Thursday, July 12, 2012

Houston, We have a Problem

Eric Holder to NAACP: Obama's War on White America will continue, unabated
This was posted at Vdare by PK, a look at the NAACP speech in Houston by Eric "My People" Holder, the first Black Attorney General in U.S. History and the first Attorney General held in contempt by Congress. At Vdare, Kersey wrote:
Well Let Me Just Say, I Love You Back NAACP." So begins Eric "My People" Holder's address to the NAACP National Convention in Houston, Texas Tuesday. We already know the Attorney General of the United States and the Department of Justice he leads considers white Christians to be second-class citizens in the eyes of the law; but it was this address to the NAACP that Holder reiterated that Obama's War on White America is alive and well.
In fact, Matt Drudge removed the color from his immensely important news aggregate site The Drudge Report, and had the ominous look of a black and white world, a gesture that was a clever way of pointing out the racially charged times we live in (the primary story as of 5:30 p.m. was a Washington Examiner piece that proclaims Mitt Romney is "too white" to address the NAACP).
Today, if you didn't believe that the 2012 Presidential Election was going to be the most racially divisive in American history, a cursory glance at Drudge should have been enough to warn you of what is coming. Politico reported on Holder's address to the NAACP (which Drudge links to the explosive headline "NAACP goes wild for Eric Holder..."
In a rousing speech at the NAACP convention in Houston, Attorney General Eric Holder on Tuesday strongly defended his efforts to block controversial voter ID laws in some states - including Texas - saying the Justice Department “will not allow political pretexts to disenfranchise American citizens of their most precious right.”
“The arc of American history has always moved toward expanding the electorate. It is what has made this nation exceptional. We will simply not allow this era to be the beginning of the reversal of that historic progress,” Holder told the assembled delegates.
Few people will dare hold Holder's feet to the fire for what he is and what he is doing, so we'll just lay it out: Eric Holder is a Black supremacist who holds the keys to the Department of Justice (DOJ) kingdom in his hands. And he is actively working to ensure that Obama's War on White America continues unabated, with full legal protection and backing from a color-conscious DOJ. 

It is from a 2009 Blog entry at Vdare that we learn why Holder seems so unconcerned with the rash of Black-on-white attacks/murders/Flash Mob (Mahogany Mob) incidents that have transpired since Obama took office. In a June 2009, Senate Judiciary Committee Hearing on the S.909, the Hate Crime Bill, Holder testified that these laws only protect certain groups:
Holder's testimony and questions lasted 75 minutes. In any normal environment his rigid and flat-footed performance would have to be deemed a disaster. As Pike notes:
Under questioning, Attorney Gen. Holder was surprisingly forthright in admitting that the hate bill is not intended to protect everyone, or even the majority. He said only historically oppressed minorities were to benefit. This means Jews, blacks, homosexuals, women, etc. Holder made it clear that if a white Christian male, including a serviceman or police officer, was the victim of a violent hate crime by any minority he would have to find redress from traditional law. He could not avail himself of the triple penalties and rapid government/justice system response given a protected minority.
These catastrophic admissions were extracted by Senators Sessions (R-AL) and Coburn (R-OK). The webcast of the Hearings is here (on right) and the relevant passages are 58.30-61 minutes (Sessions) and 71.30-5 minutes (Coburn).
Holder made it plain that he is seeking legal privileges for certain groups based on what he told Senator Sessions was
          "the unfortunate history of our nation".
Obama's War on White America is real. It is happening before our eyes. And the attendees of NAACP national conference (sponsored by many Fortune 100 companies) in Houston applauded this war, while booing Mitt Romney.

Romney to NAACP: "Elect me, BRA's power grows. Trust me."
Here is what Romney told the booing Black hordes at the NAACP convention, who just a day early chanted "Stand Your Ground" at Holder - an obvious reference to the simmering George Zimmerman-Trayvon Martin incident:
If someone had told us in the 1950s or 1960s that a black citizen would serve as the forty-fourth president, we would have been proud and many would have been surprised. Picturing that day, we might have assumed that the American presidency would be the very last door of opportunity to be opened. Before that came to pass, every other barrier on the path to equal opportunity would surely have come down. 
Of course, it hasn’t happened quite that way. Many barriers remain. Old inequities persist. In some ways, the challenges are even more complicated than before. And across America — and even within your own ranks — there are serious, honest debates about the way forward. 
If equal opportunity in America were an accomplished fact, then a chronically bad economy would be equally bad for everyone. Instead, it’s worse for African Americans in almost every way. The unemployment rate, the duration of unemployment, average income, and median family wealth are all worse for the black community. In June, while the overall unemployment rate remained stuck at 8.2 percent, the unemployment rate for African Americans actually went up, from 13.6 percent to 14.4 percent. 
Americans of every background are asking when this economy will finally recover – and you, in particular, are entitled to an answer. 
If equal opportunity in America were an accomplished fact, black families could send their sons and daughters to public schools that truly offer the hope of a better life. Instead, for generations, the African-American community has been waiting and waiting for that promise to be kept. Today, black children are 17 percent of students nationwide – but they are 42 percent of the students in our worst-performing schools.
Our society sends them into mediocre schools and expects them to perform with excellence, and that is not fair.  
The Republican Party’s record, by the measures you rightly apply, is not perfect. Any party that claims a perfect record doesn’t know history the way you know it. 
Yet always, in both parties, there have been men and women of integrity, decency, and humility who called injustice by its name. For every one of us a particular person comes to mind, someone who set a standard of conduct and made us better by their example. For me, that man is my father, George Romney. 
It wasn’t just that my Dad helped write the civil rights provision for the Michigan Constitution, though he did. It wasn’t just that he helped create Michigan’s first civil rights commission, or that as governor he marched for civil rights in Detroit – though he did those things, too. 
More than these public acts, it was the kind of man he was, and the way he dealt with every person, black or white. He was a man of the fairest instincts, and a man of faith who knew that every person was a child of God. 
I’m grateful to him for so many things, and above all for the knowledge of God, whose ways are not always our ways, but whose justice is certain and whose mercy endures forever. 
Every good cause on this earth relies in the end on a plan bigger than ours. “Without dependence on God,” as Dr. King said, “our efforts turn to ashes and our sunrises into darkest night. Unless his spirit pervades our lives, we find only what G. K. Chesterton called ‘cures that don’t cure, blessings that don’t bless, and solutions that don’t solve.’”
Of all that you bring to the work of today’s civil rights cause, no advantage counts for more than this abiding confidence in the name above every name. Against cruelty, arrogance, and all the foolishness of man, this spirit has carried the NAACP to many victories. More still are up ahead, and with each one we will be a better nation.

Detroit, the shining example of what the post-Civil Rights world birthed, is a direct representation of what Black people are capable of creating. Lacking the ability to sustain a world-class city, Romney would have us believe that it is some form of "institutional racism" that creates racial gaps in learning, income, wealth, test scores, etc. That Black mothers (72 percent of Blacks are born out of wedlock; don't call them "Black families" Romney) send their children to inadequate schools isn't due to a lack of money; most inner-city or majority Black schools receive more per-pupil funding than majority white schools.

That Black children are 42 percent of the enrollment at our worst-performing schools is because individual Black children combine to produce grades and standardized test scores that consistently make majority-Black schools the worst-performing in America.

Black unemployment rates are directly correlated to the fact that a great many Black people are unemployable in America's service economy, save for government/public jobs. Not institutional racism.

Obama's War on White America is real; worse, Romney has no problem taking the baton from that "half-white dude" and moving forward with it, were he elected as POTUS this upcoming November.

Houston, we have a problem.



69 comments:

Anonymous said...

'send their children to inadequate schools isn't due to a lack of money'

Inadequate IQ!!! Thats the problem.

Anonymous said...

I would not have voted for Mitt before I read his words. Now that I've read them, I'm quite satisfied that he is certifiably insane, and my decision if sealed. This guy is so out of touch with reality, it's scary. I suggest he go to Africa with Bush the Younger and hug some Bantu kids. Expect four more years of Obama.

MrGJG said...

There are no statesmen who will look out for White America. It doesn't matter if they know the score or if "they can see", as I'm sure most including Romney do and can.
The game is rigged against anyone with the balls to tell it like it is so either their labeled a crackpot or a racist and that's all she wrote.

The unfortunate thing is, the very people this individual would be speaking up for would be the same people who would be leading the charge to vilify him or her.
It's sickening.

Anonymous said...

Mitt Romney, I would hope that you would at least remove the criminal, Eric My People Holder, from the AG office.

I think Romney is a good man. He's White and can be persuaded to support the US Constitution, The Bill of Rights, and White people. I'm sure of it. He's got my vote.

Anonymous said...

Mitts dad also fought the Mormon church on its views to allow blacks to hold positions of power and the church sent letters to him warning of the dangers that lie ahead if segregation was taken down. Of course he didn't listen thinking that all people are equal in gods eyes. Before I became a realist I thought the Mormon church couldn't be a true church of god because of the way they treated blacks in the early days ( not that they were ill treated but just held has a savages incapable of living the commandments) now i think of how wise these early Lds prophets were.
Here's a link to the letter
http://www.boston.com/news/daily/24/delbert_stapley.pdf

I will still vote for mitt just to slow down the eventual demise of our country

Jay Santos said...

Romney is almost guaranteed, no matter what else he does, to be hyper-compassionate to "the plight of African-Americans". Whatever hard-nosed business approach he would normally use will be softened, perhaps to make up for the "historic injustices done to African Americans by my own Mormon faith". Or some such drivel.

Anonymous said...

Either Romney is delusional, uninformed and out of touch with reality, or that was one of the most intellectually dishonest speeches ever given by a politician.

Phalluster said...

"The arc of American history has always moved toward expanding the electorate. It is what has made this nation exceptional."

A disgusting lie. America was "exceptional" for nearly 200 years with its culture of slavery, segregation, and an ethnically-Protestant ruling class. In the aftermath of the New Deal, Civil Rights Act, free trade splurge, and homosexual advocacy explosion, the USA is plummeting down the rankings in all measurable metrics against other first-world countries.

When the Supreme Court was uniformly Protestant, the semblance of decency and productivity remained intact. Now, we are blessed with a panel of five Catholics (one Mexican), three jews (one obese lesbian), and a negro with a white wife. What morality of theirs do I share?

I don't want them, I don't need them, and I won't vote for anyone who does.

MuayTyson said...

Mitt is the best of the worst. He needs to be our stepping stone to reclaiming this country and reinstalling the Constitution. I think the people have more of a chance of forcing Mitt to follow our directive. We just need to be as hard or harder on him than Obama.

It will not be easy and it will be a game of inches but we need to force our will as the electorate.

YIH said...

An open question for Romney and Glen Bunk:
''And [God] had caused the cursing to come upon them, yea, even a sore cursing, because of their iniquity. For behold, they had hardened their hearts against him, that they had become like unto a flint; wherefore, as they were white, and exceedingly fair and delightsome, that they might not be enticing unto my people, the Lord God did cause a skin of blackness to come upon them. And thus saith the Lord God; I will cause that they shall be loathsome unto thy people, save they shall repent of their iniquities." (2 Nephi 5:21)
Agree or disagree? While not a Mormon, I tend to agree with the above.

So CAL Snowman said...

From our Friends across the pond in England via the Daily Mail :

Mitt Romney "Deliberately Got Booed" by the NAACP to Appeal to White Racists says MSNBC's Lawrence O'Donnell

Right like the Republican party gives two shits about "White Racists!" I swear the left wing media is becoming increasingly insane. Their rhetoric HAS to be pissing off center-liberal whites.

OT - If THEY are "big brother" I propose that we are "BIG MOTHER" (the internet version of Big Brother that increases EACH and EVERY day due to MSM lies and deceit). "BIG MOTHER" is watching "Big Brother."

Anonymous said...

"My People" Holder is nothing more than an angry mongrel. His innate confusion about his racial idenity gives him particular animosity towards this country's white establishment.
Accordingly, he acts in solidarity with America's Negro general population by refusing to assimilate into this European-based society.

Anonymous said...

I understand being unhappy with Romney and other panderers but if you think another 4 years of Obama and his fellow "death to whitey" psychopaths isn't worse then, sorry, you are out of your f-ing minds.

Anonymous said...

It amazes me what a mere 12% of the population have done to our country in a mere 50 years. From super-power to thrid world in 2 generations. However, does anyone really think we can go back to a segregated society? If anyone out there has an idea how this could be brought about, I'm all ears. Until then, it is just flight from one outer suburn to another. A few negroids have recently moved into my formerly peaceful gated apartment complex. Already, the pool is overun by load, obnoxious children (many of whom, I am sure, don't actually live here), and the amount of litter is increasing. Time to move even further out, until, of course, they extend the bus line again.

Anonymous said...

Blacks have squandered freedom. Not only that, but their freedom equals our enslavement, in that the propensity of the blacks to make our public spaces unpalatable & unsafe makes whites hole up at home with their entertainment centers and Red Box DVDs. I.B.M.G

Anonymous said...

Perhaps it is time to take a page out of Lenin's playbook: The worse, the better. Maybe our society is so corrupt, it is no longer salvageable. If that's the case, perhaps we should welcome the collapse. For example, the collapse of communism in Eastern Europe was painful and traumatic, but life is far better today than 30 years ago. A similar renewal might occur once our current liberal welfare state fails. Think of the positives: EBT cards would stop working, section 8 vouchers would go unpaid, doctors would stop taking Medicaid patients as funds dried up. At the very least, the Negroids would be thinned out without a paternalistic government to feed and clothe them.

Anonymous said...

Hey Ex-New Yorker!!!

Does any of this look familiar!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LwNgx7V4gwk&feature=relmfu


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AtI-En92Xso&feature=related

Paul's Biggest Fan said...

Oh, come on, vote for Romney - if for no other reason - to watch the inevitable riots that would follow his win.

Californian said...

"It wasn’t just that my Dad helped write the civil rights provision for the Michigan Constitution, though he did. It wasn’t just that he helped create Michigan’s first civil rights commission, or that as governor he marched for civil rights in Detroit – though he did those things, too."

It's pointless to claim that one was for civil rights--as a white man, Romney is still the enemy to the NAACP because he threatens to unseat Obama. Heck, the NAACP would endorse Bob Mugabe were he to run for president over the most PC DWL, let alone a Republican.

It's also pointless to claim that one was for civil rights back in the "day." If white people were responsible for establishing civil rights in Michigan, then it takes the glory away from MLK, NAACP, CORE, the BP, and all the rest of the "movement." In BRA mythology, freedom was not given by some law passed by a milquetoast white politician. Instead, blacks seized power via revolutionary action. The 1967 Detroit Riot was the Tet Offensive which turned the balance of power and put blacks in the driver's seat.

It's all basic rules for radicals. No revolutionary movement can allow an outsider to claim the mantle of leadership. And Romney will always be the outsider to the NAACP because he is white.

All this NAACP booing ought to give pause to white DWLs who suck up to BRA.

But it will not.



More than these public acts, it was the kind of man he was, and the way he dealt with every person, black or white. He was a man of the fairest instincts, and a man of faith who knew that every person was a child of God.


But does the NAACP think that every person is a child of God? Judging from the booing, the answer appears to be "no." If we had real equality in this country, it would mean an end to "hate crime" laws, AA, minority grants, black studies programs, MLK holidays, race hustling lawsuits, l'affaire Trayvon, and all the rest of the rackets making up BRA. Similarly, blacks in rainbow nations such as South Africa see no reason to maintain the pretense of struggle for equality once they are in the driver's seat. It's all about supremacy.

Again, all this ought to give pause to white DWLs who suck up to BRA.

But it will not.

Zenster said...

Holder made it clear that if a white Christian male, including a serviceman or police officer, was the victim of a violent hate crime by any minority he would have to find redress from traditional law.

Seeing as how White Christian males still, however narrowly, represent a majority of Americans, the message to take away is that this country's largest demographic should rely upon the Constitution for redress.

In reality, there is nothing wrong with such an idea, just so long as Constitutional Rights are properly upheld. The hitch comes when certain special "rights" abrogate equal protection under the law. That is what we currently experience and Holder makes an inadvertently frank admission of this by declaring the specificity of 'minority protections'.

Holder made it plain that he is seeking legal privileges for certain groups based on what he told Senator Sessions was

"the unfortunate history of our nation".


Is there any more monstrous tissue of hor$e$hit that could be flung against America? What damned "unfortunate history of our nation"? As if "unfortunate" could even marginally encompass any adequate description of the magnificence that America has achieved in its brief appearance upon the global stage.

In a mere century or two the USA has, in essence, humiliated almost every other nation on earth. Yet, throngs of the most barbaric and throwback cultures on this planet continue to insist that America must be ashamed of its unprecedented success.

What more is needed than a collective crotch-grab and an invitation to "condemn this" even as these failed nation states, cannibal clans, genocidal sects and sub-moron recruiters of child soldiers continue to whine about how their Neanderthal (at BEST!) cultures are eclipsed by a bunch of evolutionary outcasts who just happened to invent almost every last advanced technology on the planet?

Again, go figure.

PS: Paul, I'm astonished that you did not use your "Houston, We have a Problem" header as the perfect intro to your usual and perfectly appropriate mention of how "we could have been on Mars".

Damn it all if we couldn't have even have been mining the asteroid belt for megatons of precious metals by now if only uplifting those who adamantly refuse to do so had been cast aside at the first indication of their unwillingness.

Anonymous said...

According to Drudge, Mitt is considering Condi for VP.

Condi, who not only celebrated, praised and defended Obama for the past 3.5 years but is hand-in-hand with him for black supremacy.

I'm looking into third candidates right now.

Full Auto said...

When we get a presidential candidate that can walk into an NAACP gathering, step up to the podium, look them straight in the eyes and say, "Stop murdering my people," then we will get our country back.

Zenster said...

Anon (7/1 6:07 PM): I understand being unhappy with Romney and other panderers but if you think another 4 years of Obama and his fellow "death to whitey" psychopaths isn't worse then, sorry, you are out of your f-ing minds.

[golf clap]

Anonymous said...

The high yellas are always the worst.

YIH said...

Remember, ''what happens in Vegas stays in Vegas'' is nothing more than a cheap marketing slogan.
Well, a ''chimpout'' with actual chimps happened there today.
For those who consider the term ''chimpout'' offensive, consider why the term has gained traction. (H/T, The Big Lie on Parade, Auster, and the ever-popular World Star Hip Hop who documents so adroitly ''Blacks Being Black'')
P.S. To the Anon who mentioned Romney may be considering Condeleeza Rice for Veep, my suggestion would be for Mitt to firmly clutch a pen in his right hand, continuously refer to himself in the third person and after he loses, go plug Viagra.

MuayTyson said...

Segregation will happen by it self as soon as we can repeal the 1965 Civil Rights act and end EBT, Section 8, most Welfare, and Affermative Action.

Take the teeth away from the beast and it will slink away on it's own.

Californian said...

Perhaps it is time to take a page out of Lenin's playbook: The worse, the better. Maybe our society is so corrupt, it is no longer salvageable. If that's the case, perhaps we should welcome the collapse.

There's a big debate about "worse is better." Does oppression and crisis alienate more people who then become the foundation for a new radical movement? (And civil rights for whites is pretty radical these days!)

It comes down to this: worse actually is better if there is a political movement which can seize the opportunities provided by a deteriorating situation, and give people a realistic alternative.

This is something which I see websites such as SBPDL doing, providing the first stage of a radical movement: creating a consciousness and recruiting people. PK has hit on the formula of righteous anger at obvious injustices, backed up with facts, and then showing the political implications. Look at the number of people who have posted here: "I used to be a liberal on race, until x-y-z."

One example of the effectiveness is the number of intelligent race realist comments being posted throughout the blogosphere.

So keep up the pressure!

(By the way, the fellow who posted the link to the Army PSYOP manual was dead-on right about that; anyone challenging the system needs to educate themselves on the techniques of agitprop, or "infowar" as it is called these days.)

ChrisD said...

Think of this election and the four years that follow as an extended radiation and chemotherapy treatment. The patient (the USA) needs more radical therapy, the kind that almost kills the patient. In other words, worse is better, and four more years of Obama has a better chance of waking people up than a demoralizing GOP hack. Maybe mainstream "conservatism" will finally be discredited after Romney's pathetic performance and subsequent loss. Obviously they haven't learned a damn thing since McCain's joke of a campaign.

I will most likely vote for Virgil Goode. I said all along I would vote for Romney unless he chose professional Hispanic Marco Rubio as his running mate, but now after this sickening pander fest in front of people that would never ever vote for him, there is just no way I can do it. He deserves to lose. Conservatism Inc. deserves to die.

Anonymous said...

Those who think that Mitt is somehow "better" than Obama because he is white, or will look out for white interests, or is a "first step" in "taking back the country" are simply mixing their own KooL-Aid. Hope it goes down nice and smooth.

And now it's Condi? The Republicans are despicable, and worthless. Face it, folks. There is no mainstream "choice." Sorry.

Anonymous said...

In South Africa, the current government is so corrupt a cabinet minister would be more likely to expense prostitutes, or vacation homes, a jet or even a Lamborghini.

Outside of Italy or Rodeo Drive in Hollywood, you will never see as many Lamborghinis as ply Durban’s exclusive Florida Road, where South Africa’s elite go to see and be seen. All of them are owned by people with shady connections to the country’s government, our cynical South African hosts assured us as we rubbernecked.

The top political scandal in South Africa last week was the revelation that the country’s swaggering president, Jacob Zuma, had ordered himself a gigantic new Boeing jetliner at public expense. Cost: Two billion rand.

That’s equal to $243 million Canadian dollars, making it the most expensive government jet for any political leader in the world – for a country where more than 12 million of its 50 million citizens live on less than $1.25 per day, housed in corrugated metal shacks.

After the newspapers intimated Zuma wanted the jet to fly his four Zulu wives to their Parisian shopping sprees, government officials claimed the jet order had been cancelled. Few believe that in a country seemingly run by a network of thieves who steal on a scale that makes former Detroit mayor Kwame

Kilpatrick look like a petty chiseler.

Anonymous said...

Romney is perfectly aware that Sub-Saharan Africans are the only racial group that never evolved outside the warm evergreen baby crib of the human species and, therefore, have the weakest DNA on the planet. However, he has to be circumspect in public and can't be as brutally honest as we are on SBPDL.

Holder is a prime example of the liberal attitude that White America is a giant Pinata to be constantly beaten for goodies for "my people".

The last thing you'll hear from the obamanation is that black people are responsible for their own well being and, instead of being parasites on White America, they should be industrious, thrifty, and sexually responsible.

Anonymous said...

Unreconstructed Confederate:

Having been born in 1946, I was
aware of the civil rights movement
from the beginning. America turned
itself upside down to accommodate
a whining, threatening minority,
in order to reverse the "separate
but unequal" condition of society.
Ironically, the "new America" is a
worse place for almost everybody,
as shown by the fact that many
black educators are now in favor
of school segregation by both race
and gender.
For a much lower cost--in both
dollars and human misery--many of
the problems could have been at
least somewhat improved by a policy
of making the separate conditions
equal.
Back in 1967, I wrote, in a
college publication, that the
so-called "Negro problem" was not
a problem at all, but rather a
tragedy. I also wrote that there
was no solution, and no happy
ending. I predicted, some 45
years ago, that there would be a
second American civil war.
It seems that I was much wiser
than all the "learned professors"
whose advice was followed by
leaders of both political parties.

Anonymous said...

I have always maintained that you cannot really understand blacks until you work with them. The one's I work with, who were formerly friendly to me are now not speaking to me at all. My crime? I expressed the opinion the Obama should not be re-elected. You have to understand that they are, mentally, on another more primitive level. They are simply not capable of higher, abstract thought patterns. This is why they can't see past the upcoming election. I'm sure most of them don't understand term limits and genuinely think that Obama can remain president forever as long as he keeps winning elections.

Anonymous said...

I would hardly consider what Romney said to be "pandering" to blacks. His comments were pretty much accurate, and made in a way that was civil and empathetic (without being servile). I mean, would you rather that he had said, "Listen, you lazy, welfare-collecting, crack-smoking, felony-committing, S.O.B.s, you need to quit blaming Whitey for your failings. America doesn't owe you a damned thing"? I'm sure that would have gone over real well.

I'm not really understanding the anti-Romney sentiment. No, he's not as conservative as many would like, and no, he's not as open about protecting White interests as we would like. But all you Romney haters need to get through your thick skulls that this guy is the BEST chance of stopping BRA in its tracks that we have. At this point, he's the only chance of stopping it, and make no mistake about it.....the only way of stopping BRA is politically.

So, keep bashing Romney, dickheads. All that's going accomplish is another 4 years of this current administration. Even the dumbest among you are capable of realizing how disastrous that would be for this country and for White interests.

eah said...

I mean, would you rather that he had said, "Listen, you lazy, welfare-collecting, crack-smoking, felony-committing, S.O.B.s, you need to quit blaming Whitey for your failings. America doesn't owe you a damned thing"?

Uhh, yes. That would've been great. Not to mention long overdue. You see, the 'black vote' doesn't mean shit. Romney could win easily even if not a single Black voted for him. I'm not saying that it would be easy, but it could be. Of course he'd need a double digit margin over Obama among white voters, but saying something akin to what you wrote, as well as promising to repeal affirmative action in federal hiring across the board (not to mention vigorously enforce immigration law, including hammering employers), would go a long way to getting him that margin.

But they're not called the 'Stupid Party' for nothing.

Anonymous said...

As far as Condoleezza Rice is concerned, maybe that's a rumor spread by creepy Billy Kristol or someone like that. Romney's not THAT stupid. Don't know about the woman heading the VP search for him though. Is Condoleezza a real name?

Sheila said...

All these "anonymous" folks urging us to vote for Romney are certifiably PC approved and respectable to mainstream society. They think that merely putting a White face on show will somehow "save" this country, or slow down its demise. Romneycare, anyone? Pandering to blacks, anyone? He's more of a neocon than Obama, so the Jews should be happy, except that he's a Mormon . . oh dear.

All of this also ignores the hordes of angry anti-Whites that Obama has seeded throughout every single executive department. We're not talking Hillary as Secretary of State, we're talking about the under-under secretaries and the staff at the embassies. We're not talking Holder, but all the lawyers and bureaucrats at Justice. Will mittens, or any respectable repuke, take on the purge of all these blacks,Chinese, Indians, and DWLs that is absolutely imperative to change their direction and thinking? Look at what the Carter and Clinton appointees have done - and don't fool yourself, there are plenty of them still there. Look at the top brass at the Pentagon. Check out who initially promoted and pushed them. They're the ones who are perfectly happy with gays and women and blacks as elite special forces. Look at labor. Look at energy. We're talking literally thousands of bureaucrats throughout Washington and around the country who will continue to make daily policies and regulations - and electing a White face with an R(espectable) isn't going to stop them.

Sorry, folks, but you're delusional. Historical America is dead as a doornail, and I want out of the abomination using its name.

Anonymous said...

I have always maintained that you cannot really understand blacks until you work with them. The one's I work with, who were formerly friendly to me are now not speaking to me at all. My crime? I expressed the opinion the Obama should not be re-elected. You have to understand that they are, mentally, on another more primitive level.

I'm sure you said that half jokingly knowing how they moronically worship their mulatto king who has zero slave blood, who is Kenyan from East Africa while all blacks here were taken from East Africa, who has nothing to do with the black-American experience, who was raised by whites, who went to the best schools due to affirmative action granted by white benefactors

Obama is their king. BTW that pos Eric Holder has zero slave blood. His grandparents immigrated to this "racist" nation from that sun baked turdpie known as Barbados. Same as his wife grandparents. These two "immigrants" Holder and Obama are trying to destroy white traditional America as best they can and replace it with minority run America which includes all the aggrieved such as gays and lesbians, miscegenation minded white women (traitors) and any brown immigrant (legal or illegal) that gets here on the banana boat. Our legal third world immigrants suck off various kinds welfares and SS disability like you wouldn't belive

anony2

Ray Scissom said...

The very fact that a white politician would dignify a racist organization like the NAACP by speaking at their conference is appalling. Why is he pandering to the 12%? I will not vote against Obama in this election. I'll write in or stay home if these two clowns are the only choice. A vote for Mitt is a vote for crony capitalism and a vote for the facsist police state that prevents us from defending ourselves. A vote for Mitt is a vote for more of the same. I don't oppose Obama on the basis of his race. He's a domestic and foreign policy disaster and an economic cynanide pill for this nation. I'm not going to vote for his white clone just because he plays for the R wing of the one party. If the snacks they sell at the church where I vote weren't so delicious, I'd probably stay home.

Anonymous said...

'Anonymous said...

It amazes me what a mere 12% of the population have done to our country in a mere 50 years. From super-power to thrid world in 2 generations'
NAA...what happened is 'the floodgates opened' [gee thanks great american Teddy K]
Perior to '65, there was quoats, origin of nations clauses in immigration...
WE HAVE ADDED 100+ MILLION IN ABOUT 45 YEARS............
THIS IS A DISASTER RAPIDLY BECOMING WORSE.

Californian said...

Outside of Italy or Rodeo Drive in Hollywood, you will never see as many Lamborghinis as ply Durban’s exclusive Florida Road, where South Africa’s elite go to see and be seen.

The waBenz have spread that far south. Or should we call them the "waLambos?"

I was in SA back when it was white ruled, and most of the cars you saw on the streets were Ford Escorts and the like. There seemed to be an effort among whites to not push their wealth into the face of the black masses. This was partially from a kind of puritanism making ostentatious displays of wealth bad taste, but also to avoid making the disparities between white and black too obvious as that might have a radicalizing effect.

But it seems that today, SA's black leaders have no such compunctions. Maybe the black masses see the expensive foreign cars as symbols of "their" chiefs power, some of which may trickle down to them?


Back in 1967, I wrote, in a
college publication, that the
so-called "Negro problem" was not
a problem at all, but rather a
tragedy. I also wrote that there
was no solution, and no happy
ending.


It's been a tenet of liberal faith that all social problems can be solved. In the 45 years since you made that comment we have seen every last liberal attempt to solve the racial problem put into effect and then go down to screaming defeat...only to be followed by yet more liberal programs which fail and so forth until it all spirals downward into oblivion.

As I've frequently pointed out, liberals have given blacks everything they have wanted, from Brown v Board of Education to Obama in the White House. Yet (1) no social problems have been solved; and (2) demands by the race hustlers are getting ever more militant.

Despite its obvious record of failure, liberalism has a bizarre deathlock on the majority of elite opinion makers.

Truly a bizarre situation.

~AV~ said...

Eric Holder heads up the

"Just Us" department which excludes protection for YT

Whiskey said...

As Derbyshire noted today in VDARE, White women lapped up (and some White men) "White guilt porn" like "the Blind Side" and "the Help" both written by White Southerners. What else could anyone expect Romney to say or do? Tell the truth?

Almost no one in White America wants to know the truth, they'd rather as Derbyshire notes, retreat to the comfortable lies of the PC/Diversity dogma that forms the real religion of America and the West. Not the least that it offers feminized men and women the easy status markers of the elites. Since everyone now dresses like a slob, "moral" status markers are all that's left.

Romney is better than Obama. He won't have Holder as AG. He won't seize your guns under the UN Treaty that Obama plans to do. He won't be as open borders (and in fact rejected that pandering to Rupert Murdoch's face to the point that Murdoch does not support him) as Obama. Not that he will enforce the border any more than Bush did, but he will be less worse than Obama.

Lets not have any illusions, Black people and Mexican people are not the problem -- White people are. As Derbyshire notes, Whites are not "sheeple" but don't want to think too much about policy and science. They'd rather trust the authorities and this goes double for White women who are status-hungry and sick of men who are their equal or lower.

Long term (like the next 10 years) science and fiscal reality together will hammer PC/Diversity religion into oblivion. Not the least of which is that Black/Hispanic people are not happy to live in Favela hovels and places like San Bernadino (and perhaps LA) are going bankrupt. Machiavelli noted the surest way to make permanent enemies devoted to your destruction is to make them poor.

Holder and the rest have had an easy time of it providing special protections and racial privileges for Blacks and Hispanics, to a lesser extent gays and White women. But ultimately even White women will have their pocketbooks and bank accounts raided to pay for BRA.

THAT is the critical weakness, like a shark that must keep swimming or drown, BRA must take ever greater cash out of White America's wallets.

No, Mitt Romney cannot even allow himself to think the truth much less speak it, because PC/Diversity religion has an Inquisition like hold on White America. He can however speak of fiscal reality because no one wants to spend their money on other people. Not even Liberals. You don't see Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie shelling out their fortune in Detroit or New Orleans.

Zenster said...

Californian: It's pointless to claim that one was for civil rights--as a white man, Romney is still the enemy to the NAACP because he threatens to unseat Obama. Heck, the NAACP would endorse Bob Mugabe were he to run for president over the most PC DWL, let alone a Republican.

Should anyone require a demonstration of this irrational monolithic racial solidarity amongst Blacks, merely consider how the ANC (African National Congress), adamantly refused to censure or condemn Mugabe for his looting and rape of Zimbabwe. Now the proud issuer of this world's only 100 TRILLION DOLLAR banknote.

Anonymous said...

This political theater is for women and minorities, white men, there's no need to discuss it. They're just frontmen for bankers that took over this country.

Anonymous said...

Californian said:

"...It comes down to this: worse actually is better if there is a political movement which can seize the opportunities provided by a deteriorating situation, and give people a realistic alternative. ..."

THE most organized political movement with tentacles throughout government and a stranglehold on society is the radical Marxist anti-white Left. It isn't PK and a group of armchair revolutionaries who haven't taken step one to get organized.

Just look to Egypt. When the collapse came, victory went to the only group that was organized: The Muslim Brotherhood. The "moderate", "secular" groups were all caught flat-footed and lost big.

No, if you invite a collapse now, you invite total defeat and the possibility of hard totalitarianism. Re-electing Obama/Holder takes us there on the express train.

As much as I'm disgusted by Romney pandering to the NAACP and bragging about his father's role in creating BRA, and doubly disgusted that he would float the name of Condi Rice for VP, and triply disgusted that after saying during the primaries he was against Amnesty he turns around and starts talking about "Comprehensive Immigration Reform", despite all that, Obama/Holder is infinitely worse.

Obama/Holder is Actual Black Run America. Obama/Holder is a criminal enterprise. Obama/Holder is a war on white people. Obama/Holder is looting the treasury of trillions, degrading our economy, degrading our energy infrastructure, degrading the military by leaving our men in the mideast to die (yes, to DIE - they are accomplishing nothing in America's interest by being there), establishing a defacto dictatorship and ruling by decree while the Congress sits with its thumb up its ass and the Supreme Court plays politics for brownie points. And white America is so brainwashed that 2/3 of Drudge readers can say Condi Rice is a great pick for VP, while 40+ percent say Obama is doing a good job. We are in deep, deep trouble friends.

You only have two choices: Obama or Romney. Jesus Christ isn't on the ballot. Virgil Goode will not become President. Every one of you who stays home in disgust or throws away your vote on a protest candidate to show how principled you are represent one vote that Romney did NOT get in your state. When the votes are counted, if more people voted for Obama than voted for Romney, Obama wins and we're that much closer to hell on earth. Remember Florida 2000 - it came down to fewer than 600 votes out of many millions.

When Americans elected Obama/Holder they put their own worst enemy in the White House. Obama is a Marxist ideologue. At least Romney can be influenced to do the right thing. It's a small step back from the abyss, but it's all we've got.

So CAL Snowman said...

Whiskey said : "You don't see Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie shelling out their fortune in Detroit or New Orleans."

Brad Pitt's 'Make It Right Foundation' Builds Green Homes For Katrina-Hit Neighborhood, New Orleans' Lower Ninth Ward

Brad Pitt shelled out over $5 million of his own money to start the foundation. Also saying Blacks/Mexicans AREN'T the problem, but White people are is like saying METH is not the problem the METH DEALERS are the problem. WRONG, ALL parties are to blame.

Anonymous said...

It is very interesting that negroes are incapable of understanding that by opposing voter ID laws, they are aiding in their own marginalization by effectively helping illegal Mexicans become a larger voting bloc. Negroes are taken for granted now by the Dems. How much more so when there is a larger bloc of illiterate parasites to court instead?

Negroes: Too stupid for words.

tsnamm said...

"When we get a presidential candidate that can walk into an NAACP gathering, step up to the podium, look them straight in the eyes and say, "Stop murdering my people," then we will get our country back." Why bother to say anything to them?...they will never listen, agree, or THINK. It's a waste of time trying to reason with schwoogs. Why Romney would even bother to show up is another joke. Everyone knew this was gonna happen. He could have crawled on his belly and offered kiss every niggers ass, and he would have received the same reaction. There's no need to talk, cajole, or otherwise engage in "discussion" with them. We already know the answer. What we need to do is move on before there is no time left. Romney is the lesser of 2 evils, but it makes little difference. He's not a solution to the problem, simply a speed bump to slow things down a bit. The Republican Party is on the fast track to irrelevancy.. With all the illegal amnesties etc, the only demographic the Republicans can count on(whites)will soon be a minority. And yet all they do is ignore them and try to pander to people who hate their guts. Brilliant plan.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...July 13, 2012 5:43 AM
I would hardly consider what Romney said to be "pandering" to blacks. His comments were pretty much accurate, and made in a way that was civil and empathetic (without being servile). I mean, would you rather that he had said, "Listen, you lazy, welfare-collecting, crack-smoking, felony-committing, S.O.B.s, you need to quit blaming Whitey for your failings. America doesn't owe you a damned thing"? I'm sure that would have gone over real well.


I think they expect Romney to leap onstage while "Dixie" is blaring at 120 decibels and a gigantic Confederate flag unfurls as Romney flips them off with both hands and screams, "Fuck you, niggers!"

There are some intelligent posters here and then there are the ones who say things like, "We're gunna send 'em all back to AFRICA!" Right. Don't look now, geniuses, but we've got a black Attorney General who rules the land like a king in league with an executive order-issuing black president who operates with complete and total disregard for the Constitution. Not to mention an entrenched ruling bureaucracy and media/propaganda machine that values black lives far more than white ones. But we're going to "send 'em all back to Africa." Right. I can feel that about to happen any second.


I'm not really understanding the anti-Romney sentiment. No, he's not as conservative as many would like, and no, he's not as open about protecting White interests as we would like. But all you Romney haters need to get through your thick skulls that this guy is the BEST chance of stopping BRA in its tracks that we have. At this point, he's the only chance of stopping it, and make no mistake about it.....the only way of stopping BRA is politically.


What makes me really despair about the fate of America and of whites in general is...white people, as Whiskey alludes to in this thread. The dumb-as-a-box-of-rocks mentality I describe above, the tendency for many to say that, if they don't get every single unrealistic thing they want right now, they're going to kick and scream and shit in their crib is lazy and evidence of weakness.

You combine those people with the brainwashed "Stuff White People Like" nitwits and we whites have really gotten ourselves into a tought spot.

The radical white-hating leftists who did the "long march" through academia and the media over the last 50 years were very patient and shrewd. They didn't achieve great power overnight. They schemed night and day and over a period of many years of careful, relentless effort reached a point where they almost completely own America. You just don't see that from white rights people. Most want everything and they want it right now while often not being willing to risk anything and not being willing to forgo instant gratification to fight the long war.

We've got to be every bit as devious and relentless as the anti-whites have been. And that includes electing a guy like Romney while planning the next steps to pressure the society to do what WE want for a change.


So, keep bashing Romney, dickheads. All that's going accomplish is another 4 years of this current administration. Even the dumbest among you are capable of realizing how disastrous that would be for this country and for White interests.

Hey, some say that we NEED another 4 years of Obama to really teach people a lesson. If another 4 years is good, why stop there? Let's have 48 straight years of ruling black apartheid. That should really fix things, right?

Anonymous said...

Californian said...July 13, 2012 2:38 PM

Right f-ing on. Well said.

Anonymous said...

"we've got a black Attorney General who rules the land like a king in league with an executive order-issuing black president who operates with complete and total disregard for the Constitution. Not to mention an entrenched ruling bureaucracy and media/propaganda machine that values black lives far more than white ones."

The reaction to the Virginia Pilot's suppression of the Black Pack Attack story only needs to be lightly armed and directed at the individuals responsible to eliminate that sort of thing almost overnight.

Academic and business diversity officers. Business diversity consultants. Immigration attorneys. They have to advertise and have offices to exist. Do I make myself clear?

"The radical white-hating leftists who did the "long march" through academia and the media over the last 50 years were very patient and shrewd. They didn't achieve great power overnight. They schemed night and day and over a period of many years of careful, relentless effort reached a point where they almost completely own America."

They are academics. They live at listed addresses. They hold scheduled classes and office hours and have speaking engagements. If we went for them, how long would they last? Days.

Zenster said...

I have to say this, Romney's Mormonism makes him supremely vulnerable regarding any sort of critical religious commentary. To gain some sort of sense with respect to how sensitive the Mormon Church is to such criticism, read, "The Mormon Murders" by Steven Naifeh and Gregory White Smith.

This book details just how fragile the Mormon church is about anything that will reveal its dubious and ultimately questionable heritage which was bred up amongst the swindling and hucksterism of its founder, Joseph Smith.

Lucas Evans said...

a little OT

cofcc.org has an article up about how the internet is becoming so racist that major sites are considering major changes to increase censorship.

Full Auto said...

White politicians must stop pandering to nonwhites. They are the enemy. They are our competitors. They are not our friends. They do not have our interests in mind, only their own. THEY have made all these things so.

For every black or hispanic Romney wins over, ten whites will be alienated and lost. White politicians are fighting a losing battle here as well as wasting their time and resources.

Look no further than black racist negroid Holder for confirmation of this "us against them" attitude.. Of course, this is a part of human nature. The problem is that only whites pretend it doesn't exist. Well it does and it IS us against them.

Anonymous said...

"major sites are considering major changes to increase censorship."

Craig's List appears to have a list of keywords which lowers the flagging threshold for a post, or doesn't let it be published at all. I just posted a link to the Black Racism and Hatred blog and it was flagged less than an hour from posting.

Zenster said...

Anon (7/13 6:18 PM): Hey, some say that we NEED another 4 years of Obama to really teach people a lesson. If another 4 years is good, why stop there? Let's have 48 straight years of ruling black apartheid. That should really fix things, right?

Your equation drags, kicking and screaming, into the foreground that old adage about a baker:

IF I BAKED MY BREAD FOR ONE HOUR AND IT TASTES GOOD, BAKING IT FOR TWO HOURS SHOULD MAKE IT TASTE TWICE AS GOOD.

Sometimes, it's better to quit while you're ahead. This is one of those times.

Discard said...

Whiskey said "PC/diversity dogma...offers feminized men and women the easy status markers of the elites. Since everyone now dresses like a slob, "moral" status markers are all that's left".

True. We'd be much better off with a return to sumptuary laws that forbade commoners from dressing like their betters. As it now stands, the beliefs that people adopt to demonstrate their social superiority are far more absurd and damaging than purple silk and ermine, or corsets and top hats.

Anonymous said...

As much as it pains me to agree with a Marxist view, I am afraid you are 100% right. The niggers would not survive without the nanny state here to pay for their every meal, health care, cell phones, and so on. I truly hope for the sake of all decent white people the collapse comes down, quickly and harshly, on the degenerate negro population

Zenster said...

Discard: We'd be much better off with a return to sumptuary laws that forbade commoners from dressing like their betters. As it now stands, the beliefs that people adopt to demonstrate their social superiority are far more absurd and damaging than purple silk and ermine, or corsets and top hats.

Discard, you are onto something very important here. I wrote about how DWL's fawn over Muslims in my essay, "The Turban Kissers". DWL's slobber over, whilst simultaneously despising, Blacks in the exact same manner and subject both groups to their intense bigotry of "soft racism", in the form of lowered expectations. As to your observation about "sumptuary laws" (e.g., Imperial Japan and any cultivation by commoners of the 16 petal chrysanthemum), we are now in an era of "moral sumptuary laws" whereby the intelligence and critical analysis skills needed to parse out the glaring flaws in Political Correctness are verboten. It is one of the only explanations for how public education has descended into undiluted indoctrination and no longer has even the slightest whiff of scholarly pursuit to it.

Please consider writing an essay about this for publication here at SBPDL, I'm sure Paul would welcome it. This concept touches upon another work in progress of mine about "The Imperative of Failure". It is a subset with respect to my diagnosis of Liberalism as a form of mental illness or psychopathology. Witness just how many Liberal families routinely spawn total basket cases as children or, worse yet, abject Eloi who are just waiting to become payers of the "Black Tax".

Liberals literally want their children to be intellectually disarmed so that there is very little chance of them ever peircing the veil of Magical Thinking™ which guides so much of what passes for Leftist "thought". It is to the point where Liberal parents now hurl their children into the furnace without a backward glance.

[to be continued]

Zenster said...

Witness the case of Amy Biehl (Wikipedia, salt to taste):

When 26-year-old Biehl drove a friend home to the township of Guguletu, outside Cape Town, on August 25, 1993, a black mob pelted her car with stones and smashed its windows while shouting racial epithets. Biehl was struck in the head with a brick, then dragged from her car and surrounded by a mob who stoned and stabbed her to death while she begged for her life. According to Rex van Schalkwyk, in his 1998 book One Miracle is Not Enough: “Supporters of the three men accused of murdering [her] … burst out laughing in the public gallery of the Supreme Court today when a witness told how the battered woman groaned in pain.” (pp. 188-89.) Four of Biehl's murderers were convicted for her killing; however, in 1998, all were pardoned by South Africa's Truth and Reconciliation Commission. Biehl's family supported release of the killers, and her father shook the murderers' hands, stating that

"The most important vehicle of reconciliation is open and honest dialogue...we are here to reconcile a human life which was taken without an opportunity for dialogue. When we are finished with this process we must move forward with linked arms."


The pathology is thick enough to spread on toast! The quote by Biehl's father may as well be that of General George Casey speaking about the Fort Hood massacre:

"Our diversity, not only in our Army, but in our country, is a strength. And as horrific as this tragedy was, if our diversity becomes a casualty, I think that’s worse,”

As I mentioned, "The Imperative of Failure" reigns supreme in a Politically Correct society that can be demolished by just an ounce of truth. This human sacrifice of their own offspring that's being practiced by Liberals is surpassed only by the "Palestinians" and their smiling bomb-laden children. There is present in both a hatred of life (i.e., Liberal self-loathing) and love of death that so closely approximates pure unalloyed Evil as to be indistinguishable from it. No better proof exists than the clear-cut racism and incendiary hatred of all things American that spew from the Oval Office's current chair-warmer.

Anonymous said...

Biehl's family supported release of the killers, and her father shook the murderers' hands, stating that "The most important vehicle of reconciliation is open and honest dialogue...we are here to reconcile a human life which was taken without an opportunity for dialogue. When we are finished with this process we must move forward with linked arms."

It's morbidly fascinating how Christians and Western whites in general indulge in ostentatious forgiveness of the most evil behavior imaginable.

When you immediately make a show of "forgiving" subhuman demons like the blacks who killed Amy Biehl you are in fact enabling them and supporting them in their evil conduct.

Look at this case: 'I FORGIVE you': Father's extraordinary comments to man who 'raped and killed 10-year-old daughter and wife before leaving him for dead' with brain damage after claw hammer home invasion

Arturo Martinez, 39, barely survived brutal home invasion when attacker killed his wife Yardira and daughter Karla

The husband and father who woke up in his Las Vegas home to find his wife and daughter beaten to death said Thursday that he has taken the unfathomable step of forgiving their attacker.

Still bearing the scars of the brutal attack which left him requiring two major brain surgeries after 17 head fractures, Arturo Martinez appeared at a press conference three months after the random claw hammer attack.

To gasps from the shocked audience, Mr Martinez said that he would even let 22-year-old Bryan Clay, who broke into their home randomly before raping and killing Mr Martinez's wife and 10-year-old daughter, kiss him on the cheek.

An emotional Mr Martinez said 'I forgive you. That's it, nothing else.' 'And if he gave me a kiss, I would give him a kiss.'



I understand the guy's dealing with horror and terrible injuries as best he can but this going out of our way to make showboating, over the top displays of forgiveness towards the most evil, subhuman monsters imaginable who have not even ASKED for forgiveness is another sign of the decay and perversion of Western civilization. It's not "Christian," it's groveling before evil.

Anonymous said...

This human sacrifice of their own offspring that's being practiced by Liberals is surpassed only by the "Palestinians" and their smiling bomb-laden children. There is present in both a hatred of life (i.e., Liberal self-loathing) and love of death that so closely approximates pure unalloyed Evil as to be indistinguishable from it.

Really excellent point, Zenster.

Discard said...

To those who drink the leftist poison, the murders of their children are the greatest opportunity of their lives to demonstrate their moral superiority. Down at the church, the preacher is fawning over them for "following Jesus' example". They are even worse than those parents who use the occasion of their offsprings' accidental or deserved death to sue innocent, deep-pocketed third parties for millions. Do not doubt for a second that they are fully compensated for their loss, by the moral status given them by like minded degenerates.

Anonymous said...

My response to "worse is better" is that if they haven't learned by now they aren't going to learn. Period.

Romney will stretch the glide until I'm in my late 50s, and we might have one or two more respectacon administrations after him. They'll keep the rotting dock floating maybe another twenty years. If I live that long, I'll have a modest pension in dollars and a hundred grand in Swiss gold I'm slowly stashing away, and it will let me live out my life somewhere like Chile or Uruguay, or Switzerland.

Après moi, le déluge.

Zenster said...

Thank you to everyone who responded about my Amy Biehel comment. All of you deserve a separate and fully merited response which you shall receive, of that you have my personal assurance.

Again, there is little which can go to prove just how upgefucked today's Liberalism truly is save by noting how much of modern civilization is completely dysfunctional.

Any questions?

Zenster said...

Anon (7/15 4:24 PM): Really excellent point, Zenster.

Thank you so much. In return, would you please consider adopting a specific screen name so that your excellent contributions might be more easy to track?

SBPDL needs your identity. You know it.

Anonymous said...

Please anonymize a copy an post.

Scotsman said...

O/t, but does anyone here know what happened to either OneSTDV or Mangans? Both of their blogs seem to have vanished but I didnt hear anything about either of them quitting.