire group of five right after the killing took place. They then returned to rob Mr. Liu's corpse of $48.00. These little scumbags really need to be left shackled in a room filled with the surviving family members and a good supply of aluminum baseball bats.

The Russians have a more sophisticated technique where they methodically break every bone in your body starting with the fingers and toes and then working their way up to the torso. Recipients of this treatment are said to leave amazing flexible corpses.

Auster goes on to note:

And there is NO PUBLIC DISCUSSION about the threat of feral homicidal blacks in our society. As I recall, a few decades ago this extraordinary black violence was discussed. It was acknowledged as a major social problem. But now it’s disappeared, following the leftist-egalitarian dynamic of Auster’s First Law which says that the worse minority behavior becomes, the more it must be covered up. America has given birth to the most savage, primitive, predatory, dangerous human beings that have ever walked the face of the earth, and the phenomenon might as well not exist. It has no public reality beyond each non-judgmental, race-less, and affectless local news story in which, at best, the race of the perpetrators is only indicated wordlessly in photographs, not in the text, and the crime is treated as a one-time event, not as part of a continuing pattern. [emphasis added]

While Auster is historically inaccurate about the "most savage, primitive, predatory, dangerous human beings that have ever walked the face of the earth" (there have been worse), his sentiments are not misplaced. Black American thugs have developed a particularly vicious and mindless streak in them that only shows a flicker of genius when it comes to torturing their helpless and usually heavily outnumbered prey.

Anonymous said...

Blacks are not in and of themselves a huge threat to free white people. The whites simply disentangle themselves from black contact by separation, segregation or stratification. The problem is when a catalyst is introduced and I think most of us know what that catalyst is.

Van said...

Anon (6/23 9:47 AM) and Zenster:

To further develop the medical analogy, not only is the patient unresponsive to heroic measures, but those measures include constant blood transfusions, bone marrow donations, and organ donations to keep the patient alive. But the patient doesn't become healthy enough to take care of himself, and those making the donations are forced to do so against their will.

Eventually you stop harming the healthy population to keep the patient alive. If not, you kill the healthy population, there is no one left to keep the patient going, and he dies anyway.

We can cut off blacks and save ourselves, or we can all die together.

Anonymous said...

I've had it with these black parasites in the inner cities...out in the country everyone gets along, black and white, but you put a bunch of them together in an apartment complex or in section 8 they start acting like a bunch of animals out of their cages. It's done and over and time to take this nation back from these race baiting assholes.

Mutant Swarm said...

Anonymous said...

Mutant Swarm said...
The current Army/USMC psyops manual is available here in PDF form. Download it, study it, and use it to fight the cultural war


I did download, but its 400? pages and Technical,,, in 1000 words or less, whats it all baout alpha?

June 23, 2012 12:44 PM
_____________________________

I accidentally misled people here; my apologies. I haven't actually finished reading the PDF that is 400+ pages long; I just grabbed it off the internet search results before it vanished. Start with the link to this page, then go back to the PDF. The Freep page is a lot easier to read.

Basically, these two resources are used to conduct a propaganda campaign. They have the added benefit of teaching people how to recognize such a campaign, also.

Anonymous said...

@ Constructive Feedback,...... I just pass on readings I feel may serve the cause. Just google, Dr Manning, Black people are haters and losers. He'll be able to answer better than I could. Should be easy, all you have to do is listen.

Anonymous said...

RE: CF

"...You all are so obsessed with BLACK PEOPLE that you can't see that the GREATER THREAT is the Nancy Pelosi/Ted Kennedy types..."

Why the fuck do these negroes insist on telling us not only how smart they are (I done gradumicated!), but also that we aren't aware of the very things we CONSTANTLY TALK ABOUT?

Liberals are bad?? Really, CF? Seriously? Thank you!!

Another stupid negro. It's really great that you have figured something or other out. But the bottom line is this: We don't care and we don't want anything to do with you. Let that sink in and just go away. Go educate your own kind. We don't need, nor do we want, anything from you and your kollege edumacation (read: 10th grade awareness level)

-Sweep the leg-

Zenster said...

Van: Anon (6/23 9:47 AM) and Zenster:

To further develop the medical analogy, not only is the patient unresponsive to heroic measures, but those measures include constant blood transfusions, bone marrow donations, and organ donations to keep the patient alive. But the patient doesn't become healthy enough to take care of himself, and those making the donations are forced to do so against their will.

Eventually you stop harming the healthy population to keep the patient alive. If not, you kill the healthy population, there is no one left to keep the patient going, and he dies anyway.


Your extension of this medical analogy is superbly instructive and I expect nothing less from a top quality contributor like yourself. BRA is transplanting set after set of healthy lungs and other organs into a hopelessly terminal cancer patient.

The dinosaur-sized fly in this particular jar of social ointment is that the "doctors" involved―namely, ham-fisted budding Social Engineers who are out to reconfigure Western civilization in their vision of "Social Justice"―have handily neglected to swear any part of a Hippocratic oath.

Especially that part about "DO NO HARM"

In fact, White middle class America, and Whites in general, are the exact eggs they intend to break―financially and physically―as they make the dog's breakfast of an omelet they call "utopia".

Whatever reconstructed portion of civilization they ever manage to re-erect will be on our bones.

Dissident said...

Constructive Feedback said:

"You all are so obsessed with BLACK PEOPLE that you can't see that the GREATER THREAT is the Nancy Pelosi/Ted Kennedy types"

While I'll agree with you that they are indeed a threat, because it's their liberal policies that enable much black dysfunction, I'll have to take great exception that they're more the real danger CF. Sorry man, but I'm not likely to be attacked by Ted or Nancy, or Joe Biden or even Obama, but "Obama's sons" are a different story altogether.

I've read enough of your stuff to know that you're an articulate guy, but how in Hell do guys like you always find ways to apologize for clear criminal bahavior? I mean almost 100% of the time black commentors on this blog are in defense of black criminality it seems. Or at least placing the blame squarely on others like Pelosi, evil Republicans, Racist (TM) whites, Gremlins, Aliens, what have you.

When whites screw up I call them out on it, but when blacks play the fool, suddenly I'm E-VIL YT, for cripes sake.

Nothing frosts my cake more than someone that never takes any responsibility FOR THEIR OWN ACTIONS.

Wheeeeeeeew!

Anonymous said...

Bogolyubski

Bravo sir, Bravo!

I like your breakdown and analysis of the "system". I think you're right on.

Anonymous said...

"Let's start with the often-told lie that there are no black serial killers, only whites." - I love this one. I once read an article by a black opinion writer that was something along the lines of, "Why are serial killers always white." Acting as if the white percentage of serial killers somehow diminishes black criminality. What he, and most people that make such stupid comments, ignore is that 22% of serial killers are black. 22% coming from 13% of the population. Blacks are drastically over represented in serial killer stats too.

Anonymous said...

If 12% of our population (the black part) commits 61% of the violent crime in America, IMAGINE the crime rates as the black part approaches 40% of our population and it WILL (if not already) get that high unless something is done.

Mutant Swarm said...

Zenster said...

Anon (6/23, 2012 2:32 PM): Zenster - Giving a link to Free Republic has destroyed your credibility.

Mutant Swarm is the one who originally provided it. The information at the link about propaganda techniques is accurate. That is all I care about. This is the first time I have ever visited the web site and there is no compelling reason to visit it again.
_____________________________

Anonymous, the environment (both in real life and in cyberspace) is neutral. It gives advantage only to those who take advantage.

Mutant Swarm said...

Here's a link for Appendix 1, AFM 33-1, that doesn't lead to Free Republic:

Appendix I: PSYOP Techniques.

Constructive Feedback said...

[quote] Sheila said...
Guys, stop responding to yet another black who claims he has nothing he didn't earn. There's not a black in America under the age of 50 who hasn't benefited, directly or indirectly, from affirmative action, preferential hiring, discriminatory scholarships, and lowered standards.
[/quote]

If Sheila knew how much she sounded like my Black Progressive-Fundamentalist critics - she might be astounded.

They start handing out "English Lessons" when they don't have anything available to materially refute my arguments.

Then she uses the ole trick of: "Paul do you really need to allow these 'Negro thoughts' on this blog that is made for White folks - as one of them who got lucky and passed the 3rd grade thinks he's good enough to look us straight in the eye and debate with us?"

Interesting how YOU are so sure that I am a direct/indirect beneficiary of "Affirmative Action" but, it appears, that you can't bring yourself to make note of any DIRECT OR INDIRECT group favor that you might have amassed over the years.

As I recall - those of you who were blessed with White skin but cursed with ovaries were not allowed to vote or own property upon this nations' founding. I did pass American History, you know. (Another play at pity.)

THIS NEGRO was asked about 8 years ago to call up a government official on behalf of a bidder on a contract in order to play the "Affirmative Action" angle. My BLACK VOICE alone was to make an impression about the diversity of the firm that I contracted my services to.

I told the White male owner of the company (Who made his wife the President of the company so that the firm could be listed as a "Female Owned DBE" ) that I do not transact on my race as such. I refused to make the call under such terms. (Did I make your "Good Negro" list yet, Shelia?)

I told "Mr White Male" (or is it "Mail") that if he wanted me to interact with the prospective client he needed to set up a group call. If the customer had a specific question in the area of my expertise I would be happy to speak on behalf of his company, imparting my subject matter expertise on the technical questions - a role that even a White male on the call would be expected to perform.

Shelia - Just imagine if I was to start viewing myself via the eyes that YOU have affixed upon ME. Do you think that it would be possible for me to keep my sanity as I tried to please you? I don't need you to affirm ANYTHING about ME.

It is stunning to me that with all of the hyperbolic, worst case assumptions of Black people that litter this blog - YOU can't tolerate ONE NEGRO'S VOICE that dares to shatter the bigoted stereotype that you have.

Or is that shadder?
Or is that shater?
Or is that shattr?

Any way YOU are a "Shatter-er"!!

I vow to never get dependent upon people like YOU as much as I refuse to depend upon the forces that the Corrupt Black Progressive Leadership seek to have me worship.

(You do have a point about my run on sentences. I use the "-" to string my thoughts together.

I get the sense, however, that you want to call me "Uppity".

You have paid the same subscription fee to participate on this blog as I did. We both are benefiting from the Affirmative Benevolence of Google Blogger. Your words get stored for free on their hard drives. )

Anonymous said...

I refer to the anti-white Unfair Campaigners as STUPID WHITE PEOPLE.

Enough said.

kas

Zenster said...

Mutant Swarm: Here's a link for Appendix 1, AFM 33-1, that doesn't lead to Free Republic:

Appendix I: PSYOP Techniques.


Bwahahahahaha. Their post for Appendix I is incomplete and the "more" link that they provide at Circle of 13 leads back to the Free Republic article!

Suck it up and stop fussing because you should take good information wherever you can get it.

Bogolyubski said...

CF writes: If I told you that it is my opinion that TED KENNEDY did more damage to "Black Consciousness" than any other elected official in the last 50 years with his Social Justice B.S. - would this let you know that you are mistaken as you look at BLACK ELECTED OFFICIALS and what they think rather than large segments of the Black Community that reject their B.S.?

Teddy Kennedy?? Yes, the old expert pilot of untersee Oldsmobiles was quite destructive, but not half as much as Lyndon Baines Johnson, whose supremely cynical comment while signing the civil rights law was: We'll have those niggers voting for us for the next 100 years! Old LBJ certainly nailed that on the head, no? Blacks would vote for Satan himself in person as long as he had a little "D" next to his name. The Illinois senate race of 2006 was quite illustrative. It was like Henry Ford's choice of color for the Model-T (you can vote for any senator you want as long as he's black) - with the generally decent (and genuinely African-looking) Alan Keyes running against the mulatto John Doe known as Barack Hussein Obama. Care to take a wild guess who the vast majority of blacks voted for?

As for the supposed "large segments of the black community who reject this B.S.", they are rather like unicorns or Republicans in favor of limited government - mythical beasts of fantasy. Blacks vote for the same criminal leaders year after year, decade after decade. Alcee Hastings, who was so completely corrupt and worthless as a Federal judge he actually was impeached and removed from the bench by Congress (which is a great rarity), had no problem at all being elected to Congress in a majority-black district in Florida. Blacks in Sodom-on-Potomac vote for the crackhead Marion Barry over and over again

10mm AUTO said...

Yes, White people built it, but a People have their reign and then they fall. Usually to a Dictator. We dodged a bullet with Obama.

Friends, may I point out that we are deeply lucky that he is such a weak black coward, that his philosophy does not resonate with the masses, that his personality is not forceful and charismatic. He could have, with only a few gifts and a little luck, been another Stalin; the Midwest another Ukraine.

He had all the opportunity and all the legions. The press is with him, some of them fanatically so, as well as nearly 12% of the general population behind him merely for negroiditery and would have followed him into a widespread suppression of the imaginary "White Privilege" like the low I.Q. foot soldiers they are. Imagine 200 D.C. Snipers in 200 different cities. We had a taste with the shootings of the Military personnel at recruitment centers and Fort Hood. Imagine the full weight of the Federal Government Homeland Security backing the Black Panthers and the Nation of Islam. The "flash mobs" would be everywhere and they would do more than simply beat a few isolated Whites.

It was terribly close. All the pieces were in place, we just did not have a chess master of sufficient Ambition.

Thank Odin

Mutant Swarm said...

Zenster wrote:

Mutant Swarm: Here's a link for Appendix 1, AFM 33-1, that doesn't lead to Free Republic:

Appendix I: PSYOP Techniques.

Bwahahahahaha. Their post for Appendix I is incomplete and the "more" link that they provide at Circle of 13 leads back to the Free Republic article!

Suck it up and stop fussing because you should take good information wherever you can get it.

June 23, 2012 8:46 PM
_________________________

I saw that after I posted that link for the Freep-allergic readers. I should have quit while I was ahead.

(Wipes egg off face...)

I agree. Good info, regardless of its source, can and should be used to our advantage.

MuayTyson said...

CF, think of First Aid or CPR. If we don't take care of the immediate and very physical threat first there is no point in the secondary threat.

Let's put it another way blacks are the car wreck and DWL are cancer. Blacks will attack with out provocation and violently so. The DWL are insidious and painful and rot you to the core and no doubt will kill you but slowly and waist you away.

Just my humble opinion.

Anonymous said...

"Here’s a pop quiz: What do we usually call unsubstantiated assumptions about someone’s class, or position in life, based upon the color of their skin?"

Pattern recognition.

Constructive Feedback said...

@ Dissident
You have NEVER heard me argue on behalf of "The Street Pirates". I am "Anti-Street Pirate Sponsored Executions". If the Street Pirate does not kill anyone, we don't need to worry about the "State Sponsored Executions".

You keep looking at the Sharptons of the world to index how Black people think per the antics in the Trayvon Martin case.

I focus on the pack of Black Progressive-Fundamentalists and all of the "Ninjas Who Got Themselves Kilt" but triggered no such response from the Civil Rights Pharisees.

They are "Non-White White Supremacists" in that, for political reasons, they must make the case that the WHITE MAN KILLS BLACK PEOPLE more dead than a BLACK MAN can.

Most of what you all are attributing to RACE is really a combination of:
* Incompetence as expressed via an Ideology (Progressive-Fundamentalism)

* A Psychological disorder as they look to have certain internal phobias against White people filled by those who offer the GOVERNMENT as a solution

* Plain ole FRAUDULENT POLITICS where as a politician you don't care if the voter is unconscious due to DEATH or a steady feeding of "Mushroom-feed" - you know he is going to vote in a manner that is pleasing to you.

I am a Black man who is working to STOP the CORRUPTION in which Black people are used in this corrupt political system. These forces have not developed my people through the institutions that they now dominate. And the leaders are too BIGOTED and CORRUPT to put a stop to the scheme.

Bogolyubski

When I say "Ted Kennedy" I am talking about the "Least Of These" Mindset and a solution set that centrally focuses around Government as a big feeding trough. Both Prez Johnson and Prez Obama are filling this trough with livestock feed. Obama merely wants to entice more Americans from the middle class to take their feeding.

AGAIN you all keep getting hung up on the "Black Welfare Queen" when the grand plan is to get A LARGER CHUCK OF AMERICANS hooked and then VOTING to keep anyone from taking away their feed.

I don't care much about Howard Dean but he was exactly correct in his observations about INCREMENTALISM. Once you get the masses hooked they will start a shooting war if someone tries to take away their entitlements.

To the other posters who believe that I, a Humble Negro, BELIEVE that I am teaching you kind White folks something that you don't already know about this nation's fatal fiscal future.........I don't appraise you by what "You Already Know", instead I observe what you appear to be obsessed with and apply it to MY MODEL of the larger world.

Just as I go after the Black Progressive-Fundamentalist for purposefully avoiding the part of the "model" that is outside of his effort to render an EXTERNAL INDICTMENT, it is clear that many of you are unable to look at the large tidal wave of long term federal (and state/city pension) debt and note that this is going to eventually flood the nation - worse than a whole swarm of Negroes with "Choppers" given to them by Mexicans who got them from the botched "Fast And Furious" program.

i'm all white! how are you? said...

First off i truly miss mr. Charlton Heston! a great white american. and a GOD fearing/loving individual too. i just like to make a couple of points to these idiots at MDU. i'm lucky to be white they said. and i say i am! but not at this time in american history. and what about whites don't get pulled over for being in the wrong neighborhood. well that's just bullshit people. not that long ago i was piulled over two houses down from my home of 37yrs. and when i asked the 2 white cops why i was pulled over the one said "i looked lost" can you believe it. lost, well i know this place like the back of my hand. but the real reason that he couldn't tell me was these blacks that are overwhelming my neighborhood are standing on my old corner and selling drugs. on that same corner as kids we used to play whiffle ball, and football. now these young black kids at the age of 12 are selling pot and cocaine. man how it has changed my neighborhood for the bad. plus ain't it funny that i see no young white kids doing that. and as for these car doors getting locked when these spooks approach! you would be a f-ing fool not too! how about the sign on their face stating whites don't get followed in the super market. i got a suggestion for these coons. smile! ever notice that spooks never smile? they have to come across as hard and so tough!the only 2ways you could get them to smile is 1-pay them, and 2 is to be a white female with no kids clingging to her legs. those whites in that campaign are destroying the white race. as far as i'm concerned they lost their white-ness and everything good about their white race. these ngr lovers should be called out and made to pay for this video! and what i mean by pay is how about dropping them off in some spook ridden project/hood and then they will see how good their white race is. just walk down a street in a white neighborhood you can see the diffrence. man they just don't know. these dam liberals will be the ones that destroy our white race. we can't and we won't let that happen now will we? p.s. fuck michael moore and the 2boats he rode in on. fat bastard. i don't think he has any man parts!

Ivan Shatov said...

Zenster said:

Well worth downloading and thank you for the links, Mutant Swarm. They've already come in handy diagnosing Ivan Shatov's little temper tantrum in the "Psychological Torture" thread.

Hey!! We're allies! Not enemies. Despite some rather egregious intellectual deficiencies, you and I are of similar outlook. And besides, I've always liked high school sophomore cheerleaders!!

Esto vir!

Ivan Shatov said...

Oh, and Zenster, I LIKE you! Imagine how gratuitously offensive I could manage to be were I not to like you.

Loosen up, buddy. I was pulling your chain.

For the record, we have only to consult the annals of history to draw the inescapable conclusion that man is clearly NOT perfectible. More harm has been done by those who entertain this idea than by all others in the course of history.

Esto vir!

Ivan Shatov said...

Bogolyubski said:

Calling us "conservatives" is not very accurate either. There's basically nothing left to 'conserve'. Those who PK (and others) call "Conservatism, Inc." are really DWLs of the second and third categories mentioned above who are engaged in a campaign of deceit. The Republican party, for example, is completely owned by their oligarch masters and operated by them. Rich Lowry of National Review is a perfect exemplar of this type, as are the majority of black "conservatives".

Well said, sir. Reminds me of a quote by R.L. Dabney:

It may be inferred again that the present movement for women’s rights will certainly prevail from the history of its only opponent, Northern conservatism. This is a party which never conserves anything. Its history has been that it demurs to each aggression of the progressive party, and aims to save its credit by a respectable amount of growling, but always acquiesces at last in the innovation. What was the resisted novelty of yesterday is today one of the accepted principles of conservatism; it is now conservative only in affecting to resist the next innovation, which will tomorrow be forced upon its timidity and will be succeeded by some third revolution; to be denounced and then adopted in its turn. American conservatism is merely the shadow that follows Radicalism as it moves forward towards perdition. It remains behind it, but never retards it, and always advances near its leader. This pretended salt bath utterly lost its savor: wherewith shall it be salted? Its impotency is not hard, indeed, to explain. It is worthless because it is the conservatism of expediency only, and not of sturdy principle. It intends to risk nothing serious for the sake of the truth, and has no idea of being guilty of the folly of martyrdom. It always, when about to enter a protest, very blandly informs the wild beast whose path it essays to stop, that its “bark is worse than its bite,” and that it only means to save its manners by enacting its decent role of resistance. The only practical purpose which it now subserves in American politics is to give enough exercise to Radicalism to keep it “in wind,” and to prevent its becoming pursy and lazy from having nothing to whip. No doubt, after a few years, when women’s suffrage shall have become an accomplished fact, conservatism will tacitly admit it into its creed, and thenceforward plume itself upon its wise firmness in opposing with similar weapons the extreme of baby suffrage; and when that too shall have been won, it will be heard declaring that the integrity of the American Constitution requires at least the refusal of suffrage to asses. There it will assume, with great dignity, its final position.

~~R. L. Dabney. “Women’s Rights Women”

Ivan Shatov said...

Zenster,

Agree, the Psy Ops Manual is a very interesting piece of work. I've downloaded it and, of course, it is saved on my hard drive.

Warning: And it cannot be repeated enough, the internet will be shutdown in the not too distant future. The limitless information currently available will be become increasingly harder, and then impossible, to access.

Anonymous said...

I really feel disappointed with some of the comments on this site directed at the black guy who is obviously trying to communicate. I am as fed up as anybody here with PC nonsense like this anti-white ad, and I'm fed up with black crime, but I we shouldn't attack decent people of any color. Even if he might have benefited from relaxed college admissions or some other form of AA, why is that his fault? He didn't make this system. Also--if he took advantage of these programs and made something positive of himself--isn't that good? He is absolutely correct that these aging white hippie liberal types are the just as big a part of the problem as any ghetto thug. I can't stand either, frankly.

And stop dragging gay people into every unrelated thread. Do you know that many real estate agents in California have an "on the cool" motto to "follow the gays?" Why? Because gay people tend to cause no problems, they take care of the properties they buy or rent, and are generally the kind of tenant you want to have. I have never heard of any gay holocaust? Was this some book or theory slithering out of some halfwit gender studies program that virtually no gay people ever go to or read? Reminds me of those "gay activists" that gave the Reagan portrait in the White House the finger! I've never heard of either of them--I never voted for them and certainly find their juvenile nastiness disgusting. They don't represent me or anybody else. What are the qualifications for being an "activist?" There aren't any. They just name themselves that and they are generally unhappy, nasty people. I am not one of those and resent that they pass themselves off as the voice of gay people.

People should love each other, as cheesy as that sounds today. Or at least save the vitriol for those whose actions deserve it. PLEASE.

Zenster said...

Again, Bogolyubski, when you omit all hyperbole, your writing takes on epic proportions. I mean this quite sincerely―as in how very badly SBPDL needs an essay or five, or even if it is just one, based upon your brilliant dissection of White Western civilization's enemies.

Teddy Kennedy?? Yes, the old expert pilot of untersee Oldsmobiles was quite destructive, but not half as much as Lyndon Baines Johnson, whose supremely cynical comment while signing the civil rights law was: We'll have those niggers voting for us for the next 100 years! Old LBJ certainly nailed that on the head, no? Blacks would vote for Satan himself in person as long as he had a little "D" next to his name. [emphasis added]

Be sure to click the link for a hilarious visual. Also, that Johnson quote was the lead-in for Part I of my essay, "The Dis-Integration of America".

As for the supposed "large segments of the black community who reject this B.S.", they are rather like unicorns or Republicans in favor of limited government - mythical beasts of fantasy.

Spot on! Until the GOP supports zero growth of government, they are amnost indistinguishable from the Democratic Party.

Zenster said...

Ivan Shatov: Hey!! We're allies! Not enemies. Despite some rather egregious intellectual deficiencies, you and I are of similar outlook.

Ah, yes. The old―"Gee, for a fat girl you don't sweat much when you dance"―backhanded compliment.

Grow up and accept that there are people who do not find your beliefs to be so incredibly important as you do. There is more than one way of living a productive moral life and if you are unable to accept that without hurling denigrating remarks, it is due to smallness of mind on your part and not of others.

Quite clearly you accept that philosophical abomination known as original sin. Just as clearly, I do not. So get over it.

Zenster said...

Ivan Shatov: Oh, and Zenster, I LIKE you! Imagine how gratuitously offensive I could manage to be were I not to like you.

Your kind of "like" I don't need. Civilized debate is one thing, but your snide personalities are unacceptable. To newcomers, your sort of fractious behavior only lends this site an air of disunity and discord which discourages further participation and any eventual adoption of Race Realism.

Man up and learn how to accept that others may think differently from you.

Zenster said...

Anon (6/23 5:41 PM): Just google, Dr Manning, Black people are haters and losers. He'll be able to answer better than I could.

Probably the best advice that can be given to any Black person, civilized or not.

Zenster said...

kas: I refer to the anti-white Unfair Campaigners as STUPID WHITE PEOPLE.

The problem is that they are not very "stupid". They are just smart enough to be Stalin's "useful idiots". These race traitors are White termites gnawing away at the foundations of Western Civilization and deserve the back of our collective hand and not just being shrugged off as "stupid".

Sheila said...

Anonymous - yes, people should love on another. God also told us to care for our own first, not to look toward the stranger before our own family. Love is not a feeling, though - it's not the warm fuzzies you are urging. Love is an action, and love without morality or judgement is not love. If I profess to "love" all the world's people, then to say I love my own children is meaningless.

If a black male wishes to take advantage of White civilization (the wheel, reading and writing, a modern nation state) then bully for him - yes, we do encourage this - on his own with his own people in his own homeland. Even a pastoralist like Jefferson realized that White and blacks could not live together in the same society. I've gone over this (and over this and over this) before. You want to include, in your future hypothetical society, all people of all races of "good will" and purported ability. Fine. Then you need others of various races for those "good ones" to marry, you have revision to the mean, and you have the innate tension and inequality that will automatically stem from a multicultural society - even one composed of purported smart guys.

Why is the black male here lecturing us? Why is he "seeking dialogue" with us? Why isn't he preaching to his own people and taking care of the log in his own eye before worrying about the mote in ours? It doesn't matter what the setting - blacks follow Whites and carp about White attitudes when we just want to be left alone. That's all - just to be left alone. He may be a fine fellow (although in my experience, every last one, if you try to get beyond social niceties and truly discuss serious issues in an honest fashion, reverts to self pity and anti-White animus), but he's still a black male. If you read his boiler-plate comments, without first oozing White equanimity and self-abasement, you'd see the blatant hostility. He's saying the reason the system is corrupt and things are FUBAR is because of Whites, and the poor blacks are just along for the ride. No responsibility, just self-affirmation and grievances. It's the same old, same old, and I will no longer tolerate it. Just keep reminding yourself, when you read that sort of stuff, "White people don't owe black people anything." Then you can go and love him and his ilk all you like. I'll pass.

10mm AUTO said...

"I really feel disappointed with some of the comments on this site directed at the black guy who is obviously trying to communicate. I am as fed up as anybody here with PC nonsense like this anti-white ad, and I'm fed up with black crime, but I we shouldn't attack decent people of any color. Even if he might have benefited from relaxed college admissions or some other form of AA, why is that his fault? He didn't make this system. Also--if he took advantage of these programs and made something positive of himself--isn't that good? He is absolutely correct that these aging white hippie liberal types are the just as big a part of the problem as any ghetto thug. I can't stand either, frankly."

This is propaganda, an attempt to reduce, dilute and deflect the impact of White awakening. Resist it. It is a variation of IKAGO. Anon, the number of "good blacks" is so small as to be irrelevant and those that are, will make fine additions in their new homeland. Think of their accomplishments! They can lead their people to new heights of black society! This blog is devoted providing informational context to the growing White awakening, not providing a forum for blacks to say "It isn't me!". Blacks trying to steer the conversation, or whiny Whites (WW) like you decrying the "tone" of the blog are merely transparent attempts to shape opinion or induce White guilt. I have no guilt in desiring a White homeland here, or talking about it here. Blacks have the lower half of the Continent of Africa to develop. Their presence here has caused untoward suffering for MY people. Their expulsion is far better than what they would give us if the roles were reversed and we were the 12%. They and their brethren openly advocate for White Genocide, while (WW) like you say, "Can't we all just get along?". Go to a black blog and preach that message, go to WhiteWatch or any of the black blogs and give it a whirl. You and your desire to "just get along" and "love each other" are exactly how we got here in the first place. Negros give nothing and take from Whites all that they can and demand more and beat and kill and rob us for pleasure. To you I say, Go to Hell.

Zenster said...

Mutant Swarm: I just grabbed it off the internet search results before it vanished.

And thank you for doing that. Why people are quibbling about sources (unless it's ridiculously slanted like Wikipedia) is beyond me, especially with such an authoritative work.

I also suggest that everyone go out and buy a terabyte external hard drive. It allows for constant system backups and will hold more data than you could ever hope to store unless you are a professional digital photographer or movie maker. At less than $100.00 it is a vital part of any computing system and, in its un-powered state, acts as the ultimate firewall for your cached information.

Zenster said...

10mm AUTO: It was terribly close. All the pieces were in place, we just did not have a chess master of sufficient Ambition.

It is tempting to chastise you for exaggerating a bit. The problem being that, even if you did not accurately limn out Mein Obama's real game plan, your scenario is a clear reflection of what to expect from the transnational globalist elite.

Those top tier maggots would have absolutely no problem with such a catastrophe as it would serve 90% of their ends.

All the more reason to make sure BHO is turned out of office in November!

Anonymous said...

Blacks offer NOTHING of value to our society. Nothing. We need to stop feeding them.

from VFR:
http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/022668.html
David A. writes:
Apropos your words about crimes by “the most savage, primitive, predatory, dangerous human beings”:

How about some examples from the archives:

1958: “They are afraid to say so in public, but many of the North’s big-city mayors groan in private that their biggest and most worrisome problem is the crime rate among Negroes.” [Time magazine, April 21, 1958]

1961, Newark , New Jersey: “Several hundred Negro youths attacked a handful of police … when officers tried to stop a fight in a schoolyard.” [Kent Steffgen, The Bondage of The Free, Vanguard Books, 1966, p. 202]

1964, New York City : In “a weekend of savagery, marauding groups of Negro youths terrorized whites on four subway trains and a ferry boat. White persons were beaten, robbed, and knifed…. [C]rimes of violence by Negroes have been increasing … A Negro suspect was sought in the murder” of a white school teacher. Four young Negroes raced through a subway train, “knocking down white passengers and smashing windows.” A gang of 30 youths “assaulted white passengers, wrecked seats, and broke light bulbs” on a train at Coney Island. On a ferry boat, “20 young Negroes ran wild, shouting obscenities at white passengers, wrecking a refreshment stand and robbing the woman concessionaire … ” [“New York City in Trouble—Another Chapter”, U.S. News & World Report, June 15, 1964, pp. 43-45]

When a New York City policeman shot a large Negro who lunged at him with a knife, “thousands of Harlem Negroes swarmed out of their homes through the streets, robbing stores, throwing bricks, bottles, and gas bombs, pillaging and attacking bystanders in a bloody full-scale riot … ” [The Bondage of The Free, p. 219]

1964, Rochester, New York: In response to the arrest of a lone, drunk, and disorderly Negro, “a horde of 4000 Negroes tore through 50 downtown city blocks … on a trail of terrorization, robbery, destruction, and personal assault which required the National Guard to restore order. Four white men were killed, over 350 persons were injured (including 35 police officers) … ” [The Bondage of The Free, p. 220]

1964, Washington , D.C. : Thirty-six boys and girls from Maine visiting the Capital “were stoned, manhandled, and jeered by a mob of Negro boys … A 17-year-old girl who fell while trying to escape … was raped by 10 Negro boys. A pack of 25 beat and robbed two women they had come upon in a stalled car … ” [The Bondage of The Free, pp. 220-21]

1965, Philadelphia : Eight Negroes “attacked a 16-year-old white girl on a subway platform and dragged her screaming and fighting down the tracks to rape her. A 23-year-old naval reservist in uniform rushed to help her, was robbed and badly beaten … ” [The Bondage of The Free, p. 221]

1965, New York City : A “gang of Negroes attacked three girls on a New York subway train, hauled them to the floor and tried to rape them. A white boy rushing in to help her was stabbed to death on the scene … ” [The Bondage of The Free, p. 220]

1965, Los Angeles : Irate colored mobs took part gleefully in the Watts riot. “Police told … of a colored youth who had kicked a fallen white motorist in the head so severely on recurrent attacks that by the time he could be driven off, he was slipping from the blood on his shoe … ” [The Bondage of The Free, p. 283]

1969, Michigan : “Forty young Negroes invaded an art show and ran around breaking glass, smashing pottery and sculpture, and ripping paintings from their frames. In one room … every single item was destroyed. Police suspect the rampagers were members of the Flint Junior College Black Student Union … ” [National Review, May 20, 1969, p. 470]

Anonymous said...

"I really feel disappointed with some of the comments on this site directed at the black guy who is obviously trying to communicate"

Ditto.

Whether you agree with him or not, Constructive Feedback is the POLAR OPPOSITE of the typical-Sharpton-Jackson-Obama-blame-whitey negro mentality. For fuck's sake people, take a look at his blog sometime, he's from the Thomas Sowell/Larry Elder/Clarence Thomas school of black intellectuals, he addresses HONESTLY dysfunction within the black community, and does NOT blame everything on white racism.

Zenster said...

Sheila: Love is not a feeling, though - it's not the warm fuzzies you are urging. Love is an action, and love without morality or judgement is not love.

Spot on, Sheila! Love―just like respect, honor and worth―is earned. It is not something that is given away freely. At least not without demeaning and, eventually, disgracing the entire concept.

If I profess to "love" all the world's people, then to say I love my own children is meaningless.

Again, bravo! When love is dispensed so indiscriminately it is nothing but promiscuity. This is the rotten core of modern Christianity's Universalism. To blithely confer all of Western civilization's blessings upon those who did nothing to construct that world and, what's more, actively seek to destroy it is an act of TREASON.

This treachery, carried out on the name of "tolerance" and "diversity" is an abject betrayal of everything Christ ever stood for and is so immoral as to defy description.

Why is the black male here lecturing us? Why is he "seeking dialogue" with us? Why isn't he preaching to his own people and taking care of the log in his own eye before worrying about the mote in ours?

All good questions and I wonder just exactly where this chap stands with respect to Reverend Doctor James David Manning.

BobC said...

I am the guy who wrote the post about people loving each other.

I am hardly advocating any "warm and fuzzy" anything--I hate that crap. I was simply saying that Constructive Feedback is a black person who seems to be of good character, who is trying to communicate with whites, and I think he shouldn't be viciously attacked.What I got out of his posts was that even if black people disappeared tomorrow--you'd still have the Nancy Pelosis and the Barney Franks of this world, who remain the biggest threats to this nation. Just the fact that Pelosi told us commoners that we would have to wait until Obama's healthcare bill was passed to learn what's in it should tell you how far her head is away from the fundamentals of democracy and towards fascism. I would rather deal with Sharpton--at least he's honest about his intentions and you can deal with it. And Sharpton has no power--Pelosi does.

I have known many fine black people and many fine Latinos--but that doesn't mean I am not seeing a very serious and ugly tide rising amongst ghetto blacks. You'd have to be an idiot not to see it. In the past few months I have personally physically intervened in instances where black thugs have been threatening an older black man, and an older homeless white man.
But that's sort of the problem isn't it? Most whites don't intervene, they don't speak up--they take the defensive almost every single time. At work I am surrounded with white liberals who would piss their pants in a black neighborhood at night, but feel the need to lecture other white people about how racist they are. I am quite vocal in stating that I love my people--WHITE PEOPLE--and will not tolerate the incessant white bashing that white liberals do. They back down. They seem baffled by a white man saying he loves his people--mostly because they never hear anyone saying it. I can't tell you how many white co-workers come meekly into my office, after one of my confrontations, telling me they agreed with me and were happy I had a spine.

Standing up for yourself is EASY--Western Europeans have so much to be proud of. We have created amazing civilizations, great art, medicines that have saved half the world. What the hell do we have to feel guilt over? Ending the African slave trade? Curing polio?

Did you all ever know a really beautiful girl in high school that went around telling people how ugly she was--which was satisfying for her because one, she knew it wasn't true, and two, it got her attention? That's white liberals today. They preen, they want to take responsibility for the failures of others, and they are filled with phony humility.
BobC

Zenster said...

10mm AUTO: I have no guilt in desiring a White homeland here, or talking about it here. Blacks have the lower half of the Continent of Africa to develop. Their presence here has caused untoward suffering for MY people. Their expulsion is far better than what they would give us if the roles were reversed and we were the 12%. They and their brethren openly advocate for White Genocide, while (WW) like you say, "Can't we all just get along?". [emphasis added]

Outstanding point, 10mm AUTO and an overall great comment in general! If anyone wants to see what being that "12%" minority White population would be like, just take a look at today's South Africa. Screw any notion of reconciliation, there is none to be had with Blacks who, for the most part, only want revenge and a free hand to loot White Western civilization.

If there was even a remote possibility of reconciliation, American Blacks would long ago have stormed all of the Nation of Islam temples, cracked every skull inside, and then burned every one of them down to the ground. Instead, there is only thundering silence from Black America, if not vigorous applause, as Farrahkhan and his minions continue to spew their bilious and disgusting genocidal horse manure.

Detroit, Baltimore and Atlanta are all stark testimony to just how utterly incompatible Blacks are with civilization in general. This now makes 130 similarities I have found between Blacks and Muslims:

Both are totally immiscible with Western civilization.

Zenster said...

Anon: Blacks offer NOTHING of value to our society. Nothing. We need to stop feeding them.

from VFR:

David A. writes:
Apropos your words about crimes by “the most savage, primitive, predatory, dangerous human beings”:

How about some examples from the archives:


You omitted Auster's reply to David A. which reflects a dubious ability to fully plumb how evil Blacks continue to be.

LA replies: While these incidents are worth referencing, I would say that they are not the most apropos, because they all come from one particular period of extraordinary race riots between 1964 and 1969, beginning immediately after the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Therefore they are not necessarily representative of a norm of Negro behavior. [emphasis added]

I have a deep respect for Auster's rare ability to simultaneously perceive the threats of both Islam and TNB. However, I feel he is quite mistaken in writing off that half decade of high-level TNB as any sort of anomaly.

For one thing, Auster is just as likely as any of us to have been deprived of accurate reporting about Black crime. The amount and quantity of it is like the abuse of dissidents in the USSR, buried under a mountain of smothering propaganda.

My wager is that the 1960s use of National Guardsmen to police riots subconsciously taught Blacks to pursue a course of dispersed low-intensity conflict that never quite manages to appear like the outright war that it really is. It's akin to the Arab-Israeli conflict. The "Palestinians" always keep the pot from boiling over to where the Israelis would finally be justified in expelling all "Palestinians" into the Sinai and Jordan.

At some unconscious level, Blacks know that some serious smackdown awaits any major TNB. This is why they use flash robs and random attacks like Knock Out King to inflict their death of a thousand cuts.

Of course, just like with Islamic terrorists, none of this will prevent some stupid @ss Black thug from eventually torching a fully attended kindergarten or some similar sort of atrocity that will finally unleash the lynch mobs. Already, selective law enforcement and softened judicial treatment of Blacks is precipitating vigilantism. The return of lynching is just a matter of time and sufficient outrage on the part of Whites.

Zenster said...

Anon (6/24 10:54 AM): For fuck's sake people, take a look at his blog sometime, he's from the Thomas Sowell/Larry Elder/Clarence Thomas school of black intellectuals, he addresses HONESTLY dysfunction within the black community, and does NOT blame everything on white racism.

Who fucking cares?!? We honestly address TNB right here at SBPDL and do not have to tolerate any soft peddling or refusal to accept full responsibility.

Decent Blacks are so few in number as to be negligible.

Call it "sad", "unfortunate" or whatever the hell you want but it doesn't change the fact that Blacks are a gigantic millstone around the neck of White America. Hell, if they were just a dead weight it wouldn't be so bad but, instead, we're supposed to turn a blind eye to all the rapes and murders like they are just some unfortunate random events or, worse yet, "robberies gone wrong". What a damned smokescreen that latest bit of reportorial manure is.

As Van has asked time and again; what goods, services, labor or other products are there that Blacks provide which cannot be gotten elsewhere without the under-performing, sullen, hostile attitude and risk of physical attack that too frequently accompanies being anywhere near Blacks?????

The answer is not a damned thing. NOTHING. Just like how White America owes Black America NOTHING.

End of story.

Californian said...

Mutant Swarm, thanks for posting the PSYOP manual. People need to educate themselves about the methods of modern warfare, and PSYOP, or "infowar" as it is now generally known, is a major weapon.

I have one acquaintance, an anti-PC activist, who takes community college courses in media and PR in order to refine his skills in communications. There's a lot of stuff out there which is useful.

Californian said...

Few people dare say that the "cultural war" is really a racial war, an attempt to permanently subjugate white people into a form of financial servitude ...

Summed up nicely.

I'm reminded of the quote usually attributed to Trotsky: "You may not be interested in war, but war is interested in you." The thing is, the current situation is a war which most white people would prefer to avoid since it could get ugly. Mighty ugly.

But if someone is trying to exterminate/subjugate you, what else can one do but fight back--or surrender?

It seems, though, that DWLs -- especially their conservative wing -- do not want to fight. Might not look good on the resume when applying for that Fortune 500 job or Beltway social club. So they refuse to recognize the threat and rationalize away every attack upon themselves, their children, and civilization.

Each defeat for white people -- in Rhodesia-South Africa, the London rioting, your local university -- is translated via the alchemy of DWL ideology as a step forward for universal justice, equality, and progress into the future. Think of it as a civilization wide Stockholm Syndrome.

Supposing DWLs were to wake up one morning and view things as they really are. What would they see? That they have abandoned entire continents once dominated by the Western world. That they have opened their own frontiers to the third world. That they have surrendered every institution of the Western world. Rather than facing this reality, it is far easier to immerse oneself in the delusion that the world is liberating itself of something called "racism" and thus the future is so bright, you're gonna need shades.

It is my contention that liberalism in its current form is not simply an ideology, but a pathology. It is a mental state which has somehow afflicted many if not most denizens of the Western world. This is one reason that rational argument does not work against DWLs.

So how does one restore sanity?

Anonymous said...

Whether you agree with him or not, Constructive Feedback is the POLAR OPPOSITE of the typical-Sharpton-Jackson-Obama-blame-whitey negro mentality.

A useful PSYOP tactic is to capitalize on the other side's divisions. If there are blacks who are not towing the DWL party line, then an alliance with them might be useful.

Race Realists lack the political strength these days to win on their own. Insisting on some kind of ideological purity which allows only white people to criticize the system is not a good tactic. Alienating potential allies might force them into the opposing camp.

There might be a broader alliance to bring down "PC," which could include men's rights activists, paleocons, anti-immigration groups, militia folks, gun owners, and even old line civil libertarians who oppose speech codes, and a host of others.

Read the PSYOP manual posted here and develop tactics which can win.

Remember the ancient wisdom: "Divide and conquer."

Anonymous said...

RED ALERT--RED ALERT

EU should 'undermine national homogeneity' says UN migration chief

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-18519395

Anonymous said...

Tech9 said:

CF - I really don't know why you're on this blog.

I grew up in a small town that was 99% white. We never locked our doors or our cars.

Now fast forward to 2012 where most major cities are non-white. Whitey is not safe in the big city. You either need to be armed or trained in self defense.

Your tribe never plays fair. When your black yoofs attacks whites, they always attack in packs. They're cowards.

Here's the thing CF, I could give two shits about blacks, your blog and black needs.

Could care less.

I don't do business with blacks, don't have black friends and would not be upset if I never ever saw another black face again.

Am I a racist?

Yes.

So what?

You stay in your neighborhood and I'll stay in mine.

Tell your honor students to stay away from our women.

Sheila said...

Divide and conquer is all fine and well - but the enemy of my enemy is not my friend - particularly where diversity is concerned.

Bogolyubski said...

Zenster: I have a deep respect for Auster's rare ability to simultaneously perceive the threats of both Islam and TNB. However, I feel he is quite mistaken in writing off that half decade of high-level TNB as any sort of anomaly.

For one thing, Auster is just as likely as any of us to have been deprived of accurate reporting about Black crime. The amount and quantity of it is like the abuse of dissidents in the USSR, buried under a mountain of smothering propaganda.


I suspect you're correct here, Zenster. Keep in mind that the Ministry of Truth propaganda campaign to cover up black violence has been under way since at least 1946. That's a full two decades before the period Auster refers to. There's considerable evidence that TNB has not really changed in nature over the past four centuries. Read up on the Nat Turner rebellion sometime. It's easily as gruesome as anything in Clark Howard's Zebra. It was so completely abominable that the whites of the time (1830s) actually showed remarkable restraint. They would have been quite justified in completely depopulating the region of all blacks by fire and sword, which certainly would have been the response of the Arab slave-owners and their minions in the wake of that type of a chimpout over in the Ummah. Read Margaret Mitchell's book Gone with the Wind sometime. There is a reason that Gen. Forrest and others formed the KKK - and it wasn't about being sore over losing the civil war.

There is some evidence that black behavior was actually improving somewhat in the early decades of the 20th century. The black marriage rate then was considerably higher then than that of whites at present. The late Elizabeth Wright wrote some on that era, along with a Thomas Sowell and a couple of others. The fatal error was the choice to follow the communist W.E.B. Dubois instead of the Christian traditionalist Booker T. Washington.

Anonymous said...

http://abclocal.go.com/wabc/story?section=news/local/new_york&id=8711962

Black punches white bus driver who ends up in coma then dies.

FSR said...

I have been having a great time carpet bombing HateFact comments these white-guilt "progressives" who wrote this article about the "UnFair Campaign", please come join the fun!

http://www.xojane.com/issues/the-unfair-campaign-white-privilege?utm_medium=facebook

xojane.com

Fellow White People: I Assure You This Anti-Racist Campaign Video is Not Trying to Make You Feel Guilty

by Lesley Kinzel

Jun 22, 2012 at 4:00pm

[a bunch of naive reality-ignoring white-guilt pap follows]...

Van said...

10mm & Zenster: "Outstanding point, 10mm AUTO and an overall great comment in general! If anyone wants to see what being that "12%" minority White population would be like, just take a look at today's South Africa. Screw any notion of reconciliation, there is none to be had with Blacks who, for the most part, only want revenge and a free hand to loot White Western civilization."

Human history is the story if various populations fighting for control of resources - land, water, women; or today jobs, wealth, cities. That blacks continue this fight is no surprise, what's amazing is that most whites have stopped.

Whites have been so overwhelmingly successful at world domination that they have actually stopped competing with other groups, and decided to include all other populations in their societies. But the other groups aren't playing by these rules; they don't honor the truce. Perhaps blacks aren't even aware of what they are doing, it is so ingrained in human behavior, likely evolving early in the development of mammals. The behavior is seen in every social animal, and is well documented in wolf packs, chimpanzee clans, etc.

Blacks don't want white police officers, or even black police officers actin on authority from the white power structure arresting black criminals - even when other blacks are the victims. They don't want this any more than we would accept UN forces coming in and arresting white criminals.

They attempt to gain control of any city council they can, any mayor's office, and will hold onto it even if it means re-electing a corrupt and/or incompetent black over a white. Black students must be taught by black teachers in schools with black principals and systems with black superintendents - all paid for by the nearby white taxpayers, of course.

And of course, all along we have the low-grade war of black-on-white violence. Constant attacks; typically the hit-and-run tactics used by an army that is outmatched numerically. With the election of His O-ness, the soldiers in the field felt they had essentially won; they had gained control of the ultimate seat of power. So the attacks have escalated and become more brazen.

With Romney's (likely landslide) victory, the war will move into the open.
-------
Follow-up to my off topic post from several weeks ago. I saw the visitors to my neighborhood a couple more times, then one weekend several cars were broken into. Shockingly (sarcasm, of course), they weekend cruisings stopped that very same weekend. Our cars weren't hit, and I did have a fun "see, I told you" moment with the wife. So it wasn't a total loss.

Zenster said...

Bogolyubski: Read up on the Nat Turner rebellion sometime. It's easily as gruesome as anything in Clark Howard's Zebra. It was so completely abominable that the whites of the time (1830s) actually showed remarkable restraint. They would have been quite justified in completely depopulating the region of all blacks by fire and sword, which certainly would have been the response of the Arab slave-owners and their minions in the wake of that type of a chimpout over in the Ummah.

But … but … but we all know that Islam is the Religion of Peace [spit] and White man is the ultimate evil in this world. What are you trying to say?

[/sarc]

RobertB said...

FSR--

I m Frank Thecrank. I hope you enjoy my comments there--if they stay for any length of time.

RobertB said...

Sorry I'm late to the party. I just want to say that I put most of this down to the elaborate plan hatched by Communists in the 1930's when they gave up on a white proletarian revolt here and in Western Europe.

Sometime I will write about my experiences in dealing with Hippie Communists as a child--a mere 12 years of age. But for now, read this. I found on Nicholas Stix website and it is from whence those late 50's, early 60's black on white crimes came from. Also, please note that in Rochester NY, the intended victims were Jews.

https://sites.google.com/site/heavenlybanner/its-very-simple-the-true-story-of-civil-rights

Enjoy and be very, very afraid of how far they have progressed.

nikcrit said...

Too funny:

All these radical autonimists and free-speech advocates here, and what happens at their blog?
O
ne civil, non-flaming dissenting commenter ----- and they block his comments, while allowing his slander by others.

Stockholm syndrome writ large, I guess.

Anonymous said...

People are people . And there are many facets of character a person can own. If you understand this ideology you will broaden your perspective. This ideology will help prevent you from being "Sanduskied". this is the way of life in a nutshell. Take heed and your odds of survival increase. Signed ......Experience,...... the BEST teacher hands down.

Anonymous said...

When? Where? What?

Zenster said...

Van: Whites have been so overwhelmingly successful at world domination that they have actually stopped competing with other groups, and decided to include all other populations in their societies.

This is largely true but the underlying causative factors are exceedingly complex.

On the one hand, it appears as though this current generation's, and several past ones', towering sense of entitlement has morphed into a feeling of invulnerability. It is as if no amount of meddling with or gaming of The System™ can possibly bring it down. Especially not now that Mein Obama has ushered in an era of unprecedented Big Government™. You can also rest assured that the Nanny State is doing absolutely nothing to disabuse anyone of this notion. They are the end all and be all of Big Government™ that brooks no difference of opinion.

None of this is helped by the way that Republicans have fallen in love with growing the government like any of the very worst died-in-the-wool Liberals.

Much of this sense of invulnerability can be attributed to how some handful of generations have grown up amidst heretofore unknown prosperity, wealth, security and employment. Few are able or even willing to recognize how these benisons were the byproduct of millions who made the ultimate sacrifice in World War II. Put tersely, they have no idea that freedom isn't free.

This same sense of invulnerability is mirrored in mega-corporations and their "too big to fail" mentality. F&%k knows that our bought-and-sold whores of politicians have done nothing to disabuse them of that misconception. It also manifests as a complacency about the routine failure of so-called "mega-mergers". A great example being Quaker Oats' $1.7 billion buyout of Snapple.

At the loss of almost $2 million per day (almost $3 million in today's money), where was any shareholder outcry much less a display of embarrassment or personal responsibility by executives over such monumental corporate blundering? So it is that this sense of invulnerability has transmuted into being impervious to feelings of shame or humiliation. Just so long as these elitist bastards can continue to fart through silk, we proles can all eat sh!t.

Of course, the 1997 Quaker Oats fiasco has long been been eclipsed by such colossi as Bernard Madoff's $50 billion Ponzi scheme and, lately, the $130 billion sovereign default of Greece. Again, the curious and deafening silence of Conservatives and Liberals alike over this horrendous malfeasance bespeaks an inappropriate whistling-past-the-graveyard nonchalance about the gradual but steady destabilization of Western civilization.

Follow-up to my off topic post from several weeks ago. I saw the visitors to my neighborhood a couple more times, then one weekend several cars were broken into. Shockingly (sarcasm, of course), their weekend cruisings stopped that very same weekend. Our cars weren't hit, and I did have a fun "see, I told you" moment with the wife. So it wasn't a total loss.

Van, you have my official permission to laugh and point.

Anonymous said...

You're forgetting one thing. Duluth is way North. I've noticed a correlation between how far North you are and how much you love the darker races.

In short, they're removed from the reality and so they idealize "the noble savage".

It's no coincidence that these Northern bleeding hearts were mainly the ones who were human shields during the bombing of Saddam Hussein. They came from Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Holland, and other places with long winters.

You'll see them flock to Haiti as volunteers; smile for photo-ops in Zambian villages; rush down to Dixie for Civil Rights a la 1962; and other "do good" acts. Acts where they're probably not needed or wanted.

It's so easy to bleed your heart over "The Gentle Negro" when you're far removed from most of them. The one or two Blacks that are around, then, are put on a pedestal, pampered, and kowtowed to.

It's the Northern Way.

Anonymous said...

Stereotypes save lives.

Bogolyubski said...

Don't know how many of you may have seen it already, but Auster's response to the Duluth Douchebags is absolutely out of the park. PK, this one is so good it might even be worth a re-post over here.

Ray Scissom said...

Unfair? What's really unfair is that black people aren't even capable of supporting the shitty existence that they have now without us paying the tab. Want things to get better? Get off your lazy, black asses and make it better.

Van said...

nikcrit: "Too funny:

All these radical autonimists and free-speech advocates here, and what happens at their blog?"

Blocking one's comments on a blog (assuming that has happened) does not violate said commentator's right to free speech. The speaker is still free to comment on other blogs/websites, and even speak his mind on his own blog - his voice is not silenced.

Blocking a comment is in no way comparable to the repercussions that one would face for publicly voicing the opinions expressed here - likely termination of employment, possible physical assault (which could go unprocecuted due to the "hate speech" justifying the assault), and (realistic if not likely) political prosecution.

In the UK, a woman who dared point out the high crime of immigrant groups has been ruled insane. A child protective services agency is planning to kidnap the child (as soon as it is born) of a member of a nationalist political party.

Here in the US, and especially in the UK, these are the actions of those who violate freedom of speech. Your comparison of such to being blocked from commenting on a blog is idiotic.

This will be my one response. I won't participate in the "everyone pay attention to nickrit" routine that destroyed Guy White's blog.

Anonymous said...

I am from Minnesota and have lived through enough Kulturkampf to assess this latest trickery. Much of the mindset of the Kampfists is immured in Evangelical Lutheranism's "Outreachism" for lack of a better word.These people think the the strength of the hold of Christianity is best measured by the numbers in the pews Sunday after Sunday and not by the general level of morality observed and displayed by the population day in and day out. Consequently, when Evangelicals talk about the decline of Christianity they inevitably also talk about the growth of Evangelical Christianity in the former redoubt of Roman Catholicism, South America, and in the continent of Africa. Since there are more people in the pews in these places, they are more "Christian" and thus more deserving of praise and concern, and concversely we who are not them are worthy of criticism simply because we are not them. Notice how this thinking is circular and antiscientific ( dare I say uncivilized ) inasmuch as evidence of superior morality of non-whites is specifically excluded in the judgement that they are, indeed, more advanced and deserving of emulation.
In other words, prove you are not racist. In the meantime we think you are, whitey.

Sheila said...

Well said, Van. He's also pretty much destroyed OneSTDV's blog too - the posts are readable, but once nikcrit gets hold of the comment thread, it's worthless. Of course, that's exactly what the other black guy, CF, is trying to do here.

My husband and I have been making a list of words/terms that the left (particularly blacks and gays) have destroyed that we wish to excise from modern English. So far, those I can remember off the top of my head include:

folk
community
diversity
fairness
dialogue
color
justice
equality
opportunity
workshop
gay
queer
partner

I know there are many more. Add your own, and come up with substitutes that have concrete meaning (until those, too, are changed by the Ministry of Truth).

Kylie said...

Bogolyubski said...

"Teddy Kennedy?? Yes, the old expert pilot of untersee Oldsmobiles"

LOL! That's every bit as inspired as "obsolete farm equipment".

Brilliant and witty. You really are a treasure.

Kylie said...

Sheila said, "My husband and I have been making a list of words/terms that the left (particularly blacks and gays) have destroyed that we wish to excise from modern English. So far, those I can remember off the top of my head include:

folk
community
diversity
fairness
dialogue
color
justice
equality
opportunity
workshop
gay
queer
partner"


Off the top of my head, let me add:
celebrate
embrace
vibrant
victim
privilege
wrongs (n.)
outreach
alternative
social
rights (n.)
empowerment
historical
inclusion
exclusion
relevant
teachable
harassment

Anonymous said...

I like that. "Maximum effort". This blogger is hilarious. Very entertaining I must say.

Anonymous said...

They need constant attention. Like small children do. If you want for it to end, you must block them completely. It is the only way. They live in a state of grievance.

nikcrit said...

"Well said, Van. He's also pretty much destroyed OneSTDV's blog too - the posts are readable, but once nikcrit gets hold of the comment thread, it's worthless. Of course, that's exactly what the other black guy, CF, is trying to do here."

Translation: I can't reasonably argue or debate him, so I'll just censor him, because I don't like his views."

Which is fine: As I've said,bonding-n-venting, piss-n-vinegar blogs serve a purpose ------ but reasoned and judicious debate isn't one of them.

So, if the verdict's in, and SBPDL.com is a piss-n-vinegar blog, I won't waste your or my time, and I'll just let you get back to business and resume the nonstop volley of rants and jigaboo jokes.....Also, I really don't want to participate at blogs where respectful opposition isn't wanted and the blog host selectively censors the debate.

Van, I'm sorry to hear your position on this; I thought you were a more conscientious debater.
Ironically, it was with you I had one of my first race blog debates, and which got me interested in this particular form of give-n-take, remember?

http://onestdv.blogspot.com/2011/09/rick-perry-on-immigration.html

Anonymous said...

I'm sorry but what is the "Muslim" problem ? I'd prefer an answer from a gentile.

Van said...

"Van, I'm sorry to hear your position on this; I thought you were a more conscientious debater.
Ironically, it was with you I had one of my first race blog debates, and which got me interested in this particular form of give-n-take, remember?"

OK, I'll bite.

Eventually, there is no point having the same conversation over and over again - with the same person or with multiple people. There is nothing you can say that hasn't been covered repeatedly. Familiarize yourself with "The Question" (Zenster mentions it above); its why there really should be no negotiation between blacks and whites. Blacks benefit from being with whites, while white societies suffer from the presence of blacks. When one side desperately needs the other, yet has nothing of value to offer, there is no negotiation. Any honest assessment of black-white relations should reach that conclusion, and blacks should be thankful for the opportunity to live among whites. For me, after a ten year process of turning from an anti-white/anti-racist liberal into a race realist, the debate is over.

I don't waste time arguing with Flat Earthers, I don't waste time arguing with Racial Creationists, and I don't waste time debating blacks on racial topics. When I chose to do so, it is more for the benefit of others following along, to poke holes in the flawed arguments of racial egalitarians and diversity promoters, so they can continue the process of questioning the current accepted (and obviously false) orthodoxy on race.

I'm no more interested in "give and take" than Galileo and Copernicus would be in debating the position of the Sun relative to the Earth with a modern Terracentric. Sometimes, the issue is settled; only the ideological loser wishes to continue the discussion.

Van said...

And for the record, some time in 2011 on OneSTDV would not have been one of your "first" race-blog debates. You were commenting on Guy White for at least a year, possibly two, prior to that.

Your appeal to sentimentality has failed.

Anonymous said...

what is the "Muslim" problem ? I'd prefer an answer from a gentile.

See Gates of Vienna and Jihad Watch.

nikcrit said...

"And for the record, some time in 2011 on OneSTDV would not have been one of your "first" race-blog debates. You were commenting on Guy White for at least a year, possibly two, prior to that."

Yes, technically I should've made clear it was 'my first debate at OneSTDV"; I had done as much at Guy White, but there rarely was that much sustained back-n-forth, a la the thred I cited w you and I at OneSTDV last fall. FWIW, I gained lost of insights and expanded view from such debates....btw, one more thing: it's sort-of funny that you say I 'ruined' Guy White, when in fact, I'd argue that I generated lots of pro-whiters into debate who'd otherwise not have gone there; I even got co-blogger access accorded to me, so I could do occasional guest threads there.
That's probably proof to me of its downfall, but I maintain what I said repeatedly: there's a place for 'white-only' bonding-n-venting pro-white blogs, as well as a place for open-debate race blogs that welcomes input from anyone.
And I can't resist one final caveat: to the anonymous commenter in the last thred who claims that I and other NAM commenters are ostracized from 'real blacks': please tell that to the tens of thousands of 'real black' kids I see nine months each year in my +65% public school district that I work in@! (lol!)
--030---

Zenster said...

Auster makes a grand slam in his article about the Duluth Unfair Campaign (hat tip: Bogolyubski):

However, on an even deeper though unconscious level, what these quintessentially white-liberal, anti-white videos and billboards are saying is that whites really are superior—inherently superior—to other races, particularly to blacks, in intelligence, in looks, in the fineness of their vibrations, in every way; and since any inequality is unfair, it is unfair to be white. Therefore whites must in perpetuity impose unearned withering moral censure and material disadvantages on themselves, including allowing themselves to be terrorized and murdered by blacks, while bestowing unearned effusive moral approval and material advantages on nonwhites, particularly blacks, in an endless but never successful effort to cancel out the hideous unfairness of being white. [emphasis added]

Auster also goes on to note how these anti-White movements may be the last straw in terms of herding even relatively unwilling people over into the Race Realism camp.

If liberals keep indicting all non-liberal whites as racists in need of totalitarian reconstruction, conservatives may be propelled, even against their own desires, but simply as a matter of survival, to become what I have always hoped they would become: moral racialists. And if they can’t relate to the term moral racialist, here’s another label that may, at some point, become acceptable to them: racial conservative.

Zenster said...

Anon (6/25 3:14 PM): I'm sorry but what is the "Muslim" problem ?

You would be much better off phrasing your question as follows:

What isn't problematic about Muslims.

That question has a much shorter and concise answer:

NOTHING

Islam is the anthesis of Western civilization. The two cannot coexist together nor can either one bear the presence of the other without an eventual holocaust or genocide being precipitated.

Islam's ultimate vision of a worldwide caliphate amounts to Global Cultural Genocide™.

Sheila said...

Once again, Van, you hit it out of the park. Thank you, thank you, for saying so well what I've been trying (and failing) to get across:

"Eventually, there is no point having the same conversation over and over again - with the same person or with multiple people. There is nothing you can say that hasn't been covered repeatedly. . . When one side desperately needs the other, yet has nothing of value to offer, there is no negotiation. . . For me . . . the debate is over."

"I don't waste time arguing with Flat Earthers, I don't waste time arguing with Racial Creationists, and I don't waste time debating blacks on racial topics. . .
I'm no more interested in "give and take" . . . Sometimes, the issue is settled; only the ideological loser wishes to continue the discussion."

Perfectly rational, lucid, and simple. Thank you again for providing the only response a poster like nikcrit or constructive feedback should require.

Van said...

Thanks, Sheila.
---------
Nikrit:

What the heck. "Ruined" Guy White is subjective. I recall many commenters getting frustrated with what became repetitive conversations with you. I always thought you seemed like a nice guy, but shared the opinion that sometimes conversations were like re-inventing the wheel (with a different participant each time). I think you were playing a little game with people, sort of a feigned innocent/ignorance routine, hoping to pull a little Andy Griffith/Matlock "aw shucks" nice guy persona while steering the conversation in directions you found comfortable.

As for our initial conversation on this thread, I don't care of you comment or not, or if others engage you. I'm simply not in the mood to rehash the basics of HBD, or the overall (negative) impact of blacks on Western Civilization - the verdict is in. My point was to call you out for the very false equivalency you made on potentially blocking comments on a blog and violations of free speech. Quite ridiculous.

If you wish to contribute to the discussion here, without being considered annoying, you'll have to do the following:

Concede that there are innate, genetic differences in the various human races/populations; including in intelligence, social organization, and propensity towards violence.

Acknowledge that blacks benefit greatly from inclusion in white society, while having nothing of value to offer that is unobtainable from others, and while also providing levels of crime and taxpayer dependency not seen in other populations. In other words, blacks are a net loss on US society.

Do the above, and feel free to post your thoughts on fair and effective solutions, because that's where the conversation is here.

Van said...

By the way,

I seem to write in a somewhat blunt style. Animosity is not necessarily intended, although it seems to come out.

Baloo said...

A reply of sorts in graphic form:
http://ex-army.blogspot.com/2012/06/white-privilege-part-ii.html

Sheila said...

"Anonymous said...
I'm sorry but what is the "Muslim" problem ? I'd prefer an answer from a gentile."

Anonymous - Christian of Jewish genetic background here, but I strongly differ with the other posters who responded to your inquiry. Gates of Vienna and Jihad Watch have pronounced, pro-Israeli and Jewish biases. That's not to say they don't catalogue Muslim crimes or aggressive anti-Christian activities, but they don't really address the core of the problem - they're more concerned with Jews' problems with Muslims than they are with White Americans' problems with Muslims. Actually, they see the two as one and the same. At the other end of the spectrum, some White Nationalist sites (such as Occidental Observer) seem to take the position that "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" and go full-on pro-Arab in their anti-Jewish animus. Fully their prerogative, but again, they have their own bias. Personally, I don't identify with either the Jews or the Palestinians.

The issue with Muslims (I'm speaking of Muslim immigrants, here) is that they are non-Whites in a White society. In this one case, although I rarely quote Lawrence Auster (exceedingly high self-esteem and exceptionally pro-Jewish), he gets the main point here: "It’s a matter of seeing that Muslims in significant numbers do not belong among us, should not have been allowed in, and should leave.
That’s what we have to do with Muslims in the West. They don’t belong here. They belong in their home, not in our home."

Muslim culture is, in its native land, both fascinating (food and costume and architecture) and repulsive (FGM and Sharia law) and intrinsically alien to Western, White society. It's interesting to study and even visit. Bringing it wholesale to graft onto our culture results not in a workable hybrid, however, but the death of the original. Muslims, like blacks, Asians, and even Jews, are not White Christian Europeans. That's the crux of the problem.

Paul - I know you respect Auster. I regularly read him, too, but believe his biases are a real weakness. If you must, edit my comment (and indicate you have done so) but please post my response. I read Gates of Vienna and respect its content, but its biases are also real. I realize you have stated repeatedly that this site is SBPDL all the time, but I didn't raise the Muslim subject, and believe the responses you printed so far are one-sided.

Many thanks.

nikcrit said...

"As for our initial conversation on this thread, I don't care of you comment or not, or if others engage you. I'm simply not in the mood to rehash the basics of HBD, or the overall (negative) impact of blacks on Western Civilization - the verdict is in."

I conceded the core tenets of HBD back at Guy White and have reiterated them repeatedly at Guy White.
As to causation for those tenets of HBD? Verdict IS still out; try sometime going to a race blog with REAL scientific detachment. That's neither the point nor purpose of blogs like this, oneSTDV and their likes.

http://occidentalascent.wordpress.com/

THIS is a truly objective blog re. the heritability of intelligence and their group differences.


"If you wish to contribute to the discussion here, without being considered annoying, you'll have to do the following:

Concede that there are innate, genetic differences in the various human races/populations; including in intelligence, social organization, and propensity towards violence."


I've never argued 'blank-slate' theory ----- if so, please show me where. (And I promise, this is no 'Aw-shucks, Town-of-Mayberry ruse.' (lol!)


Do the above, and feel free to post your thoughts on fair and effective solutions, because that's where the conversation is here. (!!!)
(hysterical LOL!)

Anonymous said...

I have never been beaten up by a black guy and have actually been helped by one who was in mgmt when I needed a job. Nevertheless, I can understand how whites who have been ruled by blacks can feel very differently than I. For instance, I was a student at a local college and knew a young woman who grew up in SA and emigrated. She became almost literally sick to her stomach when blacks, esp black women, would saunter by when she and I were studying. I was stunned by what she would say under her breath. The difference had to be experienced to be understood. It was a mixture of fear and hatred, an allergic-like response which I haven't heard since.

Zenster said...

Sheila: At the other end of the spectrum, some White Nationalist sites (such as Occidental Observer) seem to take the position that "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" and go full-on pro-Arab in their anti-Jewish animus.

It may be "their prerogative" but thise who ally themselves with Muslims are dumber than a bag of hair. America did so to dislodge Soviet Russia from Afghanistan and we were repaid for our troubles with the 9-11 atrocity.

Blacks and Muslims alike display a towering ingratitude for any kindness because it typically reveals the serious weaknesses of their respective "cultures" (yes, those are sneer quotes).

Muslims are, perhaps, the best at disproving that old Arabic saying "the enemy of my enemy is my friend". Muslims are friends to no one save other Muslims and even then it's a dicey proposition. If you are an infidel, there is no such thing as an alliance with Muslims as they will doublecross you the instant it is beneficial for them to do so.

The clearest example of this lies in how, within Islam, there is no such concept as a permanent peace treaty or compact with any non-Muslim entity. The best you will get is hudna, a ten year maximum cessation of hostilities that Muslims can purposefully break at any time with complete religious sanction. Clearly, hudna is merely a ploy for getting the breathing space necessary to recruit and rearm, nothing else.

Those who are so anti-Semitic that they will get into bed with Muslims are insane. Their hatred has clearly overcome all sensibility.

Anonymous said...

Blacks have never been and will never be the equals of European Whites, but there is no question that they were improving-if by 'improving' we mean being more similar to Whites in cognitive ability, in social behavior, in self-control and in future orientation-throughout the century or so between Reconstruction and the Great Society: just as an elite black world formed in places like Harlem, never up to WASP standards but at least at first above the concentrations of recent Irish and Italian immigrants in the Northeast.

The Great Society undid in roughly one generation what had taken nearly a century to accomplish under the beneficient (if we are honest) ministrations of Jim Crow in the South and informal segregation in the Northeast and Midwest.

Simply put, the Great Society fomented and financed an orgy of dysgenic breeding, followed by less than useless childrearing and destructive educational practices.

In 1960, blacks knew they were an underclass, and while they resented it they accepted their lot. As their behavior improved, their lot did too. The better black neighborhoods had more crime than white ones, but a lot less than the really bad areas. Most Negroes wold cooperate with police to an extent and wanted the Negroes causing crime dealt with. Black earnings rose. Blacks did business primarily with other blacks, in black run businesses, which sometimes lacked white amenities or charged more, but they were with and around their own. There was a black aristocracy of sorts and a black middle class. Black schools were not as good as white ones, but blacks were usually afforded the opportunity to be educated to their capabilities, and black doctors, black lawyers and black accountants provided fairly good service, though usually not quite as good on average as the white businesses and professionals could provide.

Blacks knew that their lot was by and large better than any other place on could earth provide to blacks. They knew that black run countries were disasters and had no desire to emigrate there. On a certain level, they knew themselves.

The "civil rights era" and the Great Society did away with all that.

Blacks were stripped of their own aristocracy, their own natural leadership, and the best of their own professionals and businessmen, who became in effect honorary whites. The other businessmen and professionals simply became underperforming cogs in the greater integrated society, and the scions of store owners joined the military or got union autoworker, railroad or utility worker jobs-jobs 100 IQ, moderately motivated but physically able men could earn a middle class living at.

The black underclass-which, unlike the "talented tenth" whose reproductive rates mirrored white society, bred like rats-mushroomed. With IQs in the low to middle 90s at best, and a disinclination to "Act White" (i.e., at least pretend to civilized behavior, comprehensible English speech and normal mannerisms) their prospects were dismal.

When the Great Society Boomer generation became old enough to shoot an assault weapon, the rap-gang-drug wars began in the ghetto in earnest and began to involve white society. The response was to start jailing a large proportion of the black male underclass.This left a large number of mateless, stupid young black females whose function it was to get impregnated by the "fastest mutha*****s"-those black hoods ruthless or smart enough to stay out of jail a while and father a bevy of illegitimate offspring. The cycle begins anew.

Ending the cyycle is possible, but only given drastic action, and action that will inevitably be called "eugenic"-because that is exactly what it will, of necessity, be.

Until eugenics is no longer considered a four letter word, change is quite futile.

Mr. Rational said...

The black underclass... mushroomed. With IQs in the low to middle 90s at best, and a disinclination to "Act White" (i.e., at least pretend to civilized behavior, comprehensible English speech and normal mannerisms) their prospects were dismal.

Ending the cyycle is possible, but only given drastic action, and action that will inevitably be called "eugenic"-because that is exactly what it will, of necessity, be.

Until eugenics is no longer considered a four letter word, change is quite futile.


In other words, the anti-abortion OneSTDV is wrong, and Margaret Sanger was right.

Zenster said...

Excellent comment @ June 26 8:36 PM, Anonymous.

Anonymous said...

It is hard to see white privilege when Trayvon Martin is bashing your head against the ground.

Anonymous said...

Echoing another post why are they called African-Americans when clearly the can't?

Anonymous said...

The "Unfair Campaign" got all the publicity. But buried somewhere in the middle of the local paper months after the crime had occurred recently was the story of the brutal gang rape of an intoxicated woman (race ommitted from story)in Duluth, MN, in if memory serves March of 2012. One of the "alleged" actors, Deolow Jacquez Shaw, claimed that his coconspirator held a gun to his head and made him do it (he changed his story to the police after the DNA test was performed).

Far more nefarious than the "feel good" campaign, because it involves fighting crime and actual life and death scenarios, about a week or so ago, the City Council voted to have a "Police Review Commission", where Mayor Ness gets to appoint a seven person panel to second guess the police. The Mayor is instructed by ordinance to appoint three persons of color and two woman to be on the panel (Equal protection notwithstanding). When some concerned citizen had the audacity (in a democratic council meeting where the vote was to take place) to request a criminal background check of all appointees and not permit felons to be on the board, this individual was called down in public by one of the commission's "brainchild" as being racist.

That the Unfair Campaign exists, does not surprise me. The area houses a lot liberal radical professors and community activists (non native born transplants mostly) who constantly remind us of the 1920 Duluth Lynchings, the tragic story of three black carnival workers who were lynched by a mob after a white woman [claimed:revised] had been gang raped at the circus. There is now a monument celebrating their lives. Of course, these same people you refer to as DWL's do not live anywhere near Central Hillside, or the North End of Superior, Wisconsin.

What surprises me is that such measures, in a time when Duluth is being bombarded with drugs and violence, particularly in certain sections of the city (Central Hillside), that so few, if any stood up to what amounts to a glaring violation of our Constitution, where racial quotas dicate who gets to monitor the police.

It is almost comical, some of the things the campaign cites as being white privilege, like [paraphrasing], "being viewed only being here because of Duluth's generous social benefits". In 2009, I think something like 66 percent of black people in St. Louis County were on foodstamps. I recall, in 1999 or so, one of now "sponsors" of the Unfair Campaign, "Men as Peacekeepers" did a detailed study where they had access to every gun/violent offense act in Duluth. They published a study which intentionally ommitted one particular interesting piece of data. I'll leave you to guess what that might be.