Tuesday, January 1, 2013

A New Year, a New War

Happy New Year!

As you are no doubt aware, 2013 is the 50th anniversary of the events in Birmingham back in 1963. The current mayor of Birmingham, William Bell, has compared the events that happened in The Magic City to a revolution.
An actual statue in Birmingham's Kelly Ingram Park; snarling dogs won't attack you in 75 percent black Birmingham today, but "random" black people might

And he is right.

It was a revolution that swept over the whole world. 

But what type of revolution was it? [2013 in Birmingham opens year of commemoration of 1963 civil rights events, 1-1-13, Birmingham News]:
That year, the city received worldwide attention for its racial intolerance. And now, in 2013, Birmingham will observe the 50th anniversary of that pivotal year in the civil rights movement and commemorate the struggle that served as a catalyst to change Birmingham, the United States and the globe.

"The trauma of 1963 was a prerequisite for the change that came later because the sources of resistance were so numerous and so entrenched that there had to be a profound disruption in order to bring about significant change," said LaMonte, who also served as the former director of the University of Alabama at Birmingham Center for Urban Affairs, and as a senior staff member in the administration of Richard Arrington, Birmingham's first black mayor.

The impact of the Birmingham movement was global, said Lawrence Pijeaux, president and CEO of the Birmingham Civil Rights Institute. He recalled a 2002 visit by South African leaders Archbishop Desmond Tutu and former President F.W. deKlerk, both Nobel Peace Prize winners.

"On that occasion, Tutu shared in a luncheon speech that, 'The courage of civil rights protesters who helped end segregation in Alabama inspired opponents who overthrew apartheid in South Africa,'" Pijeaux recalled.
 

Birmingham Mayor William Bell has compared the events of 1963 to a revolution. "In 2013, the passing of time allows us to see Birmingham 1963 for what it truly was," he said. "Historical scholars have called the modern Civil Rights Movement 'the Second American Revolution.' And Birmingham 1963 was a key battleground in that revolution."
 The impact of the events in Birmingham were global, that's for sure. South Africa, as The Economist noted, is dying. Though no one will point out the obvious, it was the events in Birmingham in 1963 that helped destroy the apartheid system - that protected the lives of whites in that nation - of South Africa.

With black people in control of the South African government, a process of radical redistribution of wealth and payback for white racial injustice in the past became the norm (Black Economic Empowerment, anyone?).

Much like life in 2013 Birmingham (a city that is 74 percent black and completely dominated by black political power), South Africa is dying [Cry, the beloved country: South Africa is sliding downhill while much of the rest of the continent is clawing its way up, The Economist, 10-20-12]:
NOT so long ago, South Africa was by far the most serious and economically successful country in Africa. At the turn of the millennium it accounted for 40% of the total GDP of the 48 countries south of the Sahara, whereas Nigeria, three times more populous, lurched along in second place with around 14%. The remainder, in raw economic terms, barely seemed to count. Despite South Africa’s loathsome apartheid heritage, solid institutions underpinned its transition to democracy in 1994: a proper Parliament and electoral system, a good new constitution, independent courts, a vibrant press and a first-world stockmarket. Nelson Mandela, whose extraordinary magnanimity helped avert a racial bloodbath, heralded a rainbow nation that would be a beacon for the rest of Africa.
The ruling African National Congress (ANC) is not entirely to blame. South Africa has performed worse than its African neighbours in recent years partly because its mature economy is linked more tightly to the rich world, and thus to the rich world’s problems. And the ANC has notched up some genuine achievements—including housing and some welfare services often denied to the poor black majority under apartheid. But the party’s incompetence and outright corruption are the main causes of South Africa’s sad decline.
Since Mr Mandela retired in 1999, the country has been woefully led. For nine years it endured Thabo Mbeki’s race-tinted prickliness, so different from Mr Mandela’s big-hearted inclusiveness. Mr Mbeki’s denial of the link between HIV and AIDS cost millions of lives. After he was deposed by his party in 2008, there was a brief stand-in, Kgalema Motlanthe, before Jacob Zuma took over the presidency in 2009.
Mr Zuma arrived with a mixed reputation. He had had a string of close shaves with the law for both grand corruption and squalid sexual behaviour; in his favour were his charm, homespun intelligence and canny ability to mediate between people and the many factions that make up the ANC. But stuck between the impatient masses stirred up by racial populists such as Julius Malema on the one hand, and anxious capitalists and greedy party bigwigs on the other, he has drifted and dithered, offering neither vision nor firm government.
Worse, Mr Zuma has failed to tackle the scourge of corruption. The ANC under his aegis has sought to undermine the independence of the courts, the police, the prosecuting authorities and the press. It has conflated the interests of party and state, dishing out contracts for public works as rewards for loyalty—hence the bitter jest that the government is in hock to “tenderpreneurs”. This has reduced economic competitiveness and bolstered a fabulously rich black elite. As a result, too little wealth trickles down.
Nearly two decades after apartheid ended, South Africa is becoming a de facto one-party state. The liberal opposition—the Democratic Alliance (DA), led by a doughty white woman and former anti-apartheid journalist, Helen Zille—has the right ideas, calling above all for the ANC to respect the constitution. The DA has made electoral gains, climbing to 17% of the vote in the last general election in 2009 and 24% in local elections last year. It runs Cape Town and the encompassing Western Cape province better than the ANC runs most of the rest of the country. But most blacks see the DA as too white, and still have a deep-seated loyalty to the ANC—whatever its failings—as the party of Mr Mandela and liberation. That still gives the ANC over 60% of the vote. For the foreseeable future the DA has no earthly chance of national power.
 Is there a connection between the economic and moral climate of South Africa and Birmingham in 2013 and the events that occurred in that hallowed year of 1963?

White people in the United States, Europe, and South Africa exist in a paradigm where the ruling - governing - philosophy dictates that white people are to blame for every misfortune the black people in their midst encounter; black people are never, ever to be blamed for the conditions they create for themselves, when the twin evils of white racism and privilege can be quickly applied.

In "The Most Segregated City in America: city Planning and Civil Rights in Birmingham, 1920-1980" by Charles E. Connerly, we learn what life is like in Birmingham post-1963:
Overall, 91.5 percent of the population in the city's thirteen ghetto poverty tracts was black... For residents who lived in these neighborhoods, poverty in the 1990s was commonplace; unemployment was three times greater than the metropolitan area average; and the majority of families were headed by a single female. Birmingham was no unique in having such concentrated poverty... Nevertheless, Birmingham stood out in 1990 among large cities as having one of the ten most impoverished populations in the nation. While the basic housing and infrastructure problems in the city's black neighborhoods had been largely addressed, poverty had increasingly become the most apparent problem in these areas. (p. 274-275)
Birmingham elected its first black mayor, Richard Arrington, in 1979. Black people were no longer discriminated against by the city government - indeed, it was white people who would be discriminated against through Mayor Arrington's affirmative action programs [Affirmative Action: One City's Experience; Fighting Bias With Bias and Leaving a Rift, New York Times, 8-21-1995] - which Connerly pointed out on p. 283:
When Bull Connor treated all blacks with contempt, it was easier for blacks from different backgrounds to come together. But a black mayor and, after 1985, a majority black city council  meant that city government's actions that hurt black neighborhoods could no longer be construed as racist and therefore were more difficult for a broad group of black citizens to unite against.
The black citizens of Birmingham, with the absence of white people and their white racism, are incapable of creating new businesses to replace those that left with white flight -- well, save title loan and payday shops.

Just like in South Africa, the new black government in Birmingham is incapable of keeping prosperity alive or maintaining any level of economic activity near what the former white government and the white citizens (now living peacefully in the suburbs) could create.

Instead, black residents of Birmingham gathered to ring in the New Year in Kelly Ingram Park, not with champagne and party favors, but with candles[Vigil honors those lost to violence in Birmingham area in 2012, offers prayers for peaceful 2013, Birmingham News, 12-31-12]:
Nearly six minutes passed from the time three community activists read aloud the name of Jefferson County's first homicide victim of 2012 until they reached the end of the list of all those who died in violence here this year.
Gathered around them tonight in Birmingham's Kelly Ingram Park were a few dozen family members of victims, holding candles and many of them holding photos of their lost loved ones.
One of the organizers of tonight's vigil, Carolyn Johnson of the Parents Against Violence Foundation, noted that most of Birmingham's homicide victims are young black males, just like her own son, Rodreckus DeAndrew Johnson, who was shot and killed in 2003.
"It's an embarrassment. It's a sick epidemic in our community," Johnson said. "It's going to take all of us standing together, banding together to take back our community."
Yolanda Ross was there in honor of her nephew, Duntrell Goins, 17, who was shot eight times as he walked to the Fairfield Preparatory High School graduation in May. Ross said her son would have been a senior there this upcoming school year.
The Birmingham News doesn't see fit to print that those individuals participating in the homicides in Birmingham are black males too.

2013 must be the year to strike back -- the condition of Birmingham in 2013, much like that found in South Africa, is directly correlated to the displacement of white people and the electing of a new people to the halls of government power.

Black people.

A revolution was won in Birmingham in 1963. We all live under the ramifications of this victory in 2013. 

SBPDL readers -- Happy New Year.

This is OUR year.

49 comments:

FYT said...

"This is OUR year"

It had better be. There aren't many years left.

Anonymous said...

South Africa underlines the tragedy of colonialism, whether you want to admit it or not. Left to their own devices, Africans would have no expectations of prosperity or progress. They wouldn't know what they were missing. When their countries were colonized, they realized what was possible, but their fundamental lack of ability to achieve progress just left them wanting. Materialism frustrated. White people gave them everything when they owned South Africa, and demanded only civilized behavior in return. Now white people are being driven out, and black people are still used to being given everything. We never belonged on that continent any more than Africans belonged in America. It was a mistake to have ever mixed in any way, and unfortunately, white people caused most of it to happen up until around 1960.

I find it hard not to be angry at my ancestors for bringing so many Africans over here. I'd wager I'm as angry at it as the descendents of those Africans are. But we're angry about it for completely opposite reasons, amusingly enough.

Anonymous said...

http://www.jsonline.com/news/crime/restitution-for-child-care-subsidy-fraud-slips-through-cracks-t080f5a-184580781.html

Read this, regardless of where you live.

The article documents extreme fraud under the "Wisconsin Shares" child care program. This is where the State of Wisconsin pays private "child care providers" for the care of kids on babies. The care providers sign up welfare kids in their neighborhood who never actually attend, bill the state for millions, and kick some of the money back to the employees and families in on the scheme. Unsurprisingly, the vast majority of this fraud is being committed by Blacks.

These individuals are being convicted of $300,000 in fraud, they're buying Maseratis and Land Rovers, they're purchasing multiple properties, and NO ONE is doing real time and NO ONE in the state government is being fired or being held accountable for this.

Don't think it is just Wisconsin either. The same is happening across the country. Wisconsin is probably nothing compared to the fraud in California, New York, Illinois and Florida.

Think about this as you head back to work this week. Think about this when your kids ask you for a toy or gift that you can't afford. Think about this when you sit down to crunch your monthly budget and pay your bills.

This is your money and you're underwriting their lavish lifestyles. Your taxes have gone up. You can feel the inflation and price rises hitting us. You see what is going on in Europe financially. And yet they're driving around in a Maserati, they're buying new homes with YOUR money on 0 down, they don't give a crap about this country or about you (as they, they "don't give a f***"), and living it up better than ever. And the government goons who aid and abet this illegality while raking in their own $125,000 salaries? Untouchable. Union-protected. Federally-protected. Never scrutinized by the media.

If you care at all about your children's futures, WAKE UP. Wake up your neighbors and family. If they can't deal with reality, if they can't turn away from the TV or the football game, walk away from them and go your own way. STAND UP.

MuayTyson said...

The wife and I were watching The First 48 on the computer over the holiday. She remarked to me that blacks seem to be different emotionally. They never seem overly upset when a close loved one dies unless there is an obvious camera or people around. They do get very upset when it is clear that they have commited a crime and will be held accountable for it.

I think it is possible that not only is IQ different but they are emotionally different the ability to feel empathy and sympathy are different. Think about it. How do you govern or even work as a clerk in government if you can not identify with people?

Blacks only have strong reactions when it involves them personally. They also have very little ability to control their own emotions. Stoicism is not a trait associated with blacks.

Being a black mayor or politician must be very difficult when essentially you would have to overcome Sociopathic tendencies. There is just not much left over when you add in all the vices that will attract the average black. Sex, material goods, trips, and dispossible cash are all to available to someone high in government. How can there be much left over to govern with when it is all spent?

Is there a black politician who has not had an issue with affiars, illegitimate children, or graft?

I think we get to caught up in IQ and it becomes an easy out when there are far more differences.

Anonymous said...

I appreciate your work, sir. Donation coming soon.

Anonymous said...

Our year to do what? Spread the word? Most folks don't care, never will. Thinking hurts their heads.

The Zimmerman trial should be interesting, though.

Anonymous said...

The middle class in America, South Africa, and across all countries and/or continents is being strangled by the elite and their corporations. Blacks or people of African descent or other third world turd varieties are just pawns being used by the elite to keep the middle or "merchant class" in check. America was the great hope for those of the merchant or middle classes to leave their previous homelands, come and experience prosperity by establishing their own small businesses, etc....and it worked...for awhile...until our leaders (ex: Reagan) sold out the middle class to corporations and the elite. Our leaders opened up our borders so that cheap or next to nothing labor could come in and undermine the established merchant class.

South African middle class folks are going through the same.

None of my ancestors owned slaves. I did not get here till the 80's, what reparations do I owe? Furthermore, the slaves brought here in the 1600's, 1700's, 1800's, etc...well their progeny are quite entitled aren't they? Are they not privileged?

The fact is most Americans in the middle and working classes do not owe anyone, American black or African American or turd American wahtever..anything. The ELITE brought the slaves over because the ELITE did not want to work...and now we are holding the bag.

Which is why I am boycotting paying back my student loans and which is why I did a strategic foreclosure on my home. Why the hell should I have to pay for others' mistakes and/or market manipulations?

Racism is just a mask for the bigger lies and manipulations put upon the middle or merchant class. Socioeconomic status is the BIG issue here and if your are middle class, you really should be referred to as the "middle crushed" because that it was they, the elite, are trying to do to us...crush us....

White Mom in the Turds

Anonymous said...

Only DWL's, blacks and other morons would look at the history of destruction that ensued and find cause to celebrate that destruction. That, in itself, is a good indicator that they're cataclysmically stupid and incapable of facing reality. Their tiny brains can't connect the dots and see the real picture and even when shown the monster, they delusionally declare it to be a cute, cuddly puppy.
I can't imagine going through life being that stupid and clueless. The world to them must be nothing more than random shapes, colors and noises.

Anonymous said...

OT, but I had to share in light of recent discussions: http://www.city-data.com/forum/sioux-falls/1632652-sioux-falls-welcoming-diversity.html

Note the hijacking of the discussion by groids and DWLs via the approved talking points. This is a widely read forum where SBPDL readers might be wise to enter the debate, armed with PK'S avalanche of facts.

Regarding SA, the sheeple that think this story could never play out in the USSA will only understand the dissolution of their fallacy when the Obama Civilian Defense Forces are kicking in their front door to seize weapons.

Gwinnett Gladiator

Anonymous said...

SMH at all this angst collecting this money these Blacks have stolen when the easiest solution is not even discussed, end the program.

Californian said...

Re "reparations" for slavery, I will repeat what I have said before:

Whites owe blacks no reparations, no debt, no black studies programs, no national holidays, not a single thing. Any more than you would owe a dime to a three card monte street hustler.

From a legal standpoint:
* Slavery and segregation (whatever their morality) were fully within the laws of their times, upheld by courts and supported by apparent democratic majorities. Any "punishment" for them would be an ex post facto law, in violation of the Constitution.
* Even if slavery-segregation (or apartheid) were "crimes," US legal practice does not allow for collective punishments. In fact, collective punishments can be considered a war crime under the Geneva conventions.
* If whites owed blacks "reparations" for slavery, then West African blacks would owe American blacks for enslaving their ancestors; Muslims would owe Christians, Hindus and lots more for their slave raiding; American Indian tribes would owe the descendents of people their ancestors enslaved; DWLs would owe taxpayers all the public funds dumped into BRA; and so forth and so on.

From an historical standpoint, the only way blacks could be truly compensated for slavery would be by being moved to the African countries of their ancestors. There are various conventions on the right of return of refugees to their homelands. (One wonders what the current citizens of West Africa would think of such a return to the motherland scheme?!)

And of course, if whites collectively owe blacks for slavery-segregation-apartheid, then by the same "logic" blacks would collectively owe whites for the destruction of cities like Detroit, the rioting in the Long Hot Summers, the costs of maintaining the prison-industrial complex and welfare state, the wrecking of countries such as Congo and Zimbabwe, and etc., etc.

To sum up: "reparations" for slavery-segregation is a hustle. Like any other hustle, it will end the day that Americans stand up and tell the hustlers to get lost.

Anonymous said...

We have to stop with these welfare programs.They do not work and we aka white people let this happen over and over again with the same result>

Bogolyubski said...

Re: Anon of 9:48 PM (WI Welfare fraud)

Keep in mind that the WI legislature is controlled by the R-jerseys, along with the governor's office. Yet again, we have additional proof (as if any more is needed): Republicans are the enemy.

The most astonishing thing about all this is that there is no actual opposition to all this, either in the USSA or even in SA. Whites continue to overwhelmingly buy into the system, to believe the lies they are told. There are several HBD folks here who like to point out the IQ deviation between whites and blacks. This is an example of theory vs. reality on the ground. Blacks, totally given over to evil as they are, nevertheless have a political seat at the table. Middle class whites have none. Even so, the majority of them - especially unmarried females - continue to support BRA. At the end of the day, the extra 15 IQ points do them no good, addled as they are with leftist utopian ideology. The whites in WI and other states refuse to oppose the massive looting scheme under way - and so it continues unchecked.

Anonymous said...

In this and so many more articles over the last year, you have shown time and again that:

1) Blacks are less intelligent, moral, law-abiding, rational than whites.

2) Crime is disproportionately laid at the feet of blacks, rather than whites, and that even when done so, Blacks cannot- or will not- stop their crime sprees.

3) Whites are no longer "guilty" of whatever it is we are supposed to be guilty of, when it comes to blacks- simply because blacks, when whites are either a) removed from the equation or b) the so-called 'impediments to black success' can no longer be blamed as 'Whitey's fault', continue to remain..... Black!

So, can we get rid of them, once and for all, and stop the racket of extortion that blacks mean to Real Americans?

(THe same thing applies to other minorities, also, of course- it's just that blacks have been here the longest, have the largest amount of data documenting their inferiority, and inability to be 'equal'.)

Can we drop the lies of Lincoln, the WBTS, and restore White Hegemony, starting with impeaching Obama? OR seceding from his nascent version of Obamugabeland?

- Fr. John+

Bogolyubski said...

Take a look at this. Ongoing open genocide against white farmers in SA. Yet, what did we just read about in the article posted by PK? A snippet from The Economist which mentions the ongoing cooperation of the majority of whites remaining there in SA with a regime who is more or less openly planning and carrying out a genocide.

White SA's have full and complete moral justification to use any and all means at their disposal - up to and including use of WMDs - to destroy, undermine and topple the regime there along with any person or organization - domestic or foreign - who supports it. Are they working to do this even in an underground way? Hell no. Most are actively supporting it themselves. Superior IQ, huh? They can't even see that they're targeted for elimination - and continue to support those who are planning to do it.

Anonymous said...

I have an idea. Let's make all welfare (that is paid to various groups) be funded by those among the respective groups that are not on welfare. Ditto for ebt cards, rent on Section 8 housing and all the other "perks." All employees would be identified on tax forms by race and be taxed according to the costs their community incurred.
Shaniqua's welfare check each month would be about 2 cents if she got one at all. No black person would put up with her fat & worthless ass living large on their dime.
If the black community had to pay for their own, their own would be up the proverbial creek without a paddle and the howling would be heard all the way back in Africa.
It's only ok when someone else is footing the bill.
At the same time, let all those of Hispanic origin foot the bill for all the illegal Hispanics too~ schooling, health care etc.
In both cases, they'd change their tune about welfare and illegal aliens so fast it would make your head spin.

YIH said...

Moar TNB in written form: If We Let Shawty Lo’s Show Get on the Air, We Will Have Failed Ourselves by Nig - err, Nick Chiles. It's about an ''aspiring (c)rapper'' (ain't they all?) with 11 niglets by 10 sows. And of course Destructive Feedblack, I mean this alleged writer is whining about this new ''reality show'' on Oxygen (AKA Fail TV) because it [accurately] shows the breeding patterns of hoodrats.
Now I don't even know why it's whining, Fail TV likely gets ratings somewhere between The Golf Channel and PBS so it's not like anyone will be watching it anyway.
The sad part about this is after the Fail TV cameras go away all that will be left is more in zoos, I mean ''pubic skools'' to go on to either breed more hoodrats, shoot at each other or become inmates in the state NU.
What I would watch is a ''reality show'' where they send this (c)rapper, sows and niglets ''back to da mudderland'' and show how they are successfully reintroduced to their natural habitat.
It'd be perfect for the National Geographic channel.

bubo said...

http://jacksonville.com/news/crime/2013-01-01/story/law-disorder-police-release-sketch-man-suspected-beating-couple#comment-682509

Black "teen/youth/honorstoodent/" wearing hoodie assaults elderly white couple out for an afternoon stroll with a baseball bat. Word from police that I know is that it wasn't a robbery but just "random."

Remember though, white people being leery of blacks is baseless racism according to Michael Moore and libmedia inc.

Anonymous said...

Whirlwinder says:

I was a political science major at Memphis State University in 1965 and in one class the prof brought up the competition between Birmingham and Atlanta for which city would be the biggest and best in the South. It was thought that Birmingham with its Steel industry would prevail and we moved on to the next topic. I was clueless as to the problems brought about by black 'leadership' in Bham then but now all has become clear.

pat said...

The case of South Africa isn't over yet. There are a couple more acts to this play.

The first act was the primorial situation. The Bantus had come in from the north putting pressure on the Capoids. There was no high culture but the Zulu had begun to have an effective military. Had the white man not come South Africa would have remained more or less at this same neolithic level.

The second act was the colonial period. South Africa prospered partly because it had a climate more conducive to Western culture than that found in the tropics further north. SA beagn to modernize and insustrialize.

The third act was the expulsion of the Europeans by the Africans. Much of the infrastructure of European style prosperity crumbled and the nation began to revert to its pre-colonial state.

The fourth act is the neo-colonial period. SA is too valuable as real estate to long survive when undefended. The Chinese are moving in. There are many media articles about the growing Chinese presense all over southern and eastern Africa.

The next colonial wave can not be like the first one. The Boers and the English encountered resistance but found it easy to overcome. Except for Isandlwana, almost every open battle was a massacre of the blacks. Defeating blacks was not much of a problem but ruling them was. The native resistance ultimately drove out the Europeans.

Africa proved more difficult than the Americas to colonize. In the Americas biology was on the side of the inavaders as disease wiped out most of the native populations. The most prosperous areas were those where there were the fewest Amerindians left.

I expect that this lesson will not be lost on the Chinese. They could invade and subdue the whole subcontinent of Africa south of the equador with not much trouble. But if they did so they would inherit a population that has been immunized against rulers of another race. There would just be another Mandela and ANC all over again. There's no profit in that.

The record has been that the best way to establish a stable and secure colony is to build where all or almost all of the previous indigenous population has been removed by disease. The Chinese will want to eliminate most of the blacks if they want to establish themselves permanently in Africa. After all they do not really need to keep the blacks for their labor. There are millions of Chinese laborers available. Mass migrations of Chinese workers to China aids both China and Africa.

Robert Harris the famous novelist, in a non-fiction book predicted that whites would develop a virus that only killed black people. I don't know if such a thing is possible, but if it is, I would expect it to be first deployed not by whites but by the Chinese. Such a virus would do for them what the smallpox virus did for the Spanish and English colonists in the Americas.

Waatch the news. If you hear about a new deadly plague in Africa it may have started.

Albertosaurus

Jay Santos said...

Bogolyubski said...

Re: Anon of 9:48 PM (WI Welfare fraud)

The most astonishing thing about all this is that there is no actual opposition to all this... the extra 15 IQ points do them no good, addled as they are with leftist utopian ideology.


I'd suggest that leftist utopian ideology itself serves a purpose similar to the earphones Vonnegut's "intelligent" characters were forced to wear in Harrison Bergeron. That work doesn't get nearly the attention it deserves. It's fantastically prescient.

pat said...

Mom in the Turds wrote:
The ELITE brought the slaves over because the ELITE did not want to work...and now we are holding the bag.

Sort of. But not exactly.

In the English speaking colonies slavery was introduced by my direct ancestor Abraham Piersay in Jamestown.

Abe was indeed a member of the elite. He was for example the owner of the first windmill in the Americas. He was the biggest landholder too. As to whether he was lazy, maybe he was just sensible. Working in the Virginia fields had proven to be fatal to Europeans. Peirsay had planned to buy land and work the fields with poor whites he had recruited in London as indentured servants. The deal was that the workers would be indentured for seven years in return for passage. But the majority died within six months.

The Jamestown government was facing the anilation of the colony. They had tried to enslave the local Indians but that effort had been a failure. In any case they would be lucky to just survive against the intermitently hostile Indians much less conquer and enslave them. They turned for slaves just as the Spanish had in the sugar islands of the Caribean from the native Indians to imported Africans.

They entreated Piersay to bring in some the black slaves who were known to do well working in the sub-tropical climates of the Americas.

He did so. He acquired a ship and went to Africa. So Abe saved the future United States of America and black people made their contribution.

I don't know the day when Piersay was born so I don't know exactly what day we should celebrate this early American hero's life. But I'd suggest we appropriate Martin Luther King's Birthday now that we know how King's contibutions have worked out. Piersay saved the nation. King damn near finished it.

Albertosaurus

Anonymous said...

...and to think that Johannesburg used to be a world-class city...
It's just SO depressing...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LW6lOdxqSUE

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pMRG-0iCk4M

Anonymous said...

Off-topic, and a bit dated, but new to me. Maybe it was mentioned on this site or similar:

Feds closing in on former Mayor Ray Nagin, court documents make plain.

Anonymous said...

"The trauma of 1963 was a prerequisite for the change that came later because the sources of resistance were so numerous and so entrenched that there had to be a profound disruption in order to bring about significant change,"

This is something that needs to be challenged. The Civil Rights Movement had the support of:
* The federal government.
* The armed forces (first to integrate in the late 1940s).
* The national media, especially television.
* National organizations such as the ACLU and NAACP.
* A considerable chunk of the corporate power structure.
* Not to mention just about every last leftist, communist, and pacifist in the country.

In contrast, the support for segregation was largely localized: some Southern politicians, university students and newspapers/radio stations, as well as the Citizens' Councils. Since Washington DC could federalize the Southern state National Guards, one of the main props to Southern resistance was knocked out in the 1950s. As the communists would put it, the "correlation of forces" was definitely on the side of the Civil Rights movement.

So CAL Snowman said...

This is OUR year. I like the optimism, it reminds me of The Goonies. "Down here it's our time. It's our time down here."

But seriously, do you honestly believe this is going to be OUR year? Did you write that sentence after beer bonging a bottle of Korbel? I don't like being a debbie downer, but there is absolutely NOTHING on the horizon to suggest that 2013 is going to be anything other than another horrific nightmare for White people on planet Earth. I mean the Globalist Bankers would really have to screw up big time to lose the game to us at this point. A lot of people are probably wondering WHY? Why are the Globalist Bankers trying to ruin Western Civilization and the White race just so they can rule the world? It's a logical question; Who would want to rule over an Earth that is one big third world shit hole with no first world White nations? The answer to that question is quite simple. A Globalist Elite One World Government AND First World White Majority Nations are MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE. You cannot have both. You can either have thriving first world White nations, OR you can have a New World Order where EVERY nation on Earth is essentially a multicultural third world hell. Highly developed, homogeneous, and technologically advanced White nations would prove to be insurmountable obstacles to the Globalist Bankers. Advanced, homogeneous White nations would be filled with EDUCATED, INFORMED individuals that were not subject to media manipulation. Or to put it another way, advanced White, homogeneous first world nations would NOT ALLOW the Globalist Elite Bankers to usher in a New World Order. That is why our nations are being sacrificed on the altar of multiculturalism. When they say "White Supremacy" what they are really referring to is our ability to stop the Globalist New World Order from taking place.

OT - I saw "The Hobbit" the other night. What an incredible movie, I liked it more than any of the "Lord Of The Rings" movies. Now normally I do not support the Communist Hollywood machine, but "The Hobbit" was competing with Djnago Unchained for top spot at the box office and "The Hobbit" features an EXCLUSIVELY ALL WHITE CAST! There are no blacks because there are no Uruk Hai in "The Hobbit" and the goblins and orcs are all CGI. I am wondering if the so/so reviews are more propaganda than anything, seeing as how the movie is so dreadfully lily White. I cannot understand how "The Return of the King" (the weakest of the 3 movies) won an oscar for best picture, and "The Hobbit" gets middling reviews. Also one more thing to the people that post here, please stop writing : WAKE UP! It is absolutely infuriating. We are all wide awake here at SBPDL thank you very much.

Whiskey said...

Can anyone tell me why the soldier holding the dog in the statue looks Korean? Did the same Chinese artist that depicted MLK as some Mongolian overlord version of Ozymandias "Look upon my works ye mighty and despair" do this statue?

Mr. Rational said...

Pat, your ancestor Abraham Piersay (~1587-1628) may have brought Africans to Virginia, but they weren't chattel slaves until the case of John Casor was decided in 1655.  Piersay had been dead for a quarter century by then.

MuayTyson said...

So Cal,
I can't lie and say I am not pessimistic but there is some silver on those dark clouds.

#1. No one Left or Right trusts the media in the US or Europe.

#2. France, England, and Germany have started a small push back to the multicult mostly against muslims but it helps the cause.

#3. Whites and everyone else have PC fatigue. Whites in particular are sick of being blamed for all social ills read any story revolving around crime or race. If the comment section is not disabled you will see a lot of race realism.

#4. Small groups are forming and will continue to grow. I like Youth for Western Civilization.

#5. The GOP has fucked up pretty big first the stolen election with out a peep and now Boehner and the fiscal cliff business. Whites are starting to see the Tea Party is the only party with their concerns at heart.

I will admit I was wrong. People said it needs to get worse before it gets better Obama being elected was for the best. I was from the other camp and wanted to slow all that none sense. Now I see it was actually great and now I say bring on the financial collapse, bring on the black mob violence.

The media can only hide things for so long thanks to the internet and alternative media the truth or at least a closer version will get out there.

I just hope a charismatic and well thought out person can stand as a figure head for traditional(White) America. Jared Taylor is awesome but he is almost to well spoken and thoughtful seems almost elitist and that turns some people off plus he is not any younger. I think we will get a JFK type figure who can consolidate us better. Of course it has to be before things get to bad or the demographic shift gets to far gone. Maybe P.K. will surprise us and be that figure? Maybe he is a better behind the scenes guy?

MuayTyson said...

So Cal,
I can't lie and say I am not pessimistic but there is some silver on those dark clouds.

#1. No one Left or Right trusts the media in the US or Europe.

#2. France, England, and Germany have started a small push back to the multicult mostly against muslims but it helps the cause.

#3. Whites and everyone else have PC fatigue. Whites in particular are sick of being blamed for all social ills read any story revolving around crime or race. If the comment section is not disabled you will see a lot of race realism.

#4. Small groups are forming and will continue to grow. I like Youth for Western Civilization.

#5. The GOP has fucked up pretty big first the stolen election with out a peep and now Boehner and the fiscal cliff business. Whites are starting to see the Tea Party is the only party with their concerns at heart.

I will admit I was wrong. People said it needs to get worse before it gets better Obama being elected was for the best. I was from the other camp and wanted to slow all that none sense. Now I see it was actually great and now I say bring on the financial collapse, bring on the black mob violence.

The media can only hide things for so long thanks to the internet and alternative media the truth or at least a closer version will get out there.

I just hope a charismatic and well thought out person can stand as a figure head for traditional(White) America. Jared Taylor is awesome but he is almost to well spoken and thoughtful seems almost elitist and that turns some people off plus he is not any younger. I think we will get a JFK type figure who can consolidate us better. Of course it has to be before things get to bad or the demographic shift gets to far gone. Maybe P.K. will surprise us and be that figure? Maybe he is a better behind the scenes guy?

Anonymous said...

SOMEONE answer me this. I have read posts on here about the South's reasons for Jim Crow being the Blacks overall bad behavior. Is this true? Is there any documentation confirming this theory? You see, many point to Jim Crow to demonstrate the racist tendencies of the White men in the south during those times. They say the Blacks were good law abiding Christian citizens who were discriminated against for no reason by the White man. Someone, anyone have any information on the behavior of Blacks during the times following the Civil War to the 1960s..

Anonymous said...

The most stupid line in the Economist article is "Despite South Africa’s loathsome apartheid heritage, solid institutions underpinned its transition to democracy in 1994: a proper Parliament and electoral system, a good new constitution, independent courts, a vibrant press and a first-world stockmarket."

What the author fails to grasp is that BECAUSE of South Africa's apartheid heritage, solid institutions underpinned its transition to democracy in 1994: a proper Parliament and electoral system, a good new constitution, independent courts, a vibrant press and a first-world stockmarket.

Anonymous said...

We look at Birmingham and shake our heads, but look at South Carolina with an Indian governor and an appointed Negro senator. Will no one in the South wake up? Do you think your grandfathers would have rolled over for this? Is there no one in Dixie with a spine?

Lily White said...

It's remarkable how the further away from past "sins" we get as a country, the more whiny the "gibsmedat" crowd gets. They know nothing about history, but they sure know that there were black slaves in America! They can't tell you when it was, exactly, or when slavery ended, but they are certainly aware of its existence.

It seems to go something like this: the typical De'ron or Keifon insists that he cannot be successful in America, because of the "legacy of slavery." Now, he can't say for sure whether or not he even HAD an ancestor that was a slave in America, or for that matter, what that ancestor's name was, whether it was a man or a woman, or in what part of the country the ancestor lived. He couldn't say if the slave ancestor in question worked in the fields, or in the house, was a cook or a gardener. He wouldn't be able to identify the ancestor in a photograph, having no idea what he or she looked like.

All he knows is that due to the possible existence of this complete stranger well over a hundred years ago, he is so traumatized that he can't stay in school, get a job, and obey the law.

Jay Santos said...

That statue of the negro and the cop with a snarling dog is just unbelievable, which means I can't believe it was conceived of, executed, paid for and a prominent place was found for it.

The negroes behind it I can understand. But I'd like to know the names of the white people who were behind this project. Those people should be stripped of every asset they and their progeny will ever acquire and that money used to build statues in every city of this country, displaying a gang of negroes raping and beating a non-black couple. Instead of that bill board PK was talking about, that's the advertisement that's needed.

The mental illness that underlies this cult of negro worship, needs not an entry in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), but an entire volume dedicated to it.

Anonymous said...

To Cal Snowman

Long ago I came to this same conclusion about the New world order and the elimination of whites. It is the only logical answer and conclusion one can draw from this insanity. After all we know they are not this stupid, it is definately planned by the elites. You can't have one world government without destroying the white middle class in all the western countries. It is the only entity large enough and strong enough to stop them... and we are losing, Thanks to the idiot liberals. All is not lost yet, We will have our chance to turn the tide. Just hang in there everyone, overconfidence is high among our the liberal fools. Remember they are not smart enough or tough enough to pull this off in the end.

Moondoggie

Mr. Rational said...

Anonymous (GET A HANDLE ALREADY!) asks:  I have read posts on here about the South's reasons for Jim Crow being the Blacks overall bad behavior. Is this true? Is there any documentation confirming this theory?

I thought I had a lot more pertinent references, but the best thing that popped up in my bookmarks was "The Negro, the Southerner's Problem" (1904):
http://books.google.com/books/about/The_Negro.html?id=ayA9-U-_QgkC
Also, The Prostrate State
http://books.google.com/books?id=ruIaAAAAYAAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=the+prostrate+state&hl=en&sa=X&ei=kfDkULjLLo202AWOyIH4Dw&ved=0CEAQ6AEwAA

I know I've seen numerous century-old news reports about Blacks rioting, having gunfights on trains and whatnot, but I seem to have forgotten to bookmark them.

Anonymous said...

It's remarkable how the further away from past "sins" we get as a country, the more whiny the "gibsmedat" crowd gets.

It's due to the failure of BRA (Black Run America). Despite every civil rights and social engineering program which blacks demanded being put into effect, their situation continues to deteriorate. So their "leaders" amp up the agitprop. Otherwise, they'd have to face the reality of their own failure, and that of their DWL allies.

It is interesting how too many people think that slavery ended just a few decades back, while segregation, apparently, continued until the election of Obama. You wonder how many people live in a mass delusion.

Anonymous said...

SOMEONE answer me this. I have read posts on here about the South's reasons for Jim Crow being the Blacks overall bad behavior. Is this true? Is there any documentation confirming this theory?

this is a good blog, it has a lot of older news articles and first-hand accounts from years past.

http://thosewhocansee.blogspot.fr/

AnalogMan said...

Mr Rational:

I appreciate your taking the trouble to link to the comments that you reference. Just one request, and a friendly tip. When you code the full URL in the link, the browser reloads the page. If you leave out the URL and simply code [a href="#id"] it branches directly to the id in the currently loaded page. Much faster. Try it on the link above.

comedia divina said...

Jacob zuma, president of south africa is on record saying that having dogs as pets is white culture, black people don't look after dogs cause they are more family oriented-what a laugh.

I suppose black people have their family utmost in mind when they ghettoficate a nice dog owning white suburb.

Google Zuma's dog comments.

Nice to see all the white liberal pussies, back tracking for zuma's faux pas.

They all trying to say how black people love pet dogs, relating the only example they know, that of obama and his portuguese water dog.

Zuma hasn't said a truer word, its nice whn a black person says what we all know to be true.

Black people don't like pet dogs, the only time black people have dogs and they not obama or oprah, is to do dog fighting.

All the white liberal pussies with their knickers in a knot, saying how good pet dog owners black people like.

Comedy especially for me-loving it

Anonymous said...

comedia divina:

What a joke. Blacks perpetrate a tremendous amount of animal torture and abuse, dogs and cats in particular. I wonder how the liberals can blind themselves to that? Of course, the MSM never reports on those things, you only see it in the local news. But blacks have about as much compassion for animals as they do for each other and YT or other humans.

Mr. Rational said...

AnalogMan:  I used to do that, and found that all of my comments were being dumped in PK's spam folder.

If you look closely, I believe you will find that you have bookmarked a URL including a string "?showComment=..."  That string differs for every comment link on the page, and will force a reload if you click on any other comment link or on the main post URL.  If you strip that portion and hit return before bookmarking, the problem goes away.

pat said...

I want to thank Mr. Rational for giving me the reference to the Casor case.

As it happens I watched the slave ship rebellion movie Amistad for the first time this week. The Casor case is similar in that it involves the many legal complexities of slavery.

Apparently there was a black indentured servant named Johnson who served his seven years and became free. He got his land grant and prospered. He then brought in five more blacks to work for him. But when one of these, Casor, completed his term of service, Johnson refused to release him. It went to court and they denied Casor the "Rights of an Englishman". They officially declared him a slave because he was an alien - an African.

This is an intriguing history because at least for the legal status of slaves - a black man introduced slavery into the English speaking colonies of the Americas.

There are many details that I can't find in Wikipedia. At the time this occurred there were 300 blacks working in or around Jamestown. These would have been those who were brought in earlier by Piersay and others. I don't believe they were treated as indentured servants but rather as slaves. That is to say they were not freed and given a small land grant after seven years. They were kept toiling for life.

That raises the question of where Johnson had come from. He was probably a free negro from London. He had been extended the Rights of an Englishman. Casor and the other four blacks who worked for him were probably imported directly from Africa. I'm just guessing. I'll have to do some research.

So the Casor case established de jure slavery in Jamestown where de facto slavery already existed.

Albertosaurus

Anonymous said...

Jay Santo's: Another much needed work would be "Negrophrenia: The Delusional Beliefs and Mythologies of the American Negro." It would be an instant #1 bestseller as each and every mistaken belief and mythology held by Negro's in America was debunked by facts and figures. Of course, pyschologists could weigh in on the subject and give an in depth analysis of the delusional syndrome.
It would be a perfect companion book to the one you suggest.
A lot of the Negro worship witnessed today comes from ignorant fools who have fallen for all the delusions, mythologies and "beliefs" of blacks as they've been brainwashed into believing all the crap has any truth to it.
Think of all the people who believe all the Negro Invention Myths and myths about slavery etc and it becomes apparent.
Debunk it all and the Negro worshippers come to look like colossal fools.
Negro worship would be severely impacted once the fools were deprogrammed. However,the hardcore deluded would remain in complete denial. Psychologists could cover that subject in the final chapter thus leaving the fools no refuge in their own BS.

Californian said...

You can't have one world government without destroying the white middle class in all the western countries.

This is essentially correct. A strong middle class has always been a counterbalance to elites. Today, elites use liberal ideology to justify the New World Order of globalization, supra-national organizations, open borders, and etc.

Importation of large numbers of third worlders undermines national states. Being an Englishman or German no longer means what it once meant. It also provides cheap labor to undercut standards of living. Then police state measures are enacted to prevent inter-ethnic conflict. All the while, the babble machines extoll the glories of multicultism.

South Africa is a microcosm of this. Knock out a white nationalist government, replace it with a mob of third world stooges, extract the resources, remove white farmers and professionals via "black economic empowerment "and terrorism. Then as the country self-destructs into poverty and lawlessness, congratulate yourself for "fighting racism."

Pretty much what is now playing out in Europa and North America.

Meantime, your average citizen watches 500 channels of agitprop and marches to the polls every two or four years.

FYT said...

"We look at Birmingham and shake our heads, but look at South Carolina with an Indian governor and an appointed Negro senator"

Neither of those indviduals in an agent of BRA. That is a good thing. We have to open to embracing ideological allies wherever we find them.

BhamBoy said...

And while racist anti-white mayor bell spends hundreds of thousands of dollars on this year-long "celebration" - the city is asking the TAXPAYING public to donate money, goods, clothing, food, cots and their time to staff the warming-stations opened at Boutwell Auditorium, where the homeless and others can seek shelter when the temps dip to dangerous levels. So I don't get that -- city has tons of cash for celebrations but NOTHING to help the homeless and others needing warm places to sleep? Most of whom are BLACK? You don't think mayor bell cares less about his own "people" than he does partying and being seen in front of the camera, now do ya?

- Bham Resident

Anonymous said...

If black people love dogs so much, and Barry Soetoro's portugese water dog is such an example - then why did someone have to GIVE him the dog? Why didn't he and his clan go out and buy their own dog????! BECAUSE THEY DIDN'T WANT IT. Probably afraid moochelle's voo-doo practicing mother would try and cook it up for dinner. OR BARRY HIMSELF! He has confessed to eating dogs - so apparently there IS a secondary use for dogs by black people other than dog fighting -- THEY MAKE GOOD EATIN!